Jump to content


  • Content Сount

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

  • Clan


About Lupin_sansei

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

784 profile views
  1. Lupin_sansei

    Changes to Test Ships — Closed Testing (DB 288)

    I can not find any words, to describe those nerfs. Sorry wg, but stop balancing the whole italian navy around a single gimmick from the legendary capt. sansonetti. I want to play this nation likewise the other nations.
  2. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.10.11, New ships (DB 243)

    As i understand you compare only the hull and main armamant. In this way a lot of ships would be copy paste, even if they are not. Did you compare the real stats on navypedia about those ships? Feel free to look at it. https://www.navypedia.org/ships/uk/brit_cr_london.htm And https://www.navypedia.org/ships/spain/sp_cr_canarias.htm
  3. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.10.11, New ships (DB 243)

    The Canarias-class is based on the County-class but it is a class of its own. The development and construction wad made in Ferrol Spain. When you compare those classes you will see major differences. Superstructure, torpedo, AA and secondary armament are totally not the same. The mainguns could elevate to a higher angle than the british ones. So we can agree, that this is absolute not a copy pasta ship. The gimmick is something i am not happy about it. This firemode should not be on regular ships. So wg please find a way to balance it or reconsider the use of it.
  4. Lupin_sansei

    German light cruiser line split proposal

    I like your suggeation. I found a design from a modelkit site some time ago. Maybe it finds a place in here. Schichau-Entwurf 1938 "Berlin-Klasse" I don't know if it's a legit ship design. Maybe someone knows something about it. But as you can see, it is armed with 5x3 150mm guns in a unique gun layout. Looks like an enlarged Nürnberg with one more turret fore and aft. About AA and other armament i unfortunately have not found any more data. With good AA it could fit as a T9 maybe T10 ship. Please let me know if this is something you can work with.
  5. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.10.9, new ships (DB 199)

    It is a copy pasta too... This is just the Giulio Cesare given to the soviets, renamed it and maybe they give it a bit more AA
  6. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.10.9, new ships (DB 199)

    @YabbaCoe Thx for the intel about Novorossiysk aka Giulio Cesare ;)
  7. Lupin_sansei

    Spanish Ships line

    Very good work. Well done
  8. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.9.10, Italian Battleships (DB 81)

    Thank you for the link. It's a huge document. As @Aetius85 just stated Lepanto was used in the ironclad launched in 1883. "New" capitalships in 1930/40 would have got other names. Furthermore the name Lepanto is used on two spanish DDs (1928 and 1957) too. In expectation to see someday spanish ships in wows, i would rather give the name to one of this two ships. Or else we have multiple ships with totally identical names. And that will be confusing. Similar names can work (like Lion/Lyon), but not identical ones. I hope wg will pick the new shipnames from this book.
  9. Lupin_sansei

    ST 0.9.10, Italian Battleships (DB 81)

    @Tanatoy I am happy to see finally the italian BBs. But have mixed feelings about the paper ships. So please start the line at T3 like all other lines, correct the V. Veneto modell as it really was. It is not a identical Roma copy. The names for the T9 and T10 don't fit as for this time. Please WG reconsider a change to the names. V. Veneto was named after the location of the battle in WW1 italy won against the austro-hungarian. So you can use other locations of WW1 battles italy won. Like Piave or Monte Grappa. Thanks
  10. Lupin_sansei

    Submarines Test Iteration #3 - Feedback

    Still waiting for the test login :(
  11. Lupin_sansei

    Italian Battleships. The top of the line

    It took me some time, sorry for letting you wait. But here we go.... First things first. I can understand your thoughts about not adding the 65mm/64 to the Imperatore Augusto. It will be too overfilled with all that guns on it. I got an idea how the BB can have the 65mm/64 on it by removing the 90mm/53 and replacing them with additional 135mm/45 on the main deck and the 65mm/64 on the upper deck. To show you this idea i request your permissoin to modify your design. If you like this idea, maybe you can use it on a second T10 BB Design. About the techtree i had initially set up the common known battleships and designs. T3 Cuniberti / T4 Conte di Cavour (1915) / T5 Caio Duilio (1940) / T6 Francesco Caracciolo / T7 OTO Battlecruiser Design 1930 / T8 Littorio / T9 U.P. 41 / T10 Concetto CRDA As mentioned the low tiers will have a greater firepower compared to the counterparts and be maybe to strong. Climbing up to the mid tier the 381mm main gun will be introduced at T6. The line ends with the sole design i had found at that time. Knowing that this setup is hard to ballance and knowing wg i made a worst case scenario techtree. T3 Cuniberti / T4 Dante Alighieri / T5 Andrea Doria (1916) / T6 Caio Duilio (1940) / T7 Francesco Caracciolo / T8 Littorio / T9 U.P. 41 / T10 Concetto CRDA The low tier ships will be okish but the mid tier will be somekind weak at this point. Top tier remains the same. In between this margin i have many ideas and found some intersting designs (as well as your cassone design) to use in the tech tree or add as a premium. I will make a little sheet with all ships and designs i consider worth to be discussed and add that later in here. I am looking forward to see what you think about it.
  12. Lupin_sansei

    Italian Battleships. The top of the line

    Wow, this is a great post. First of all, compliments to you. I am very happy to see a well designed Cassone project for ww2 times. I hope to see this one in the game (soon). Maybe you can add some 65mm/64 M1939 on it. I am curious about how you would suggest the whole techtree line. I thought a lot about how a italian BB tree will look alike. I had never a idea how to fit the cassone in the line. Again great work, i like it a lot. I made some ideas for a BB tree and also thaught about a (wg) worstcase scenatio. I think (at the moment) all low and mid tier ships will be either too op (in some way) or suffer for beeing put a tier higher. Maybe we can share some ideas or even discuss a possible BB line. Anyway, i am looking forward to your next design.
  13. Lupin_sansei

    Spanish Ships line

    I can"t understand why so many peolpe are saying (or even yelling) "put this to pan EU". Seriously WTF! The spanish armada is worth a full tech tree in WOWS. The variety of ships offers some interesting playstyles. There are currently some tech trees in the game with more paperships than this suggestion has. The fact that the RU BBs has only one ship build and a ton of paperships including the premiums opens the path for even implementig a BB line for spain. This is more than enough proof for introducing spain as a nation in WOWS and giving them the tech trees.
  14. Lupin_sansei

    ST - Submarines

    I like the idea to have the subs in an separate game mode. WG please take your time for balance the submarines well before adding them to a testserver. Don't rush. And please listen to feedback.
  15. Lupin_sansei

    Fan made Italian tech tree

    @SparvieroVV Hi, Great Techtree with lots of work. Compliments As i read your idea of Dolo i have to share my idea for a T10 Light Cruiser with you (and of course the community). Maybe it's the same idea and ship... My T10 CL will be based on the Ansaldo UP.770 Pocket Battleship with a gunlayout 4x3 + 2x2 (16 guns) or 2x3 + 4x2 (14 guns) all 152mm. This idea is based on the fact, that the ansaldo project UP.90 Pocket Battleship had to be changed to a Light Cruiser with 3x3 152mm guns. But they never built it in the end. So i took the biggest Ansaldo project for a Pocket Battleship and give it 152mm guns. This is a Illustration of the original project. What do you think about it?