DFens_666

I guess every Cruiser that can remotely citadel a BB generates pure hate from BBabies. Otherwise i cant explain it myself. Imagine shooting a broadside Moskva with a Stalingrad 4 times, to get 1 citadel each time because "2,65 sigma is OP" in reality its like "1 shell falls short, 1 in cit, 1 in upper belt, 2 in superstructure and 1 goes over" A Henri would have killed that Moskva several times faster. Must be the same with Thunderer. Maybe they are incapable of understanding, that this thing sets them on fires all the time, while they think its that Cruiser somewhere at an island I wouldnt be surprised at all... Sikrit footage of a BBaby getting citadelled by a Cruiser

Imagine getting a 58% Thunderer player for "balance", and he drives up and down the H-line in spawn, losing the game with full health Last place in XP ofc. Totaly not a recipe for a roflstomp.

Smolensk doesnt pen 32mm. MvR? Its Haku 2.0 Meanwhile the ranked queue be like: 50 BB, 1-2 DD/CV/Cruiser

Yep, very much this. One game (the other Bourgogne) it looked quite promising. We had a Yamato down to like 10k or so, CV attacked him, and with all other ships sitting behind islands, i kept shooting HE too since he was angled. I thought we would kill him. Yamato goes dark, CV attacks a different target. Later, Yamato returns with 50k... Him attacking the Yamato first was already bad, but it could have been managed if we would have killed it. And then he managed to make it worse, by attacking some ship with full HP, while 2 DDs already cornered us on each side in our spawn And my 2 DDs were ofc dead. Luckily i didnt have that many CV games, and for me, most of the games were decided by DD players. Like 1 game with 4 DDs per side, my DDs just all died. And in many games, my DDs got devstruck in smoke by torps. If you are 4 ships down, and 0 or 1 DD vs 3-4 DDs its basicly game over. Playing a DD myself wouldnt seem to be much help, because especially BBs refuse to shoot DDs at all, and most games only have 2 Cruisers. Probably why DM worked reasonably well, since it can kill DDs on his own, atleast in the lower ranks. To some degree i can understand why most 50-55% players complain about ranked. I dont see how they can influence matches. I could say, maybe 2 wins i contributed enough to make a difference. While i fucked up in one loss, it hardly would have mattered since we only killed one ship... yeah, i doubt i could have changed that with a DM

I started at 18 because i didnt play at all last season. With 16 games i was at R10. Now i have 29 games and am R11 with 1 Star I was hoping, teams would get better at the mid-league... how wrong i was. Its like suicide parade.

Man, the day today was so horrible, and i dont know what these people play for, but its certainly not to save their star. Frequently one team is down 3-4 ships after a couple of minutes without any chance to fight back. Played 13 battles today, and id say all but 2 were complete roflstomps. It was pretty much irrelevant what i did, except maybe 1 DM and 1 Yamato game, where with the first i killed all 3 DDs and with Yamato helped kill 2 DDs. Even fighting DDs with Radar mino didnt work, because my team refused to shoot em, and i can pretty much get 80% of a DD with radar mino, you often wont get the entire DD. Even more so if they have a heal like Daring and Halland. The worst one was a Bourgogne game, where the enemies had like 4 Unicums in the enemy team, that was just hardcore raping WGP2W, VIS, some random dude with 60% and AWSL, none of the enemies died

And some point, i pretty much ignored it, because it doesnt matter. Either i win or lose, and today was heavy losing time Half team dead within 5 mins? Not uncommon i must say.

I also like, how he wants an open discussion, and when i ask him a normal question - nothing happens

After a full day of ranked...

The BB version of smolensk. Not really OP, yet totaly annoying. Balance the HE then its a fine ship.

Ohboy... first things first: - AFK shima for 2 mins - Rushes cap where no teammate is - dies ofc because CVs and everything - Starts flaming

Those ships can often be ignored and be made useless with proper positioning. If you focus on them dealing 0 damage, ofc you will eventually lose. Focus on his teammates instead, who are closer to you and not dodging. if they all camp in the back, only work on getting the objective and let them come back, or just get the win because they prefer to camp. Better than to play their game and reward them for their camping.

No, because this 100% favours BBs, since they can pen everything with their HE, while Cruiser struggle against certain BBs to begin with. Not only do they deal 0 damage when it shatters, you would also remove their only way of damaging the ship at certain areas, more since since saturation exists. And DDs are even worse off, since they cant even pen Cruisers properly. BB HE needs to be fixed, especially RN BB HE. One Cruiser farming you with HE should never be a problem. But a Thunderer shooting HE from 20km, starting basicly a fire every salvo is what causes issues. Imagine if a Cruiser would easily start several fires every 23 secs.

The moment you realize, its always 40% having good "RNG" luck

The explanation is: Inconsistency You cant look at one specific game, where you did well and still lost. This might have just been a game, which noone could have carried. At the same time, if you did poorly in another game, it might aswell have been a win if you would have played better.

Because a match being predetermined is only in your own head since you are using MMM. One ranked game i should have lost according to you, but it wasnt. Another game i should have easily won, but it wasnt easy at all, infact it could have been lost very easily, despite 2x 65% players on my team. One very common claim back in the RTS CV days was, that the worse CV player always loses, and i remember one game, where he had a 30% Saipan against a 60% Hiryu, yet we still won. Lets take this example Why do you complain about this? You only posted it and said "BALANS episode 3" Whats wrong with that? And i dont want to hear "if you cant see it, you are *insert random insult*.

Personaly id take Mainz or Bayard, leaning towards Bayard because its more unique (MBRB and engine boost). I agree with @Salentine tho, its probably the hardest of them all to do well in.

1. Your gameplay shows, you dont know how to play for a win 2. Good to know, i wont bother to help you improve your gameplay anymore Yet that Yamato got 4 kills and carried his team to victory. While you apparently... didnt do much at all. How come he was so much better than you, even if he supposedly is a worse player?

This is how you get rid of ships properly. Dont waste time, prioritze which needs to go first (like the Thunderer which was rushing my teammate for a ram, which i couldnt prevent sadly). And i was i an position, which was extremely strong for the Bourgogne: At the flank, going into their broadsides. They cant angle against me and my team at the same time.

Ok, this is definetely you. - 1. salvo of torps was just wasted. You then wait for them to reload to torp the kremlin. Meanwhile, your Gearing is engaging the Halland and you keep torping the Kremlin RPF even points to your right side, so there is a DD within <9km because its closer than the Kremlin - You dont do anything while you watch your torps hit the Kremlin, for whatever reason? Torping a low HP target is often questionable to begin with. - After the Kremlin, you start torping the Ohio. You are focusing on the worst targets: BBs. You want to get rid of DDs because those win games. - Why do you keep going to the Ohio/Salem? There are 3 DDs moving over from the other flank, waiting to gang up on your team. Yet you keep throwing torps towards >10km targets, once even when the Salem has 4k HP left. Thats just bad play. - RPF points to the opposite side, DD <9km from you, yet you totaly ignore it. The value from RPF for you is = 0. Despite RPF saying: there is a Ship coming closer from the other side, you throw torps at the Ohio. - The end is just painful to watch. No reaction to the DDs next to you. More torps towards Ohio despite being spotted and 3 DDs are within 5kms of you. - You are even getting into the cap to cap it, only to get surprised by the Gearing. You had several ships backup against the DDs, yet you didnt help your team at all. You wanted to take no risk, thus taking a pretty much guaranteed loss. A few potential torphits and spotting + backup from your team to kill the DDs = you probably could have won it. 30k Ohio and 14k Salem are no targets which anyone has to fear.

Except it doesnt really do much in reality. You cant wait for your secondaries to kill a ship, because by that time, a couple of your teammates decided its time to die. Ohio should be much better than GK, simply because the mainguns perform better. And whether you like it or not: MM wont change, so the best chance to win more often is, to improve your own gameplay. Pick a meta ship, in which you are good at. Dont focus on damage farming and take out important targets, first DDs and Cruisers.

Any specific reason why you play GK most of the time? I consider GK to be a rather poor pick due to the guns. >430mm caliber BBs are definetely better, as they can punish Cruisers regardless of angle, except the russian connection Having looked at your ship picks, id consider most of them rather poor picks without much carry potential. GK not good Smolensk bad Wooster good Venezia ok DM good Kremlin good Goliath bad Haru very bad Daring good Moskva ok Halland meh Gearing meh (maybe if legendary) Marceau bad Ohio good Thunderer depends on playstyle You need to work on taking more ships out of the game 0,75 is not good. Damage aint that great either across the board. Ok i probably doesnt warrant <40% WR, but with the right ship picks i doubt those were all default losses.

Looks pretty questionable if your settings show ranked stats and ranked stats in that specific ship, which leaves you with average battle numbers of <20, and thus they dont mean anything. I was <50% at some point aswell with like 8 games played, doesnt mean its an accurate picture of how i play. MMM is a horrible tool, and you should get rid of it. One Bourgogne game today i had to do the outmost to get a win out of it, and i checked the WR after the game, our team should have been much better, yet they werent. Another game we had a much weaker team, and we still won, even tho it was very close. You can never know, and MMM doesnt help in that regard.

What initial spotting + AP rockets from MvR do MvR takes half Mino + BBs take half Petro. And over the course of the match to me And this is a 45% potato Its so retarded its not funny anymore...

Yes please, so much this. It will automatically fix Fires, because the couple of Cruisers in a game wont oversaturate the DCP from BBs. But if you add 2-3 BBs who also shoot nothing but HE, causing atleast one fire every time, you end up with a horrible fire-meta. They might give them a weaker form of SAP to compensate, or let them have HE with 0% firechance. Either way it will be situational agains DDs, some tanky Cruisers and bow-on BBs, but not the retarded no-brain crap we have now, where its better than to look at a target where your AP does something. BBs dont need fires, if they can deal >10k HE salvos on other ships. Its like having a cake, and eating a bucket of icecream on the side.