DFens_666

I guess those midtier Cruisers had it way too easy... imagine getting SAP citadelled by 14000 max damage SAP """" SHORT """" Not to mention <12km detectability for T6-8 I need some of that crap you guys are smoking over there.

So same as Stalingrad?

Just remembered i could put this in here

Its not about the risk-taking. Its because i dont get, why you would complain that Hydro/radar are too strong of a counter, when you repeatedly say, that these ships can be rushed and torped point blank range? That means to me, that the counter isnt really that strong...

I think the same... so no more playing before the evening when all BB-kevins are home from school to grace us with their leet-tactics

Eventually, yes. But not yet, its still too new. Most people in Petro are good or atleast above average right now. In a few months, WR will drop to the usual <52% as all others too.

Now imagine, that the majority of Petro and Stalin players are above average or unicum, which results in them having higher average WR. It would be like looking at the better half of the players in other ships, and demand nerfs based on that.

Imagine everyone should pick Bourgogne as BBs because its so strong in randoms...

I pretty much hate playing Stalingrad in Randoms... its a "shoot me now" sign for most players because they get triggered by seeing the ship on the enemy side. Thats why i played it a bit in ranked, as its more fun to play. Sadly, my teams didnt give me much reason to actually have fun btw, good to see you again, took a break didnt you?

If you see a 43% player aiming almost decklevel (atleast upper half, clearly not waterline) on a broadside CV at 10km, getting a 3x cit devstrike, you wonder which players are blessed by RNG. And no, i didnt make this up, i saw it on twitch.

Talking about "others are implying what im saying". You only ignore what we say, taking bits of it which you can argue against. One of the first replies i wrote: - Ambushing/rushing a ship without hydro and/or radar can be a valid tactic - Doing the same to a ship which has hydro is... a misplay Why is that so hard to accept, that you shouldnt try to ambush a hydro equiped Cruiser with a DD carrying 4km torps? The equivalent would be, to demand Cruisers get armor to autobounce all BB shells, because i want to be able to kill them. If you try to ambush a hydro ship, its a risk you are taking, which has a high chance to fail. Expecting to be able to do it to every ship regardless of its role is naive, because it cant be exclusive to one class of ships.

Dunno, this forum killed my sense for sarcasm

I think the issue with Kremlin is, that its mostly bad/average players overperforming, and not so much good players. I personaly dont like Kremlin too much, despite being supposedly accurate at mid-shortrange, it still manages to go all over the place and give overpens. Kremlin is an easy to play ship, just lay anchor bow on and shoot other ships without getting punished by HE and fires too hard.

"Stalingrad" and "maneuvrable" in one sentence And they will fail once they get it Lets not forget the >50 BBs that often clog up the random queue these days, but "BBs UP"

Looking at their perfomance in randoms: Yes Alltho with YY they went a bit too far. Henri was a smart nerf in my book, as the long range accel-reverse-dodging was cancerous. Can add Venezia, which also deserved a nerf for its random performance. It was outperforming most BBs...

The thing is, you cant really say, CVs dont save stars. I could also say, i havent seen a Smolensk save his star either. If there would be 2-4 CVs per team, a CV would also save his star more often. that was one year ago btw So CVs should earn more XP for same performance? see next quote

Just have his team fail for him If you cant kill him, kill his team first.

Just like you kill BBs: Focus fire Also Thunderer should easily win an HE slugfest against Stalingrad. Thunderers good rudder shift should prevent getting AP penned too hard. And you even outspot it.

You should be careful statshaming others, when you have less damage with your Cleveland than with your Danae. Thats lowtier DD tactic. And because they dont work once you go midtiers, you complain that "it should work" because you dont want to adapt to hydro and radar. Again, not effective once you meet ships which are unable to dodge because they move <20kts. Its not an achievement, punishing newbies at lowtiers because they dont understand whats happening.

But basicly all TX CAs can bounce Conqueror AP when properly angled? 30mm midsection Hindi, Zao, Henri, DM....

Only going from "stealthradar" to "basicly still stealth radar but ~100m buffer"

Im just disagreeing with WG calling it a global change, when it only hit 2 premium ships. No Cruisers got their armor nerfed, if they had thicker armor prior to the change (IJN midtiers f.e.). Only Smolensk and Colbert got their armor nerfed. Mind you, im not argueing against the nerf, atleast for Smolensk it was deserved. Alltho id have prefered raising the citadel instead to make it more accessable. I think people often assume overpens are citadel overpens, while they were actually not hitting the citadel at all. If they would have nerfed Smolensk on its own, i wouldnt have complained either.

ofc, maybe that was a bit misleading. Impero should get the 9 guns Roma has, while they showed the 4x4 TX BB in the video. And id just guess it gets the same damage because same guns?

If i can make exceptions to the rule, then i can say everything is a global change F.e. "all T9 BBs will get [insert change here] except [insert all BBs except the one you want to nerf]" Thats pretty much the issue i have. If they would have buffed RN CLs to 25mm atleast, then i could say, yes ok, its consistent now. But since they didnt... And i believe they only said its a global change to be on the safe side.

Italian battleship Impero, Tier VIII: Maximum SAP shell damage - 14,050. SAP Id assume the 381mm guns all get the same maxdamage... yeah imagine 16 of those against anything