DFens_666

doesnt matter if it has the same DPM, if the others have vastly more HP than Benham. ALso Z-46 Hydro + Smoke, so it looks pretty bad for the Benham. Tashkent ofc struggles with the concealment in return. But taking a gunfight with Benham is not something you can do every time and expect to get away with it.

XMas boxes? Would be my bet.

I believe this aswell. 2 days ago i played Izmail, was a 1BB/CV/2DD game rest Cruisers. I didnt get one single citadel But on SEVERAL occasions, i got hit to torpedo protection on broadside !!! Cruisers Also i got 3 Ricochets on a not fully angled Budyonny (i have angle mod, it was >30 degrees). Btw, you know what that means: In that case, all my shells "conveniently" would have hit the citadel, but decided to ricochet In the end, i had like almost 50 hits for 66 k damage, absolutely rediculous. That game pushed me so far over the edge, i really consider to quit the game alltogether. It really felt like being cheated. Only thing keeping me in right now, is CBs because i started this season (wont leave my clan hanging) After that, i have to see tho Take any 203mm CA vs Omaha, same range you wont citadel it. You wont even Citadel an Omaha up to 4~5km i think. Stop bashing Smolensk - look at the mechanics instead Fix? Probably impossible with current mechanics. I mean, sure you could lower the fuse timer so that it would detonate inside, but that would cause problems against ships, which have a Citadel hidden behind layers. I guess you could move most citadels so that they could be reached, but that sounds like a lot of work for WG without any benefit....

Thats a 2-edged sword: If i go closer to spot, i also get spotted myself. If i sit in the back, i dont see anything but ill also not be seen. It might make pushing even worse, due to limited amount of targets presented, so everyone spotting that one ship will shoot it. Totaly agree with this one. Sometimes its just bad. Dont get this one tho. If BBs have less range than Cruisers, how does that help against a kiting Cruiser, aslong as that kiting Cruiser has someone spotting for him? Especially on higher tiers, that doesnt matter much, because BBs can migitate damage a lot against each other if properly angled. Yamato/Musashi can punish most BBs tho, even when angled. And on midtiers, maxrange sniping shouldnt really be an issue, because maps are smaller, and dispersion is really bad so you shouldnt receive hard punishment from those ranges. I think, T6 vs T8 is worst case here, then T7 vs T9.

God damn BBabies

Where is the sad reaction when you need it

I think the best option would be, to make Hightier BBs more like midtier BBs. Make them more vulnerable in general, so you cant just sit bow in, but you would also need to nerf the accuracy a little bit, otherwise it might be too punishing. Maybe just make the Bow/Aft weaker, so BBs can overmatch each other, but leave the upper belt as it is (or make the upper belt overmatchable by Yamasushi, so they retain their uniqueness). Proper angling would still be rewarded, while sitting bow-in would be punishable. Positive sidenote: Better for Cruisers too

Descriminating CV players!!!!11 Off to gulag you go I mean, the 2nd one is rather easy to fix, nerf BBs

I feel we already have this here aswell... Certain missions come up, you tend to see stupid gameplay more often.

Some missions would be too easy to do in Coop. People, who play mostly PvP would just hop into Coop to do them. (which some do even right now). But if you would allow all to be done in Coop, then it might just be too easy. If you dont know: You dont have to do all Campaign missions, you can do one several times and collect the stars you need. Unless you want to do all, then you have to do them in Randoms.

Why adjust them if you can put them in XMas containers for more Personaly, i consider Musashi to be the worst offender of those 3. Kronshtadt is hardly OP, especially compared to Alaska.

Uhm, yes, thats why you dont get a punishment for it? Why would you get punished, if you didnt actually leave the game? By removing the "back to port"-button, what would change in this situation? No, thats not at all what im saying. If the game crashes, you shouldnt get punished for it, because you still can get back into it by restarting the game. If you lose your connection once in a blue moon, do you mind getting a minor penalty, which is basicly 2 games being pink - nothing more! If you keep losing your connection all the time, should you keep playing? Afterall, its not guaranteed that you can play anyway... Couple of weeks ago, we had some issues with electricty, i simply decided not to play. And you would still receive a minor penalty first, so if you keep going, i think you deserve to get punished. Removing the "back to port"-button, has nothing to do with the above mentioned issues. In neither of those, you would leave the battle, as you can always rejoin it.

If your game/internet crashes, you dont leave the game. If you can restart the game, you will get back into it. Atleast for client crashes, this is no problem. If you have connection issues, thats ofc another story. But should you mind a punishment then? Dont think its that bad. Unless you keep playing when you know, your connection is not stable, then i think being punished is viable, because you are willingly putting a strain on your team. If you have an emergency in reallife, i dont think you mind if you are pink for 2 games Or as ive said earlier: Ban them from Randoms/ranked for 1h. Repeat offenders should receive harsher penalties.

If you open the map with "M" you can set an autopilot with up to 5 waypoints.

I think after the GC incident, they said, they wont nerf premiums as the community doesnt like that. Ships like Smolensk are not bound to the same standard tho. Thats what they said aswell.

Also 12k baseXP in CVs Glorious WG missions to show: People like and play CVs And ofc cant do them in Operations (like normaly)

I dont think it does if you set an autopilot. I tried that in coop once, set my GK autopilot, left to port. In the end, i rammed a BB Also, the example made in the OP, did set his autopilot somewhere and left the game (apparently). Atleast he said, he would leave and basicly yoloed in. Ofc he might not have quit the game, i guess noone can really know this. Alt+F4 takes much more time tho. So maybe some people would think twice to quit the battle. Ill put some more stats from the guy, who was used as an example in the OP I think its quite obvious what he is doing. He plays T8-9 if he is lowtier, he doenst accept it and quits the battle. Suddenly, T10 he can participate? Its quite obvious imo. And he has 7k games, with 1k coop games. Doesnt look like he is getting punished a lot for it, if he really leaves the battle. But that just highlights another problem with the game, which goes unpunished. Ofc it might be, that they used to go back to port, got punished for it, and now they just yolo suicide instead. Equally worse, doesnt get punished. Guess we cant fight res

Didnt they nerf the reload when they added the MBRB? Im sure they did so for the others, maybe HIV came later tho... not sure anymore. The Hindenburg nerf was rediculous anyway. They buffed the direct competition (Zao/HIV) at the same time. There was no need to nerf the Hindenburg. They buffed it 2 times afterwards, instead just admitting that the initial nerf was stupid.... but thats too much to ask i guess

Is russian ship comrade, everything is broken HE, Armor, AP ... Russian bias is overused, no wonder WG doesnt care about it.

Well, you can report them to support if they openly admit what they are doing. However, would you report someone, who has plotted his autopilot to the center of the map and dies after 3 minutes? Guess not, because there is no base for doing it, he might just be stupid. Or he might have quit the game and entered the next one instead... Would really like to now, if you get punished for leaving the battle while having autopilot activated. Clearly, you are not marked as AFK, thats for sure.

It is fixed... according to WG They made T4 CVs so popular, that player numbers show: Rework is a success. There will be no balancing or other changes to CVs, as they said its final, and we havent had any changes for a couple of patches either.

I can show you how to rip a Kremlin apart in a Mino Lost like >90k HP in 30 seconds. Only 3 torps, rest guns

Id prefer one of these 2 options: - Get rid of it all together or - Make Detonations equal for every class. Imo its bad game design, that DDs detonate more often, by what reason? Because they are smaller? This needs to go in favour of game balancing. All should have the equal responsibility to mount anti-deto flag. This goes ofc for CVs too, there is no reason, that CVs shouldnt be able to detonate. They can also mount 8 signals now, so no problem to use anti-deto flag. And by WGs own logic, CVs should be allowed to detonate anyway, since they "achieved their goal" (they didnt, but they say so) to bring match influence back in line for CVs according to other classes. So they can also get detonated imo.

Huh? I guess you have trouble understanding what im writing (talking about being confused?) - Did you, or did you not blame his DDs? here is your quote, incase you got confused: Thats why i asked you "Is the BENHAM to blame, if his IBUKI is torping him from behind? Obviously you think it is his fault, otherwise you wouldnt blame his DDs. And apart from that: Benham or Mogador puhsing Benham + Z is not something you will not get away with, unless the opposite DDs are noobs. Ive had a Mogador trying to get in the same cap as me in my Fletcher. Lets say, he lost 3/4 of his HP while i lost 0... Sure, he could have pushed harder, eventually getting killed and maybe doing minor damage to me (smoke ready + i had backup) I keep getting quoted... Lets go back a page and see who brought the french stuff up again, shall we? Oh, it was you... So stop telling others about pushing the discussion somewhere. I already said, we can stop it. Obviously you dont like to drop it, while telling others they derail this thread. Dont think so, because it looks like this to me. Because reworked CV numbers are so much higher than RTS Last 2 months 2 months prior to rework eh yeah... try again? CV were hardcapped before the rework aswell, ofc it was necessary. If there happened to be 4 T8+ CVs in the queue, they might have been put into the same game.

Big surprise, ofc majority of the playerbase has to grind to the max to get the desired item. I wouldnt be surprised at all, if WG would put Genova on 1st slot for some more players so they can say "everything is RNG, you were unlucky THIS time, but MAYBE NEXT TIME you get lucky" If you would include places 17-19, you would end up with almost 42,5%!!