DFens_666

So because someone who dies before the first 5 mins gets like 600 XP instead of 400, people who carry their asses of for wins should basicly never get >2k XP? At best we are talking even like 1500-1700 XP, which usually ends up in the ~2500 region with a win. Nah, if you want to punish suiciders, lower the XP if you die that early. They dont deserve the XP they get. People who play at the maximum for the entire battle deserve their >2k BaseXP. And btw, those people are bad, they profit regardless if they die early, because they are incapable of getting high Base XP. Speed-YOLO-grinding ftw!

Which is totaly exaggerated. Can happen? Definetely. If it wouldnt, BBs could just push in and delete everything at will. And lets not forget, that BBs have a higher avg damage than Cruisers, which often includes firedamage, which is worth less than the AP damage from BBs.

There is no HE saturation - Saturation is area dependant and regardless of the thing hitting you. Its only more prevelant with HE shells, as they either pen or Shatter. And overpens never cause saturation. For Example, If your superstucture is somewhat saturated, you will get half damage from pens, regardless if its HE pen or AP pen or rockets. The problem with CVs is, that some of their attacks ignore the saturated areas and hit parts, which have no saturation. AP bombs hitting the citadel will always cause full damage. Torps hitting the central part will always deal full damage - torpedo protection. Even fully saturated areas will always receive 0,1x (overpen) damage from penetrations.

Id be happy if we get rid off the worst offenders: - Suiciding with your CV - Running into a corner - Constantly sitting behind an island in your spawn with a BB - Leaving battle/Stop playing/suiciding because game is "lost" - YOLO/not playing when lowtier ... probably some more

I just really dont like this "you can play however you want". Atleast the worst scenarios are covered by rules, but i think everyone should contribute in a meaningful way - otherwise there is Coop. I think its moraly wrong to play a game with other people and dont give a crap. In a game interacting with people IRL, noone would act like that, because quite frankly, noone would play with them anymore or worse even... Try playing football with others and starting throwing the ball into the goal with your hands - see if the others will like it.

Well, it really isnt

Ok ok, i got this Number 1 And number 2 - well i died aswell, but still

Its 175.000 coal for all of those, so Sansonetti is close to that, some will get him cheaper, some might pay a bit more. Also 25*6000 is 150.000 not 800k+

I see what you did there: You want to see, if 10 BBs sitting behind an island would have enough mass to cause the island to orbit around those BBs Well, but thats not how i feel. Granted, i only play division since a couple of years, but that atleast gives me the desired outcome for my input. Also i dont see, why someone having sub 40% WR in TX deserves to get artificially moved close to 50% despite doing nothing? Then you might aswell remove winning/losing alltogether... How does that work out, if you want everyone to have 50%WR give or take a couple of %. I could start sitting in the corner, doing nothing for my team and still get close to 50% WR, because at some point, MM will put good players in my team who will carry my [edited]

Its literally impossible to need 400k Coal to get it 240k is a rough estimate for the maximum youll need in 99,99% of the cases. I wish id have the link where WG did the math oh well.. was on reddit IIRC https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/205655-finished-the-resolute-and-rapid-collection/ Someone got it with 24... thats 144k Coal! And thats more likely than needing 240k Coal btw. ah got it, btw the exchange rate is 4:1 contrary to what it said in the news back then there is a really high chance, that Sansonetti is cheaper to obtain than the others for 175k Coal.

If it doesnt matter how i play regarding the results, why play at all? If i suck, i get almost 50% WR, because ill have others carrying me. If im good, ill get slightly above 50% WR, because ill get bad players on my team all the time. So whats the incentive to play? This is a PvP game afterall, so its natural that skill should matter, as its a competition between players. If im good, i wanna get rewarded for that, not get screwed because of it.

You think you will get only 3 collection items and 68 duplicates? During the event, the maximum amount of containers you could get was (4 free) (+ i believe we got 2 as compensation) But with those 38 containers the mathematical chance was >98% IIRC (what WG calculated themselves) So lets say you need 40 containers, which is 240k coal. But in reality, its actually less than that. If you would need 30 Containers, you would look at 180k Coal, a good estimate is somewhere between those 2 numbers.

Have you looked at your own post once in a while? Lets do that, shall we? I fail to see an arguement from your side... Especially regarding the matchmaker. Every arguement from the other side, you disregard or even say that its wrong. Where are the arguements, why MM needs to be changed to what you want? You didnt even say what you want in the first place! What should we discuss with you, we dont even know what your point was.

How about you stop putting quotes together and not put words into other peopls mouths? The first part is about BBs, the latter is about RN CLs. Fuso T6 IJN BB: 261936 DPM Amagi T8 IJN BB: 252000 DPM *edit* Fuso has more guns and faster reload than the Amagi, and if you are leander, neither of those has issues overmatching most of your armor. Even worse, Fuso has better armor which makes it harder for you to fight it But keep blaming the game, that will help you down the road to T10. But hey, maybe we get another one to complain about when we are mowing through the hords of noobs as you are putting it yourself

So because people are defending this MM, you dont have fun playing this game... that must be level 1000 logic, i wonder, what came first, you complaining about MM or we telling you how we see it?

Everytime i got a chatban for 3 or 7 days, i can fully say that its deserved every time. So you should rethink what you are writing...

Most likely Venezias survivability. Brindisi is in line with other CAs, while Venezia is not. And last time i checked it was like 52%, now its almost 54%, so people get even better at not dying. 2nd best silver TX CA is Goliath with 43% survivability, all others are <40% except Zao with 41%. However, i consider SAP to be a broken concept, and i think it should get removed from the game. Guess Italian BBs with SAP gonna be fun

Armor doesnt really mean much for Cruisers. Fiji has basicly the same armor than Leander, and Edinburgh through Minotaur have slightly better armor, with the T9-10 having Citadels like twice the size of the others. The biggest difference for Leander/Fiji compared to the T8+ RN CLs, is that they get overmatched by 203mm Cruiser AP (but most people dont know that so eh). But against BBs, it doesnt mean anything. A T5 BB will be equally devastating than a T8 BB. However, armor from hightier BBs actually works in favour of Leander: T7-8+ BBs are build more around the all-or-nothing armor scheme, thus their armor is usually very thin, except at the armored belt (which doesnt matter anyway for RN CLs). So you will be able to inflict more damage to them. Also in regards of RN CLs, your shell damage stays the same till the end. The only thing that changes, is that they get more firepower either by having more barrels or faster reload.

You will get a certain amount of toptier matches guaranteed by MM, but you need to play a certain amount for it to function. And the problem with that is, that the higher you go, the more players you get, its simple math that you cant be toptier that often (noone can). If most people play T10, and it drops going down, naturally you will be lowtier more frequently. However, that wasnt always like that, like a year ago playing T8 you were literally 80%+ lowtier. Which actually wasnt a big problem, but people kept whining so WG changed the MM. Now people whine about facing T8 ships on T6 and T8-9 ships on T7 - which actually is a bigger problem than T8 ships facing T10... If you swap Amagi for Fuso and Asashio for Fubuki, you would have gotten less XP. And rewards for damage are percentage based: 22k on a BB is like ~4k on a DD. Well yes, because RN CLs are amongst the hardest ships to play properly, but their potential is good if you know how to. Its not a line for beginners, so its expected that you struggle with them.

You assume, that we only play T10 all day long only because we have those ships - which is wrong. Here a list of my battles by tier T8, which was most of the time (only recently it got slightly better) considered to be THE worst tier in the game, is my most played one. Also id like to add, that single tier MM actually favours good players. Why? Here an example: 1 Good and 1 Average player face each other with different scenarios: - The good player is Toptier, clearly he has the upper hand, as he is the superior player and has a stronger ship - Both players are same tier, the good player has still the advantage, because well, he is still the better player. - The average player is toptier, this levels the playing field, since now the average player has the better ship. While the better player might outplay him, he has to put more effort in and potentially loses more health or he might even die. So if an average player is toptier, he has occasionally the change to perform better, while even tier MM he would always struggle against superior players. edit: well i essentially wrote what @ColonelPete said...

Because we know nothing will change? You could write till your hands blead - WG will not listen to you, me or anyone else. Believe me, we all have written tons of ideas how to improve this game - literally nothing happens. Well, one time when >90% of the community wanted something, WG did change that after like 6 months or so, so that should tell you something. And why we are answering the way we do right now: Because if you ask for help, you would get better answers (from the same people btw) and ultimatively, thats the only thing which will change your attitude. If you throw in the towel before anything happened, thats entirely on you. If you think, its frustrating to be -2tier ship in a battle, we cant help you with that. The only thing we can do, is to help you understand the things you dont understand right now, but that requires you to want to learn in the first place...

Im not gonna quote any specific part, will just answer the various things in your post - You cant compare those games the way you do it here. In WoWs, you play a T5 ships, the enemies also have a T5. Thats why its not imbalanced. You arent fighting T7 ships when you are a T5 ship, there is another T5 ship on the other side aswell. You do better than him, you have a better chance to win on average. - Fighting higher tier ships if possible in wows, but if you do it on their terms, sure you will lose. You simply lack experience to do it correctly. If you want an enjoying experience, you have to analyse your mistakes and find out what works and what doesnt. Your claim "fighting highertier ships is impossible" is simply not true, and for those who are willing to learn game mechanics its not impossible. - Fighting higher tier ships gets you more XP, so what you asked for already exist. - You were comparing sizes of ships: Lowertier ships are smaller in size than highertier ships, thus its actually more likely that shells will not hit your ship. We kinda tried that in a training room, with a T9 ship shooting a T5 one, its very hard to hit. - Going up through tiers wont help you if you dont learn the basics. You think, if you are a T10 ship, you will automatically win... couldnt be further away from the truth. A good player in a T8 ship will defeat a badly played T10 ship. So its still about personal skilla and knowledge about game mechanics. - You said, you played a lot of games, well maybe WOWs is not for you then... also, this is a f2p game, you dont have to pay anything to play it, unlike lets say Diablo2, which you needed to buy. - This game is not p2w, and im a f2p player. I dont feel betrayed by those who want to invest money - there are far worse games out there than this one.

Maybe they just didnt thought about it? Raptor cant move until its repaired, so they just set the engineer to move close to Raptor. Thats why i asked, if someone actively pushed raptor away from its spawn. You cant just tell WG to fix "something" when that something doesnt have anything to do with the autopilot.

@SEN_SEN_Channel_Portugue can you check the replay if someone pushed Raptor away from its initial location? Because the mission says "escort the engineer to raptor" which never succeeds, because raptor is not where its supposed to be, and the engineer just waits for it a few km behind. Raptors engine doesnt get repaired either, so he cant move. Might not be an autopilot bug, might be player error? (doesnt make it right ofc, but that way it could be narrowed down)

https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/12 Ofc its always subject to change, but it should get the 38mm. Just wait till tuesday for patchnotes then it should be clear if it happens or not.