-
Content Сount
13,162 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
11029 -
Clan
[CHEFT]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by DFens_666
-
CV problem and wargaming's lack of communication
DFens_666 replied to Nebel13's topic in General Discussion
Is it red aswell? -
Well imo the problem is, that even idiots can survive in CVs all day long. No problem if good CV players can survive most of the time. Good players in other classes can get a good survival rate aswell. Its not like, allof WGs mechanics are intuitive So i dont see an issue there You could have a CV moving at all times >3/4 speed to start planes, might work equally good. Either go in a straightline or dont start planes?
-
You could limit the capability of starting planes to the speed of the hull, i.e. If a CV is going full speed, it cant start any planes. That would allow other ships to catch up to the CV if they want to engage it. Oh god, i feal the hate coming for this "suggestion" Other option would be, to have a maximum range for planes, so CVs cant attack at 30 or 40km from their hull. Nah comrade, is gud and balans. CV highest damage and highest survivability = no problem, working as intended
-
We ran into one of them - 1GK with 4 Stalins. Was an EXTREMELY tight game, we entered 2 of their caps simultaneously when they had 996 points and we then won. Even managed to kill their CV (was the testseason). They tried to push very hard against us, but we managed to hold a cap/kite away. Just use FP/BOS/Module/Flags and its totaly fine. HE alpha even hurt less, except ofc for the big superstructure, but that shouldnt be a big problem unless you show full broadside all the time.
-
Yeah, im the DD gestapo The one who is spreading BS is youself here. When someone says, DDs are bad in shooting down planes, and your example is a PREMIUM DD, which has good AA (+ enemy Kaga seemed to be a retard ), which is supposed to "proof" that DDs are fine, then one can only facepalm to such nonsense. How many planekills you can shoot down, even in a low AA ship, is down to how stupid the enemy CV is. Especially if its Kaga with its paper planes. So you didnt prove anything with your 71 planekill kidd game.
-
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
DFens_666 replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Ive lost many 200k+ damage games ( including my best 275k game) Also remember one game, where we had 9 kills in our 2x Fiji division and we still lost. Getting a really got game and still lose is not uncommon. Because your team is so bad, that they dont deal damage themselves, leaves more damage for you. But if they die too fast, you cant kill the enemies fast enough to win the game. You cant always win if you did good. Also you cant always lose if you do bad. So over time, both of these games will be evened out. -
It does not, since you are referring to a premium DD So lets trash all Tech Tree DDs, and everyone can play Kidd, so noone has to whine! Also how come, you dont have a single plane kill in one of your other DDs from the past week? I thought, DDs are those plane shredder machines
-
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
DFens_666 replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
1. That fails most of the time anyway. You have a higher chanced to be matched against each other, than to be on the same team. And having 6 very good players on one side gets boring pretty fast (unless you are someone who gets himself off while looking at his WR only) 2. Why would this only work for or against certain people? I have games of all varietes: Very bad teammates which you cant carry, teams which you can carry, teams where you just do your normal stuff and win and games, where i could basicly be AFK and still win. -
CV problem and wargaming's lack of communication
DFens_666 replied to Nebel13's topic in General Discussion
If there is a game with 1x Lexington on each team, what is their WR after the game ends? How often do you see 2x Flints in one game on opposite sides? You basicly dont see a Flint often anyway, so the chance of having 2 in one game is extremely low. While CVs are always matched, and as i said before: There is a limited number of CVs, thus they will be drawn towards 50% WR. Either you have no idea what you are talking about, or you are deliberately playing dumb - pick one. -
CV problem and wargaming's lack of communication
DFens_666 replied to Nebel13's topic in General Discussion
I think Most T8 CVs are in the top 10 of T8 ships by damage WR is a mute point, since CVs are always matched, and the variety is very low. There are only 3 different CVs on each Tier except T8, so their WR tends to be towards 50% anyway. If one CV is winning, another one is losing, thus resulting in 50% WR for CVs -
Id like to add, Turrets tend to eat damage aswell. Doesnt necessarily get incapacitated / destroyed.
-
Just try to buy the thing you want to buy, and then it will change the Steel to Coal in the process. However: This is NOT RECOMMENDED, because Steel is of much more value than Coal. Should work this way, unless WG screwed up there too (they screwed the coupons lately aswell)
-
Where is the Hood from the personal assigment?
DFens_666 replied to Concrete_Potato's topic in General Discussion
Was like looking in the future (my brother is older than me) and then my father. I will be eventually as bald -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
DFens_666 replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Thats the problem... you cant use facts against them. Been there, didnt work Replay, we got first blood, but then we were down 4 ships i think. Looked really bad, but we fought back, and in the end we had 5 ships alive, and only enemy CV survived because time was up. One time, we were 3 (well, 4, we had an AFK Belfast...) vs 7 enemy ships -> still won the game, we killed everything. Skill matters 20190501_143143_PGSB506-Prinz-Eithel-Friedrich_17_NA_fault_line.wowsreplay -
Where is the Hood from the personal assigment?
DFens_666 replied to Concrete_Potato's topic in General Discussion
-
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
DFens_666 replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Because you have 63% WR. Has ofc nothing to do, that you are a better player at all We are just a bunch of lucky elitist clan players, who, for some weird reason, are getting lucky teams ALL THE TIME ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
DFens_666 replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
What do i have to do to get into this elite circle of lucky players, who always have favourable MM and are always grouped up together? For sure my teammates dont qualify (well, 9 of them, the other 2 are my division buddies)... You are calling MM rigged, yet are asking for rigged matchmaking, by pairing good players with utter noobs, and the other team will be more average. That would be rigged MM, since it wouldnt be random anymore. I dont want all the windowlickers in my team deliberately being put there by the matchmaker. Every game would be horrible. If my team would always consist of unicums only, i couldnt ever deal high average damage, since the others would take their share. This is how it looks, when you have a good team around you: You dont have to deal much damage, but neither could you. And this, when you have a crap team, and need to drag them to a win: -
Good to know Next time, ill just tell my teammates to NOT follow me, because i dont need them. At the same time, ill order my BBs to go to several different spots to get a good crossfire. It wont be a problem, since the CV cant kill all of them at the same time, only a couple have to sacrifice themselves, depending, who the CV will pick as a target. Ofc they need to be swift and punishing, otherwise the CV will win the damagerace and we all die and lose. But i guess we cant have everything Ill report back to you, how my teams handle my suggestion to not blob up
-
Tier X, all enemies stick together, I have a Cv. What do I do?
DFens_666 replied to Bartleby74's topic in Aircraft Carriers
I dunno... most of the battles ive played lately (with CVs in it ofc) even when winning the enemy CV survived basicly every time. Only if he made a mistake by not running away / hide in time, he died. Couple of days ago, on sleeping giant, all enemy BBs went to A. So we told our team, just push through C. Voila, enemy CV was infront of us, because he didnt go towards A in time. Enemies even had the guts to tell us, to report their CV... i told them, you abandoned him by going A collectively, so its their fault - not the fault of the CV so much. -
Tier X, all enemies stick together, I have a Cv. What do I do?
DFens_666 replied to Bartleby74's topic in Aircraft Carriers
Imagine you see the CV, try to kill him, and 99% of the time the game ends because points are full or time is up Happens literally everytime, thats why CVs basicly dont die unless they [edited]up themselves. -
CV problem and wargaming's lack of communication
DFens_666 replied to Nebel13's topic in General Discussion
You know what? Thats what i fear aswell WG doesnt need good players, afterall, they dont have to throw money at WG to play the game (for sure i dont). And ontop of that, good players keep killing those poor noobies, which make them have less fun playing Cruiseship-simulator. Guess thats why, IFHE is next one to be sledgehammered -
Tier X, all enemies stick together, I have a Cv. What do I do?
DFens_666 replied to Bartleby74's topic in Aircraft Carriers
4) Ask WG to fix CVs, so other ships dont need to form mega-blobs in order to have any chance to deny CV drops. RTS CVs, there was no blob meta. People werent bothered by CVs that much (probably because they only were around once every 10 matches or so), but the rework is "forcing" more and more people into playing CVs, thus making it worse and worse for surface ship players. Its like crap-domino, which keeps getting worse If the only option is "teamplay" then people will play like that. Blame CVs for that- 29 replies
-
- 12
-
-
-
Scroll down where the modules are
-
They couldnt ever fix that i guess... who said that they wanted to btw? Maybe it wasnt fixable, so they removed the pendamage from DDs as "compensation". I showed that like... months ago? Did a testing with GK vs Bot DDs. But they have to be moving/turning for it only then it works. Btw, other classes get this crap aswell. Ive had numerous times where one shell caused CItadel + Pen damage on my Cruiser, so fixing that would be really awesome Ofc BBs are least effected because you hardly ever even notice that, as you tend to hit enough shells so that any calculation gets mostly impossible. Had one instance with Musashi tho, where i did 33k damage on a Montana with 1 Cita, 2 Pens and 1 overpen.
-
if thats somehow true (link? Quote? something?), then they might aswell drastically lower the points needed to run a somewhat semiuseful secondary build. If you would run Manual Secondaries, IFHE, AFT, BFT that would be 15 points already, while having no other points left for other useful skills. (CE, SI, FP, BOS). If they dont want secondaries to be useful, then we might aswell remove captains alltogether, and be done with it There arent enough skills around anyway for having a lot of options imo.
