-
Content Сount
11,301 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
39586 -
Clan
[PEZ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Yedwy
-
No this fight I was top tier, when bottom or mid tier I usually max out around 100k with T8 BBs but its 2 small a sample anyhow
-
No but I m with this game for like 4 something years so I saw things come and go and i recon I have a pretty good grasp on their ways in the meanehile
-
For instance it would be very interesting to see Gneise like design with 6x460+ guns (i dont know what caliber Germany actually had in works as naval option here) and see how effective it would be as T9 or 10, since there is more and more BBs with icebreakers there it shouldnt be imposssible to balance within some normal range
-
I meant as in comparison to T7 situation, I know no T8 overmatches any T8 BB (until Champaigne comes that is)
-
No they are not, subs are coming somewhere between WOWS anniversary and Christmas
-
Difference is Tirpitz is evolution of Gneisenau bot gun wise and playwise, while Odin is evolution of Sharnhorst (well not really as it was supposedly one of basic designs but lets say it was) and Shan vs Gneise or Odin vs Tirpitz have different roles, what ruins Tirpitz in this role (brawler) is fact he doesnt overmatch his tier however the MM rarely puts any ship other then T9/10 as top tier these days...
-
No way hat will be Balao or something like that
-
As per parts: Which has no relevance to game really, if the guns existed or not means zilch Gneise, Sinop, Sharnhorst, KGV, DOY have 3 turrets, Lyon, Nagato and Colorado have 4 turrets, some have 2 guns per turret some have 4 guns per turret and in different caliber, caliber is relevan in the game for overmatch and other characteristics of the guns but not so much as you might think, also different sheels are sometimes on different tiers fired from (more or less) same gun making them vastly different (yes that was like that IRL as well) so Konig guns un T8 are not really Konig guns same as for instance Slava guns are not Sinop guns... Colorado has 8 guns, Nagato has 8 guns, KGV and DOY have 10 guns, LYon has 16 guns, Sharnhorst and Sinop have 9 guns, Gneise is a clear loser here with 6 guns, Gneise is near bottom in effectivnes of main battery actually due to low number of barrels, thats the whole reason why she has secondaries and torps same as Sharnhorst that has low main gun effectivnes because of small caliber and not low barrel number... IMHO Sharnhost is bette then Gneise for long and mid ranges because of the way ballistics work in WOWS even though the guns are smaller, close by Gneise is better though... As I have told before which tier ship is sitting on is not so relevant, the gun power progression is not linar or tier connected, for instance RN BB line has 15" on QE then 14" on KGV and again 15" on Monarch, naother example Musashi at T6 is basically Nagato but she fires different shell and those are "same" IJN 16" guns as on Izumo, except they are totaly not... You can compare any BB to any BB really however Odin is a T8 Sharnhorst and not Gneisenau so no need to compare them at all its the exactly same concept of decent number of barrels but lower caliber with higher ROF and compensated by secondaries and torps... Btw as effectivnes goes this was my second battle with her and battle average... (yes I know I am a sucker)
-
And its relevant to my post how exactly? You are free to spend your FreeXP however you like m8, btw you do realise a difference between GRINDING a line and RE-GRINDING a line right, you know I had all T10 unlocked + a number of reward T10s...
-
But only for a month AFAIK? Next month its RP IIRC?
-
Ignis Purgatio is a bit of a dissapointment... What is even original about the Warhammer theme?
Yedwy replied to WarDax's topic in General Discussion
This collab is in essence a homage to W40k and skin is what can in fact be done, WG will have hardly had time to make a completely new ship from scratch, balance it and then put it in game, a "morphogenic" camo is what is a standard for collabs and only sensible thing actually... My only beef is that both ships are Amagis, would be nicer if they took two different ones say Amagi and Bismarck or Richelieu, they could have put a bit more effort in making them more unique to the original ships say making sec Amagi or accurate Bis or something but then again that would involve more balancing (although not as much as a completely new ship) but one way or the other it was pretty transparent and it was clear what those ships are... Adding a new nation for collab is not a good idea, we had that in the past with ARP and it didnt end well, in the end all those ships ended up in IJN tree with normal ones... I for one got the Ragnarok in 4th box and I am pretty happy with it, its a bit more visually interesting and its ok to play for 5€ or so not 2 bad -
Good thing I dont really give a FF for either of those two... I will slowly regrind my way to T10 through different lines (in fact even entire trees) I reset and collect the RP so in the end I should end up with Siegfried and some 100k "change" within a year or so, assuming Slava is balanced for 3-4 moths and then added after 2-3 months I should be right about the 60-70k mark at that time...
-
Well we have one right now actually but somehow, maybe, they did add two 2mil FreeXP DDs one after the other
-
Seriously doubt they will put another steel BB in there so soon after Shikishima...
-
I know what Slava was meant to be - I was here back then... ^^ However that seemed to be water under the bridge for a while now, I think its pretty clear we wont see that happening... As for Zarya I dot know much about her apart from what you can see from the full tree view in game so i have no idea what their intentions are
-
I seriously doubt Slava will be tech-tree... Taking into account that recently we had one T10 BB added for steel, Thunderer is still not that long in game for coal at T10, that we have a Coal T9 in works to replace JB (Pommern ex Ludendorf) I would take a guess... Zarya Svobody (should she be added as such and not as an event ship) might be FreeXP as we didnt have a BB for FreeXP since Musashi... Slava will either join Ohio for RP or even replace her
-
No actually there is no room to maneuver that is precisely the point, you are not allowed to use stats or by extension their derivative in any discussion where they might actually be relevant... for instance random guy claims - DDs are OP, easiest class to play and need nerfing, now you take a look at the stats and see he is a BB main and has no idea about actually playing DDs, never had played them and probably never will, now if you say - you have no idea what you are talking about because you dont play DDs - its invalid and against the rules, you know you used a derivative of his stats as an argument in a negative manner ergo its no, no... I dont say anyone stats should be sole or even prime thing to consider, not at all but experience and results in any endeavour DO matter whern you are gauging an opinion someone gave about a topic, claiming its ok to restrict any and all discussion to solely a matter of rhetoric is well...
-
So basically everything is stat shaming and if we want to see where some guys opinion is coming from and find what we expected we are not allowed to comment on that because its against the rules... Gotcha
-
WTF are you talking about? If I come in and say "Muh I averaged 100k in Yahagi over 100 matches and it needs to be nerfed" and you show i did 20k average and am talking BS how is that not a valid argument against my claim? Another example - if I say subs are BS as they are because you can juke damage at around 6m and faceplug basically any DD coming your way while being immune to counter attack because of broken mechanics just by pressing a key twice and some guy that registered for game month ago "to play subs" claims they are under-powered and need buffs because he can only average 10k per match, whose opinion is more likely to be correct? Or do you think we need some scientific facts about it in randoms? You know the kind of facts that got us all the "perfectly balanced" stuff such as Smolensk, Belfast and similar?
-
Yeah we should all abide by the statements of guys that have less then 1k battles and are in deep red, its the best course of action for the game...
-
9.6 brings permaflages for all tier X german ships (for tokens)
Yedwy replied to GulvkluderGuld's topic in General Discussion
Well some might say feeling that you should get a T6 premium FOR FREE and a T8 premium for 3500 gold without having to put ANY EFFORT WHATSOEVER in the said is kind of hyper-entitelment... its simple really - one can pay for it or play for it -
Well I am not, but also a guy saying "respect my authorety" should in fact have some results to his name to back them up
-
What do you mean with "random given setup" there is no such thing or ever will be, even in privately run tournaments you know what ship class/tier will be played... Even less clear is the part with even "if you dont have the ship" you mean like rentals or what? I mean if you would choose a ship randomly the MM would decide at least 50% of matches by putting up selections that cant win against each other no matter what...
- 633 replies
-
- clan battles
- cvs
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
So a Haku, Yamato with LU, 4 Venezias/Smolensks/Stalins wit a Halland/Marceau is a good thing eh?
- 633 replies
-
- clan battles
- cvs
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
This is nonsensical... Let me ask this - if you went to see a doctor for an issue would you think a med students opinion is worth same, more or less then opinion of a specialist with say 10 years experience? If you would not find them equal then I guess its logical that in any other aspect of life its the same
