Yedwy

True, I doubt it will be such an issue though we havw what 2 weeks till next patch, thats considered a reasonable time frame by most people and most legislation, ofc WG should offer full refund for those that insist opon it

IDK abut pros but I as potato usually (mileage may vary a bit occasionnaly) send my most expendable plane type first (one I use least on that cv or it regens fastest) shorten squad spot one side, dump on something then f-key and repeat on the other flank, after that i plan next attack runs based on what I saw...

Pretty sure that shop image is a factory render meaning that IS the camo in question applied to ships model they use, there is likely a fo*kup in some res file or a wrong version of camo got packed into it, shouldnt be hard for devs to find and correct it but it prob wont warrant an emergency patch...

Nothing strange if he played to win and took chances up close and personal driving Lenin...

Now that is just silly, WG has access to their code, they could provide the neccessary technical info same as any other software company, they prob just decided it doesnt pay off to bother with it, weather because of risk to overall sales or market simplay being to small to be worth the bother...

Holy sh** I think I just pi**ed myself from laughing...

Looks like a mistake/bug, I am sure next patch it will be fixed

I saw a DD "warp" today first moment I thought it was lag but everything on network side looked normal, IDK

Because thats how MMO games work

And the funniest thing is that when one actually realises this is BS and you dont really need any of it you are at the point of actually not needing anything but wanting it anyways... Yea, they used the rework to scrub the ops, I mean from the logical standpoint that CV business is BS, ok I could understand an op largely revolving around the planes as Dynamo was needed actual sorting in that regard but in Hermes, Frontier and Blossom the CV part could have been done by adding few BBs same as they did for other ops... I mean its clear they do not want people T7+ in ops, preferably no people in any ops at all

They are

IMHO some continuous AA in relation to some planes/plane groups is laughable, some is not so laughable, esp not for DB that need to spend some time in it to drop one way or the other, yes you can mitigate the impact to a degree using slingshots, islands, squad shortening etc but it only goes so far and not all CVs/nations are equally suitable for it, summarily dismissing AA effects is well...

Mhm so say your boss never yelled at you?

And others need to grow some manly parts and some skin while they are at it, IDK in which bubble they are living their lives but it sure as hell aint the real world...

There are currently no ops that can prepare a player for any aspect of PvP they are their own world and that is par of the reason they are on their deathbed, another part is ofc Wg desire to push people to PvP as people spend most money on high tier stuff, incidentally WG never actually gave away a high tier ship for free (we are not counting the PR BS here) outside the (very very) unlikely SC drop, in the meanwhile they are pretty liberally dishing out T7 and below ships... I would welcome the option to be able to choose basically ANY ship tier for ANY op in most cases, op is played the same way only your prize level slides depending how stronk your ship is... Another thing is - make all ops available all the time even outside the divisions, one can be chosen for the weekly/monthly op and give double the points or something but the current system is just irritating... Make more new ops with historic and somewhat realistic goals such as sinking convoy (can be used for subs when they arrive as well), defending the convoy etc... Make PvP ops as well for instance - sub and dd force trying to sink the convoy of unarmed transports and capital ships with inactive weapons while a dd/cl force tries to stop them, could be make a helluva Axis vs Allies thing this... Remakes of great historic battles such as Channel dash, Narvik landings, parts of Jutland both in PvE and PvP form, maybe even PvPvE form where two or three teams compete for most points... Many options there, WG ignoring all of them despite having a nice potential of attracting new players

500k profit per battle with Zulu flag aint bad either...

Good for PA DDs, you prob wont build many of them for gunships nowadays so the enhanced DE next to SE is actually decent combo IMHO, helps you to start that permafire after the target just DCP-ed the flood...

An angry Tallin it would seem ^^

Come now comrade the Tzar is the perk of the special Balansakov unique captain set of by receiving a shell hit against the main hull

Emerald (after the buffs) plays exactly the same as Leander IMHO

Weekend glue eaters are at large

There is a world of difference between overextending and camping, trick is to find your and your ships place in it...

Then you are overextending a bit, its ok to be more careful about positioning in your BB and making sure you are not focused by the entire flank simultaneously, tanking damage for team comes secondary to dishing out damage for yourself after all and you cant do that if you are sunk 5 min in...

Its true, however steel as such is losing momentum as well I think, less and less really good/interesting ships make it through the testing and end up for steel, I am about to blow a crapton of steel on Thunderor of all things...