DFens_666

If everyone would be like el2a, they would atleast see how broken CVs are (or not, and we would all quit the game)

Which makes it kinda sad, doesnt it? Any game which would require direct interaction with other people, and they would get beaten up for the way they "play".

Actively throwing games / not participating is against the rules. And i think that counts as such. Better make a support ticket and/or tag the usual suspects here (Conway/Sehales...)

If you arent happy with 60% Solo WR, i guess you need to play in 3x divisions...

I wish my kutuzov would wotk like that Looks like anti-fire build works. I even DCPed 1 fire, because i got into cover/unspotted, so why let it burn? And before someone claims i camp in the back And i was a Bourgogne.

would be kinda OP if BBs would get immune to certain types of damage because they take the right moduls/skills FP reduces 2 superstructure fires to 1, so that always works. Most of the time, people aim at the superstructure, so it makes a difference. Meanwhile, BoS and the DCP mod in the 4th slot reduces fire/flood duration by 15%, so that also works. Lowering the firechance like the DCP mod in 2nd slot is something you can hardly measure, as you can always receive multiple fires from one salvo.

Sounds good to me. Sometimes you meet some familiar people in a battle, and they dont respond because they are chatbanned...

You dont even understand to what that reaction was. my XXXD LOL was towards his "i want other teammates", or do you think i can write that within half a second, since thats basicly when it popped up after my division mate wrote it. Only because they are in that order, doesnt mean that they have to do anything with each other. He replied to the Amagi, i replied to the Amagi, because its funny that he wants worse teammates so he can lose. Watch the replay... Didnt know posting names is statshaming? Do you even understand the wort STATshaming? It has to include some form of stats you know? Neither here nor in the other threat did i write ANYTHING about his stats. I didnt even say his WR, only after you repeatedly claimed we statshamed him with the "45%" i corrected that, by saying, he actually doesnt have that WR. Im willing to help everyone who wants to learn. That guy (and the one on the red team) are a lost cause. They claim, WR is a useless metric (which is mostly why i put that in this thread btw), so they will never understand their own shortcomings. They will continue to blame their team, and they dont want to learn anything about this game (see players comment about what Amagi is supposed to be).

I think he means more like, that CVs in CBs made everyone pick Venezias and Stalingrads. And they are forced into playing a certain way. The CV does nothing, but AP bomb Stalingrads / torp Venezias, sitting in the back of the map. There are no situations where you have to react differently. There is no use picking other Cruisers even. Also a DD player outplaying another DD player can be compensated for by the Cruiser players around him.

Not saying that its a bad idea, but i think WG wont do it. I even think, exchanging steel for coal isnt as bad as it used to be. The steelships they introduced arent that special tbh? I wont get Shikishima f.e., its just a worse Yamato in my book. Also wont get Somers, so im sitting on 23k steel, and nothing in sight to spent it...

so... how many people will do that actually? And where does it end? Not to mention i didnt say anything about his stats, what if someone else (who was not my divmate) would have attacked him? Is that also statshaming from me? also did you shame yourself now, because i said i was reported and you admitted doing it? Or is that my fault aswell 2 insults right there. insult claiming something i didnt do, which is also insulting.

Your first post was nothing but insults here, are you for real?! Also, neither of us knew his stats, its evident the way he played/what he said that he actually has <50% WR. So it can hardly be described as statshaming, when you dont actually know the stats? (btw you can check, he doesnt actually have 45% WR, but 49%) And he STILL started it. He wrote in open chat "i want other teammates", why would we say anything at that point? Im pretty sure, noone said anything for a couple of minutes before that... the incident about not-tanking was halfway through the game. Also, there cant be statshaming here, since i removed the names... you only know it because you were in the game.

I think that ship has sailed. WG just removed all non-TX steel ships. I assume, that only TX ships will be steel in the future. If you feel the amount of steel is too high, you can ofc use the Steel to supplement your coal. While most people say "dont do it" i think its always as clearcut. For people, who wont get ~20k steel in a reasonable time, i dont think its a useful resource to gather.

those 2 modules for anti-fire. And BoS/FP for captain skills (just showcasing which are good for anti-fire, the whole build is missing ofc SI/CE before those)

We carried his [edited]and yours to a win - instead of insulting others, show some gratitude maybe? Its kinda offensive getting carried while playing like crap, and then say "i wish i had other teammates". Just for saying that, he should have lost. And he started it btw? THere is nothing wrong or offensive telling a BB who has full HP sitting in the back, to go forward and tank. And his response cleary indicated, that he has no idea how to play a T8 BB.

Sure, if you fancy being radared without being in cover, then its certainly the better option

Whether you can actually ruin a DD during a 10 sec radar would mostly depend on the radar range, and lets not forget, those US floaty arcs arent hard to dodge. Regardless however, their concealment is >10km, unlike Cleveland or Baltimore which can basicly stealthradar. So Dallas/Helena can be spotted. And during a 10 sec radar, their teammates have a 4 sec window to shoot, which is almost non existent, and they can shoot themselves 2 times at best. Most likely it would be 1 shot. And Budyonny or Shchors with Radar doesnt sound too bad either, considering that they rather wanna stay at range. Not sure if any T5 ship should have radar, since they can see T4 ships, on the other hand, their concealment sucks even more. But you would have a chance to radar him, if the DD wants to torp you. I think, it wouldnt be so bad actually, better ease them into radar, than smack them hard once they get to T8+. Not to mention, T8 radar is one of the worst with Cleveland, Balti and Chapa all having stealth radar capability.

When you carry the potatosack, and get reported (see funny and sad game situations-thread) also: RAMMING SPEED, because why not

Our Amagi started flaming my div mate, after he told him that he should tank (Amagi full HP, div NC almost dead). His response was, Amagi cant tank, has 32mm armor and is a BATTLECRUISER, which the game cant distinguish... Then he died to a NC and it started. Green is the Amagi, Red is enemy team (one guy actually) and yellow is div mate.

Thats only true for Ranked sprint (? i think its true for all ranks there) and lower ranks in normal ranked. In normal ranked, you dont get an extra star starting at R10.

But thats like forcing some players to be CV/Venezia snacks. Or you make people pick Moskva instead of Stalingrad (or Petro - who knows), which are pretty much same ships. TBH, i think you would force even more clans away with it, if you want to keep CVs in and enforce that rule. Btw i dont think that rule would be bad, id actually support that, but only if CVs get removed too.

Showing that RN CLs or PA DDs can equip radar might actually do more harm than good imo. If a new player sees, that Edinburgh could have radar, he might be scared off. In reality, atleast 9/10 RN CLs dont have radar (thats just me guessing). If they are rare, than it shouldnt actually be a big deal? WG should make a cyclopedia in game, where you can look up basic stuff, like Radar. That should solve the problem, since those people that want to learn can do it in game, and noone has an excuse anymore for not being able to learn (which already is kinda funny considered the age we live in, where you find everything within 1 sec with google)

Id say, WG thinks that a BB is equally good as a CV (probably when you only look at how much damage they deal). They know, that not every clan might have a good CV player, so they "thought", a clan without a good CV player can get away with playing BB On the other hand, being able to bring a BB and a CV wont change anything really. It doesnt make other Cruisers more viable, on the contrary, they would actually get less viable (if such thing would be possible). The closer you get, the worse it becomes. You add a BB in there, its gonna get EVEN worse if you try to get closer. A BB might shift it back towards Stalins tho, in case everyone would pick Kremlin which is more immune to Venezia than all other BBs. And Venezia is more vulnerable to BBs than Stalin, unless you get the Stalin broadside. Its only the CV, everything bad is the CV. You could focus on everything else, it wont get better. You could remove Stalingrad and Venezia, and people would have less fun, since they would just try to get the next viable pick after that (Moskva? Petro?)

Yes, that Benson player gets carried in every game, thats why he has an astounding 42% WR There is no such thing as getting carried for THOUSANDS of battles. You can get lucky for 10 specific games, BUT WE ALL GET THOSE. Same as we all get stupid teams which you cant carry. Once you get past 1000 battles, its pretty clear what your own skill is. And everyone who cant accept that, just lives in denial and refuse to see their own shortcomings.

Noone said, good player should win every game. There is a difference. Not to mention, good players win like 6-7 out of 10, while people who are basicly AFK still win 4~ out of 10... that already doesnt sound fair to me, because i have to invest so much more to win 3~ games more than someone who basicly doesnt do anything.