DFens_666

Well, guess someone was lazy with the wiki then and only updated the pen damage

I thought healable citadel damage didnt get changed? only pen damage https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Repair_Party_Data also what the wiki tells me. Citadel 10% Any pens/overpens 75% Fire/flood/ram 100%

Are you talking about yourself here? Must be quite an achievement to get stats like that No game impact, survives half the time but has decent PR. Rarely see that actually! This is a game, not reality. If its benefitiary for the game, realism has to take a backseat. Otherwise, CVs would rule the seas (more than they do know...)

Doesnt make it more fun tho...

You might even say, people actively avoid teamplay, so others cant get kills (or something else). Like radaring DDs. Why? ive heard of 2 incidents now, that a radar ship didnt want to radar, because "someone else will get the kill" At this point, every mission requirement should be "in a victorious battle do xxx" That might not do much, but maybe a little bit... hopefully?

Conqueror has special heal, it can heal way more than most other ships. Basicly the Flood/Fires are worth 0, thats what he will heal with 1/2! of 1 of his repair parties. From the HE shells, he will heal 75%, so like 8,5k Now for the torps, it really depends. If you hit the midsection, he can only heal 10% of it. But if you hit the Bow/Aft, he can heal 75% of the damage. Also, hits to the midsection on the torpedo belt deal less damage, while hits on the Bow/aft deal full damage but with saturation kicking in basicly after 1 torp hit. Even with other BBs, you can tank rediculous amounts of damage, Ive had 160k in GK once.

I dont remember exactly, but one time we lost 3 (or potentially even 4 ) BBs within the first 5 mins of the game. It was 2 GKs and a Conqueror (afaik) + potentially some T8 BB. Yeah... if it wouldnt be so sad, it would be funny. I remember those GKs, they just yoloed into D cap on Sleeping giant, while the other BB, i think, died on A. And the 4th BB also died on D cap

FTFY. Those arent made by accident. Im almost 100% sure they make those on purpose, then remove them and put them into XMas boxes. Enterprise anyone? Also, you think those ships happen to be the most famous/known once by accident? Belfast, Missouri, Enterprise... Could even add Musashi in there Then something like Kutuzov (atleast a russian ship that actually existed). Or look at the first premiums like Tirpitz. Everyone knows that ship. If they would put a fake ship in there, why should anyone buy that? (sure some would, but if you can relay to something, it makes more sense to just buy it) I guess the lower tier removed ships are just there to fill gaps, and noone really cares that much if they are OP or not.

There is really no other option. And VU is pretty much garbage. Better play Pyotr, thats probably even better than GC.

I think we have been saying that for years, yet it gets worse all the time. Its like teamwork between WG and bad players both saying "hold my beer" PR grind - nuff said

Play Vladi? https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/File:Владивосток_wows_main.jpg

"Can be" doesnt mean will be. Sure they can do whatever they want. They could release it as premium, techtree, buff it, nerf it or dont do anything at all. Simple fact however: There is no indication that anything will happen with it. And i dont think anything will. If they do an Italian BB tree, they will probably make another ship for those tiers.

Thought about that too, but then i dont get his complaint about Scharnhorst, where he has 68% WR

Doesnt really look like it tho? more average damage/kills in Yorck compared to Fiji. WR is kinda irrelevant because of the small smaple size. 35% in Yorck with 56 games is probably unlucky - even if you perform very poorly. And not sure if 47% in Fiji is justified with those numbers around it. So you were just more lucky with Fiji, which isnt a big surprise with only 38 games played. While i do think, Fiji is stronger than Yorck (its considered to be amongst the top T7 Cruisers), doesnt mean that you are automatcally awesome with it. If you misplay, you will die just as easily.

It was the test version of GC to put it on T6. WG tried to "balance OP" premium ships by uptiering them - community hated it so they dropped that idea and said, they wont nerf/change premiums directly. So its just a testship, wont be released ever (?).

Hey, ive told WG to remove fighters from CVs, thats way worse than what you did

Last thing they said was, Next Coal/Steel ships are barely in testing right now, so probably a few months till we get a new one.

Imo 1st choice Bourgogne 2nd Stalingrad 3rd Somers Unless you really like to / dont like to play a certain class. F.e. if you dont like playing BBs, dont take Bourgogne, or if you want a DD take somers. I dont really feel Flint is a ship that one needs these days. Especially if you have Atlanta. Black is still strong with the Radar, but those seamines... i mean torps Unless you really need a looong time to collect the remaining ~10k steel for one of those TX ships. Then you should probably take a cheaper one.

well, they fit here perfeclty. 1 already pink, other one shot his teammate at the start So we dont have to fear, that we suddenly get players that know how to play...

He meant Philippe Auboyneau https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Ship:Unique_Commanders Which you can have aswell if you got him for tokens.

People in the forum often complain, that players camp with their BBs (or other classes too ofc) behind islands and avoid fighting. Now a Bot got stuck doing the same and thats supposed to be funny. If Bots would sit in smoke, turn away, angle or dodge - that wouldnt be funny wouldnt it?

Ill check tomorrow, maybe i can find a screenshot. Have had bots torping teammates (on my team ofc) and turning Pink... bad bot, guess he will learn his lesson playing Coop only!!

You think i havent seen pink bots yet?

Thats something i dont think which actually happens often. From people using MM-monitor, it looks like ~20 out of 24 are average or below. Sometimes can vary a bit depending if there are unicum divisions around, but most of the time its just red-yellow-orange. What i dont understand is, that ive seen totaly different behaviour even from players with equally bad WR (not to mention totaly stupid crap from people with good WR). Are there a few ultra bad people who basicly throw their other bad teammates under the bus? I often see lots of players like to follow others, so they think they are kinda safe. Maybe they just follow those YOLO DDs into certain death? Otherwise i couldnt explain the things ive seen. Not to mention, almost every game i play in 3x division these days ends up in my team losing 2-4 ships first (sometimes we can work against that a little bit by also getting couple of kills in early, depeding on what the enemies do). Rolfstomping the enemy team feels kinda rare these days, and i can but wonder, how those games would be if the 3 of us would be replaced by other 45% players. Game would end in 7 mins all the time? I mean, if i look at my last 25 games showing up in wows.numbers, there are like 2-3 where i didnt do much but we still win. Technically one of those 3 is a superhardcarry from my division mates, so clearly not a faceroll victory (i actually expected a loss), while the one Scharnhorst game i didnt do much damage, but i got a cap and a stupid yolo DD just rushed me with torps (he died too). Which leaves 1 game out of 25 which probably was a very easy win. But other games? What more can i do? The 50% Buffalo was a 160k damage loss btw, and the other was 112k win.