DFens_666

Nah, wont work. Ive always used PM + main armament mod 1 and before they reworked them engine mod in slot 2. You still lose everything on DDs all the time. My own thinking was sometimes, taking LS and not take PM... then again, nothing else makes much sense either, except PT, but if you are spotted you can assume someone is shooting you anyway Same for all the modules ofc, there is nothing else which is more useful regardless.

FTFY. Yes, ships can detonate without actually getting hit - did that with Orion against Kuma (i believe it was). I think i know why WG keeps holding on to that mechanic: Over the years, it became more and more clear to me, that WG doesnt like skill or skilled players. Everything needs to be casual or heavily influenced by RNG. A mechanic like detonations essentially removes skill. The worst player can "instakill" the best player by a RNG roll.

Note to WG: Change Cruisers and DDs, since they are pleb-boats anyway, to not be able to damage enemies, but instead heal their own BBs by shooting them. Since we all know, BBs are teh masterrace anyway

No need to encourage more 3x BBabies or 3x DDummies

Like they would understand that themselves The problem is, they are allowed to do it and get away with it, while noone else has the chance to do anything about even. Even the easiest way of not playing with them is forbidden...

You can follow your DDs in the beginning because you have that smoke which gets you out of those tricky situations. Look for broadside targets. Shooting BBs on the lowermidtiers is a bit annoying due to their armor, just shoot the superstucture or bow/stern. You can get good salvoes against Cruisers by aiming at the right spots, also against squishy BBs like RN/US. Reload is slow, thats true, but it gives you enough time to wiggle in and out between salvoes, unlike others which suffer DPM loss if you dont use all your guns. Zara is actually rather tanky with its 30mm upper belt. Properly angled you can pretty much bounce almost all BB shells coming your way.

That sounds really arbitrary and WG could just make up who is a real competetive player, and who is wanna-be competetive. In which category would they put me? Ive usually played less games than others in my clan, but that doesnt have anything to do with being less competetive, only that i didnt have that much time (old clan, not current one). Also we often only got into Typhoon barely, because lack of time/interest and what not. And i clearly dont see myself as a wanna-be competetive player, i have a very competetive mindset, but WG would judge by spreadshit and say "oh he is just playing casually CBs, he wants CVs in there HERPADERP" So typical subbo

Well i do have my own believes about how WG might influence the game, but in regards to spending money (or not), i havent seen any indications that there might be anything to that. Seen too many whale accounts with dozens of premiums but 40% WR.

Well, WG is making all this possible by catering to those crap-heads... they are allowed with their anti-playstyle, ruining the entire game. But WG likes those, as they spent bucketloads of - like that pommern id assume. In other games, you could avoid those players and noone would play them. IRL, they would get beaten up. In WoWs, they are king of the world

I cant quite understand how that would make any sense, except that there would be no playerskill, and everything is just predetermined by some teams being "strong" and others "weak". Or lets put it like this: - Will bad players, who spent a lot of money be paired with good players who dont spent money? Are there good players who dont spent money? Wouldnt that mean, good players would be punished by carrying bad players?

Doesnt matter what they were in reallife. It only matters how WG implements them into the game. Scharnhorst on T7 is a BB with smaller guns than Alaska on T9, while the latter is a BC taking a Cruiser spot. They might aswell put Scharnhorst on T9 as a Cruiser and only change the armor slightly... might not even do that, just compare Scharnhorst with Ägir. Alltho, Ägir can easily citadelled, while Scharnhorst cant. The same could be done with any BC currently in the game, alltho Hood would be a bit problematic with those larger caliber guns.

Well, T6 MM probably not the greatest (never was tho), but with PEF, you should focus on DDs and Cruisers. The Pen is more than enough to citadel Cruisers (thanks to the smaller caliber, its even easier to citadel some of those with thin armor), and when you help get rid of them, you can also get closer to BBs where the pen is enough.

PEF should be the most accurate german BB, yet most people still dont like it So you are right about that one.

We do have Odin nowadays with even small caliber. So they definetely could do it. Question is, how many gimmicks they would need to compensate for that... and then they might differ too much from the other RN BBs. Maybe they would be better on T6 and QE on T7.

Thats the point when you are supposed to by a T8 (T9) premium Sad part, im not even joking, i think thats WG wants us to do

Just revert the freaking citadel nerf for both KGV and DoY would be a start... then again, reverting a nerf is not something WG likes to do. Maybe remove the citadel alltogether?

But teh BBabies want to bash lowtier ships with their hardearned bought Derbizz

People had the same complaint about T8 MM... Then WG tried to fix that. Now we have shitty T6MM Supershitty T7 MM Slightly less shitty T8MM (which people still complain about btw) So they achieved nothing, only made T6-7 much worse. Oh yeah, T9 is the best tier now.

What kinda heresy is this? Playing your own game... pfff

Then we might aswell give it fuelsmoke, so it can surprise others from behind an island, smoke up and let the secondaries do their thing, while rushing them fullspeed

Doomed if you, doomed if you dont... great game balance. If the CV is doing a proper approach, you will get fucked either by him, or might aswell get devstriked by a BB which is just waiting for you to show broadside

As if this RNG shitshow could really work for e-sports.

https://forum.worldofwarships.asia/topic/35541-wargamings-response-to-farazelleths-cv-questions-opinons/?do=findComment&comment=416693 they kinda said it^^

Because WG thinks the playerbase is too stupid to handle that

Does angling work differently for Georgia? Doesn matter what ship anyone plays, angling works the same for every ship. Only difference is large caliber AP which ignores the angle by overmatch... Also Alaska has better penetration angles, so 30° is not enough for it.