DFens_666

Nah, those cant strike you at will, thats the difference. Ive killed DDs literally at the 1 minute mark. No Cruiser or Torpedo can do that.

Yes, they expire. You get 2 new ones for Signals/Camos, thats why you have 2

I can totaly understand that Do you see this WG? @MrConway @Crysantos @Tanatoy @Sehales I dont think, he is the only one that feels that way... Well, you do have a point But i rather hope they atleast try to learn the basics first... sometimes it works.

eh wut? He has 360 games, he has no business playing T8+. He can learn enough by playing Midtiers. If he goes to T8+, he will have a bad time himself and for his teammates around.... Actually, after looking his stats, he should drop down to T4 again and just learn from there.

Ranked just now nuff said

Yeah, clearly only because of Smolensk Funnily enough, in the 2 ranked games i played, enemies had 2 Smolensk each time while we had none. Won both matches easily

4 BBs last night on Land of fire Needless to say we got facerolled The Monarch from C said at the beginning: Watchout for the T9-10 ships... you immediately know, you are in the crap 2 games later on Tears of the desert... When half the enemy team is like, we dont want the objective (epicenter) we go to the corner of the map, and your team is like "HOLD MY BEER" Literally every enemy ship has full HP ofc. Even the Iowa which rammed our Vladi to death came back with >50k

Its not like, you are getting Commander XP/Free XP for free while playing Premium ships. Not to mention, you can use any captain you like, and you earn more credits aswell. Ive never been bothered by the "useless" XP i cumulated on Premium/Elite Ships. I liked to play them, that should be enough reward to play those ships.

Probably a master in not getting tagged for being AFK

I better not post what i said to one guy in Twilight battles. Even that didnt give me 10 days chat ban That was like 100x worse what you said to him Yesterdays game (the Massa obviously) Funnily enough, a GEORGIA with 53% is the one with 202 baseXP and was even more useless. How do you even...

I mean that, only skill of CV player matters if he engages me. If he is bad, he takes my Flak. If my ship doesnt have much flak, he probably will get through but might not be able to get a good drop in. If CV player is good/Unicum, he will get drops in regardless of AA skills, and even is able to counter my dodging to some degree.

Ive never used Hindy LM and i never will. I just dont see it having any use whatsoever. Sounds nice that you dont get much fire/flood damage, but those are not the main sources of damage you take. Its AP alpha, HE alpha or Torp alpha. So while you dont burn for a long time, you will get focused longer since its harder to disengage. I guess if Hindy would have Moskva-grade armor, then it would be usefull

Maybe the 1 in 20 point i tried to make wasnt clear. I meant, maybe 1 in 20 games you will get a win with a secondary build instead of a tankbuild, but in return, you will lose some games where you could have won with a tankbuild. Im almost certain of it. Sure, you will/can use secondaries more often than that. But you most likely will win those games with a tankbuild aswell. And the most important perk is FP imo. As i said, most people can and will focus your superstructure. So you rarely get more than 1 fire. If you do, you can still DCP it. It almost never happens, that i get 2 permafires because i DCPed 2 while playing any BB with tankbuild. If it happens, its almost guaranteed a BB shooting HE, because of the spray. The other important perk is BoS, since it reduces fire/flood duration by 15%. You can both measure the impact of those 2 perks. Less burn time / less fires on your ship.

Sure, by now they have inserted a couple of more Crayon boxes and Glue bottles into their nose

I want to join the lottery and

They are almost identical Stalingrad Moskva Difference is, citadel armor is a little bit less on Moskva (imo often doesnt really matter, i guess Hindenburg is one that actually struggles more with Stalingrad because of the abysmal pen) and Stalingrad has the "nose" infront of the Citadel armor which is supposed to "prevent" frontal citadels - doesnt always tho. Actually just found out, that Moska has thicker plating on the bow/aft citadel plating and the citadel torpedo bulkhead. Not to mention, stalingrad is even clumsier and has worse concealment. But i think the most important parts are basicly the same, and thats the 50mm bouncing every AP shell.

But the other way around its ok, gotcha

Ive had the same thought some time ago, and i think it would be nice for a special scenario or event. Like a team of 3 could man one BB, one is for mainguns, the 2nd for secondaries and the 3rd for AA. Movement could even be automatic, or the guy who is using mainguns could steer the ship. For a special event, you could make enough targets so that everyone has something to do (big ships for the mainguns, small torpedoboats for the secondaries and enough planes so the AA guy has something to do aswell), for Randoms i dont think it would really fit.

Actually i believe the game is doing worse than ever. Players seem to be constantly dropping since 2016. Slowly, but it does indicate something. Sure you get huge spikes every year, but those spikes are getting smaller aswell. Also the recent events indicate, WG is trying everything to keep players in the game / get new players into (paying people to get more people to play f.e.)

Stalingrad citadels Smolensk like no tomorrow

Sure they can, but ive seen too many people NOT shoot because they are... well average playerbase. And if you are sitting behind an island yourself, you should be pretty safe too. And most of the time, the Radar Cruiser is closer, so he is the biggest threat if he can shoot. BBs dont get AP pens anymore, so they deal much less damage aswell. Receiving little damage is not the end of the world, not even for a DD. Also, the disadvantage of having Radar is basicly being a squishy Cruiser. Sitting behind an island entire game waiting for radar while not shooting also seems like a favourable way to win games and get good XP (not). And about the Islands: Well, some caps might not have any islands, but those caps might also not have a Radar Cruiser sitting there. And not every game has as many radar Cruisers anyway, so for certain you will get caps where no Radar is camping at.

If they sit behind an island, that means they are guarding a cap. If they sit there, they cant shoot you. Touch the cap [edited]in and run away. Or go in the cap, sit behind an island. If radar is down, you are good to go... get the cap i mean. The easiest way to learn to deal with Radar cruiser is, to play them yourself. Most DD players dont do that, and they rather complain instead. The problem is, bad players panic when they are radared. They are safe behind an island, but when they get radared, they run away from safety just to get shot at.

Maybe you arent supposed to be able to beat every situation you face? (i mean, DDs can still do it ofc). Try to spot the Radar Cruiser, let your team handle it. If they cant well... then maybe you arent supposed to win Chapa is the most annoying 12km radar ship, because it can stealth radar, but in return its pretty squishy. Donskoi/Moskva/Stalingrad all have worse concealment than Radar range. God forbid, Cruisers are allowed to have any game influence at all. They are basicly like BBs in that regard. Without radar probably worse.

You must have forgotten that AA actually did something back then. Not to mention DefAA... No, because good CV players cant be fend off. Noob CVs are annoying at best, they wont get much damage in. Worst thing is, that they keep me spotted so they ruin my game regardless. If you meet a good CV player, you can just bend over and let it happen, there is NO escape. If i meet a good player in any other class, i can work around it, and make life harder for him. Not for CVs tho...

Where is the facepalm reaction if you need one...