Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

DFens_666

Players
  • Content Сount

    13,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    11029
  • Clan

    [CHEFT]

Everything posted by DFens_666

  1. DFens_666

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Dont want to disagree, but i would like to add, that its "easier" (meaning, you need less damage) to be top XP earner while being lowtier. Not easier in a sense of getting that damage ofc. But being hightier you have to work more to be first in XP gain. Here from a couple of days ago I dont consider 66k to be a good game with Fiji. On the other hand, i was constantly shielding the DDs away, but that wont yield me any XP But since i got tons of damage on an Ibuki and Fletcher, which are 2 tiers above me, i think i got a lot of XP for that.
  2. DFens_666

    NO MORE TWO CV GAMES

    @WolfGewehr devstriked the Richelieu, from that pov it was easier for him since the enemies rushed blindly into us (not that our CVs really tried to stop them - as you can see, they are on the last places which i think is extremely questionable) I wouldnt say it was a fun game, but atleast he got some damage in
  3. Alaska makes other Cruiser go "Ouch"
  4. DFens_666

    NO MORE TWO CV GAMES

    How is this fun? I had 23k damage btw... Somehow, the enemy team just died ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Couldnt get closer, because the 2 CVs focused us T8s anyway. Then i had all the other ships at 20-24km, so they can shoot me, i cant reach them Worst part was, we spawned at B alone, so CVs started harassing us from the get go. Turned to A, but our guys from A went to B. Turned around again, and then i Ended up behind C, since the Conqueror/DM/Richelieu/Shima pushed through A into our spawn. Shima wanted to go for our CV, but when i got surface spotted our DD intercepted it. Our team never left the spawn, we sat on a quarter of the map basicly But Yolo in 4 CV games is bad. As shown above, whether i play or not didnt make any real difference, i just wasted 10 mins of my life
  5. DFens_666

    Dark vs White theme and colors in the forum!

    Ok, since we are there: Does the forum rules need some updates? I literally read everything despite the 4. Dont Spam! part, because i wouldnt consider it to be Spam. Spam is useless in itself, but the person in question did write normal messages, which i wouldnt consider spam. Maybe you can give feedback to make a seperate point about the formatting. Because not writing in red is a seperate point by itself already, so that would fit together. Also an idea about the formatting: We have to click if we want to remove formatting - maybe it should be the other way around. If you want to keep the format, press the button? Or remove it alltogether...
  6. DFens_666

    Dark vs White theme and colors in the forum!

    Im not sure, where it says in the rules its forbidden to use rainbow colours in your posts? (just checked, didnt see anything in that regard) Its forbidden to use red colour, as its reserved for you mods. Therefor, banning someone seems kinda questionable, and this is on one of you mods Then just all formatting needs to go, since you can deliberately annoy others - regardless if they have normal forum theme (post in white) or dark forum theme (post in black?)
  7. I think BFT might be worth it AFT is totaly not tho. Good players dodge flak, thats why increase in flak burst damage is extremely useless. Manual AA seems to be the go-to skill, i might change that on some ships with the respec. Tried it only once on Alaska, with DefAA active -> planes died almost instantly In order to protect you from good CV players, you have to pump the continous damage as high as possible.
  8. DFens_666

    Is it worth it? to buy Dreadnought?

    Nope dont have Murmansk, but i think it would be even better, since Marbleheads range is really pisspoor. Got even worse after CE got nerfed to 10%
  9. DFens_666

    CV update?

    For me Hosho was hilariously OP even with autodrop only. I cant compare new CVs, but a quick look at average damage id say: New CVs are much worse on T4 than the old ones. Hosho was ofc much better than Langley because of the double TBs. That was basicly Permaflood at will, and even crossdrop possibility. And now flooding got changed too.
  10. DFens_666

    Is it worth it? to buy Dreadnought?

    If you wanna go for a Premium which you would play more often than occasionally, id go for T5. Atleast for me personaly, i wouldnt buy a T3 premium ship since i basicly wouldnt play it (ever). T5 ships are better, and i like Marblehead a lot (110 games played with it). But i wouldnt suggest getting her, its not that easy
  11. Maybe they found out that majority of people would dislike having a CV every match Btw, RTS CVs -> I wouldnt have mind actually. New CVs? I have to honestly say, i hate them Its worse than before in pretty much every way.
  12. What is the punishment btw? Him not liking us? Seems like a hefty price
  13. DFens_666

    Azuma coming in 0.8.2

    Im not sure if its worth to get tho... Dont have a link, but i think ive seen Flamu play a couple of games in between, looked really MEH in my eyes.
  14. Even on top of that, how should we all get Super Unicum stats, if half the team would need a very good match to achieve this? We would literally be stealing each others damage thus removing the possibility for Super unicum stats Well, Super Unicum WR ofc, but its like 1 game, so... getting 100% WR because its ony game hardly does anything to overall WR. Its kinda funny to meet a clan-div on your side, but lets not kid ourselves: This would get boring pretty fast. And we pretty much didnt even do anything together. Our div went left side, the others right side on Two Brothers. If he would went to check my Marblehead stats, he probably would say i use it to pad my stats We cant really force the game to put us in one team... not that we actually tried tho, it just happened.
  15. If people would be punished properly, then they would start to play accordingly A BB sitting in the back behind an island doesnt get any punishment - on the contrary, he can farm safe damage. He is the last one to be punished, might even survive if the enemies get 1000 points. On the other hand, a DD (or any other ship for that matter), which YOLOs in 3-5 mins into the game gets punished, but them dieing is not the punishment they need in order to stop that behaviour. They receive their 300-400 XP, which amounts to 2k over 20mins playtime - win or lose basicly. Then you have good players, trying to get a win by staying alive, playing for a total of 20 mins, getting 1,5-2+k XP depending if win or loss. Sure good players will get more out of it, because XP bonus stack. But bad players actually can receive more over time, if they just die instantly, and hop into the next ship. Thats seriously retarded....
  16. DFens_666

    CV rework failed every test it was set.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ First Yubari game today. But, as you can see, fun.exe missing. Constantly getting annoyed by CVs, not being able to do much.... And then i took myself out of the game because someone had to kill the DD which was borderhumping /smoked up
  17. Riiight... did you watch kots by any chance? Midway getting strikes through even with 4 ships grouped up together Didnt say it was constant, but it happened more than once from what ive seen. Did you actually see the 550k game? Its on YT, and he could have easily got >600k damage, but he fucked up some drops. Reroll = nope? HE spamming Cruiser = Man must i suck doing that.. how do i get the damage in tho? Ill get my division buddy in for the shittz and gigglz @ForlornSailor ah what the hell @Gojuadorai @__Helmut_Kohl__ @WolfGewehr the others arent active in the forum tho 55% Solo? Yeah, me being a newbie, sorry i couldnt start with 60% right away Ill go shame myself in a corner now Btw i dont play solo anymore, because Divisions are more fun. Nice try tho
  18. Well, no problem when you state things which are either well-known to be true, or you could look it up on the internet/book/whatever. (Fact is, the earth is round f.e.) But most of the time, people write "fact is" when they are talking about their own opinion / their own thoughts! These are clearly not facts, as noone can check if its true. Fact is, chocolate icecream is the most delicious one - sure some people will agree, but its not a fact because everyone has a different taste. Had a battle with my Z-39 couple of days ago where this just happened. Had a Nelson at 8km, and even the CV was only ~8km away behind an Island. If he wouldnt have spotted for the Nelson, i would have been able to get to him, but in order to get to him, i would have been full broadside to the Nelson... I managed to dodge for quite a long time (CV didnt hit me with bombs), but at some point, i was surface spotted by the Nelson and then he can just come in with Rockets and they are harder to dodge imo, might dodge most of it, but will still get some damage in. Died to the nelson ofc at some point, even tho i managed to juke a couple of his salvos. But at some point, you are just too close because you are dodging CV strikes every 10-15 secs ~
  19. Yep, this scenario suddenly happened couple of times within the first few days after a new class has been introduced, and never ever before in 3+ years of WoWs Clearly players being retarded and not broken mechanic... and sentences that start with "fact" are almost every time pure nonsense.
  20. Which is funny, since it still exists for the other classes, and DDs too Only that its not multi pen damage, its multi overpen damage now, so guess thats fine?! Unlike a Cruiser getting Pen + Citadel damage, making it lose like half his HP to one freaking bullet
  21. For me its a bit similiar: Play occasionally a couple of battles is ok. But then you get grinding missions like exeter half done and you feel like "I should just play a bit more to get it done" which makes it kinda frustrating at the same time. So i would like to have some time in between without grinding stuff aswell
  22. You do know you described why BB AP actually didnt need to get nerfed? The comparision between BB <-> Cruiser DPM would make sense, but you cant compare this to what a CV does. Its a totaly different mechanic, after all, i cant sit at 30km to a DD, spot him and shoot my guns right in his face (that would be comparable).
  23. DFens_666

    Can screen resolution effect aiming?

    For me its more like the inconsistency which leaves me baffled at times how the game wants me to aim... Especially those ships which are moving towards me. Sometimes i have to shoot 1km infront of them, which should just fall into the water but im lucky to hit it at all at the aft section (the ships ofc didnt even reach the point where i actually aimed at), and sometimes i have to aim right at the bow and i still hit the bow despite it coming closer Same for targets moving away from me. Occasionally i take a 3km lead to be able to hit it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (imagine doing that with spotter plane, there you see how retarded it is) I think it has to be in the game, because if i want to aim for the superstructure, you would actually shoot 2km behind the ship. Ive checked this by looking at the minimap after a ship disappears. The O-marker is WAY further behind. Even if you aim at the waterline, you have to lower the aim point if you want to blindfire, because reason?
  24. DFens_666

    In one battle, destroy three ships

    Go to coop with a 3-man division. Usually, you will spawn seperately from the others, and have 3 bots ahead of you, which should rush forward. Have your division leave the kills to you, profit
  25. DFens_666

    Can screen resolution effect aiming?

    Well, you didnt count on WG having installed an auto-aim correction build into their game. Somehow, when a target is not moving, it can happen that this thing likes to shoot below the ship. Try shooting a beached target -> shoots in the island for the same reason. Or a ship which is reversing, you have to aim higher for no apparent reason. So answer: Nope, screen resolution doesnt have anything to do with it. WG having retarded mechanics that occasionally can screw you over is the best answer. Also no. Salems guns are far superior to a Worchester. First, they are bigger caliber (203mm vs 152mm) and it has Super Heavy AP shells with improved pen angles. You are lucky, he didnt use AP. He would have blasted you out of the water in no time
×