-
Content Сount
2,588 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6830 -
Clan
[-URK-]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by wot_2016_gunner
-
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
This game was strange, it ended before i could even realise it; we won, but i was like:"What just happened?" Btw, i got a clean dev. strike on a Surrey, Full HP to 0, tho it was stock, as it only had 30.700 HP (i think he forgot to upgrade it) Replay is included (20200208_193514_PASB729-Georgia_40_Okinawa.wowsreplay) -
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
It was a loss due to weekend teams, it happenes; tho i'll take 91k dmg in my Nurnberg, with 171 hits (which means that if I had Lütjens, i whould have activated his perk, but i don't have it). Plus, 700.700 potential dmg, lol, if i wanted to do that i would have never done it. Replay is included (20200208_161155_PGSC106-Nurnberg_41_Conquest.wowsreplay) -
What Players wishes from the World of the Warships
wot_2016_gunner replied to anonym_WHY4JO92xZKJ's topic in General Discussion
@dunbine Agree with everything. I porbably care about this game more than the majority of the players do, because i don't play this game just to play a game (if it as for this reason i maybe wouldn't even be here), i play this game because i love ships, and i want to play with them. I don't know if you watched the last stream, but Crysantos said that WG wants to keep the "national flaours", which i think it's the core problem of balancing. Plus, have you heard that for WG, Smolensk is fine? Bigget lie i've heard so far. i honestly feel like WG is sing me sometimes, when we keep saying to WG that we don't want a ceratin thing or that a certain ship is broken, but they ignore us and they say that it's fine. -
ST - Changes to test ships and Devonshire
wot_2016_gunner replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
I've an idea for Odin: 57.800 HP (about half the nerf) and we close the deal, what do you think? -
Return of the Fleet of Fog: Last Chance!
wot_2016_gunner replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
I just got the ARP Kongo guys. Today was a bit frustrating (potato teams) but it was worth it I don't think i'll be able to get Haurna tho, but i'm happy with Kongo and Hiei. -
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
Kongō-gata jun'yōsenkan, Kongo, joining the fleet... of fog After one of the most frustrating days ever, due to potato teams and damage farmers in Co-Op, that basically deleted stuff before you could ever aim at them, i finally got the ARP Kongo. I don't think i'll be albe to get Haruna, but i'm happy with two of them. -
Just wanted you guys to know that from today Update 0.9.1 is available for early downlaod with the WG Center. I don't know the exact size, but it's more than 1.5 GB.
-
ST - Changes to test ships and Devonshire
wot_2016_gunner replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
Sure, i was just comparing the HP with the ships that are closer to it. -
ST - Changes to test ships and Devonshire
wot_2016_gunner replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
-
ST - Changes to test ships and Devonshire
wot_2016_gunner replied to Tanatoy's topic in Development Blog
I agree with this part; i mean, i had really high hopes for it, she was really promissing, as Flamu also said; but right now, i just don't want it any more. Less HP than almost all the Tier 6 BBs? Seriously? Dunkerque as almost the same ammount of HP, but she's Tier 6 !!!!!!. The tier 7 BB that comes closer is the Lyon at 53k, but again, she's Tier 7; and btw, the Tier 5 Kongo has 54.100 HP. @MrConway @Crysantos @Tanatoy To be constructive here; you can either undo this change, because 52k HP at Tier 8 is just too low; or, you can "re-Tier" Odin into Tier 6 or 7, where there are ships with similar HP. -
I think i'll get Jean Bart at like last week of update 0.9.2. I already have Dunkerque and i think we can agree that they play the same way. I'll never get Smolensk, ever, i want to remain a relatively fair player. I mean, both Georgia and Jean Bart are yes really strong, but they do have weaknesses, they are not as as Smolensk that can just smoke up broadside to a battleship and just get overpenetrated.
-
What am I doing wrong ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Admiral_Oily_Discharge's topic in General Discussion
@Admiral_Oily_Discharge Btw, sigma is the "tendency" of the shells to land closer towards the center of the dispersion ellipse. The higher it is, the more consistent the shells are, tho you might still have crap salvos even with high sigma and god salvos with low sigma. -
What am I doing wrong ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Admiral_Oily_Discharge's topic in General Discussion
Kongo has 1.8 sigma. The problem is that that sigma value is so cursed. Sigma values of the tech tree battleships in WoWs IJN Sigma USN Sigma KM Sigma RN Sigma MN Sigma VMF Sigma Kawachi 1.8 South Carolina 1.9 Nassau 1.8 Bellerophon 1.8 Turenne 1.8 Knyaz Suvorov 1.5 Myogi 2.0 Wyoming 1.5 Kaiser 1.8 Orion 1.6 Courbet 1.8 Gangut 1.4 Kongo 1.8 New York 1.8 König 1.8 Iron Duke 1.8 Bretagne 1.8 Pyotr Velikiy 1.7 Fuso 1.5 New Mexico 1.5 Bayern 1.8 Queen Elizabeth 2.0 Normandie 1.6 Izmail 1.7 Nagato 2.0 Colorado 2.0 Gneisenau 1.8 King George V 1.8 Lyon 1.5 Sinop 1.7 Amagi 1.8 North Carolina 2.0 Bismarck 1.8 Monarch 1.8 Richelieu 1.8 Vladivostok 1.7 Izumo 2.0 Iowa 1.9 Friedrich der Große 1.8 Lion 1.8 Alsace 1.6 Sovetsky Soyuz 1.7 Yamato 2.1 Montana 1.9 Großer Kurfürst 1.8 Conqueror 1.8 Republique 2.0 Kreml 1.9 Sigma values of the premium battleships in WoWs IJN Sigma USN Sigma KM Sigma RN Sigma MN Sigma VMF Sigma Mikasa 1.8 Arkansas Beta 1.5 König Albert 1.8 Dreadnought 1.8 Dunkerque 1.7 Imperator Nikolai I 2.0 Ishizuchi 2.0 Texas 1.8 Prinz Eitel Friedrich 2.0 Warspite 2.0 Gascogne 1.9 Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya 1.8 Mutsu 1.8 Arizona 1.8 Scharnhorst 2.0 Duke of York 1.8 Jean Bart 1.9 Lenin 1.7 Ashitaka 1.8 W. Virginia 1941 1.8 Tirpitz 1.8 Hood 1.9 Bourgogne 1.8 Kii 1.7 Alabama 1.9 Nelson 1.9 Musashi 1.8 Massachusetts 1.7 Vanguard 2.0 Missouri 1.9 Thunderer 2.0 Viribus Unitis 1.8 Georgia 1.8 Giulio Cesare 1.9 Ohio 2.0 Roma 1.8 -
Thanks a lot. I just re-purchased it. I was planning to get it back at some point (i'm actually planning on getting back all the Tier 5 and some Tier 6 ships that i sold a while back, right now they are 11, nine tier 5 and 2 tier 6, i'm just not doing it right now due to slots and credits issues, but it's a long term project) but i got Kirov back right now so that i don't have to think about it any more.
-
What am I doing wrong ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Admiral_Oily_Discharge's topic in General Discussion
Just don't use HE with battleships, unless its a British BB, just stick with AP. HE is really good against DDs and bow-on BBs but due to the long reload it's better to just use AP, plus 356mm can overmatch (penetrate regardless of angling) any tier 5 BB bow and stern except for the Pyotr Velikiy. You can shoot at 20+ km with Kongo, but the problem is that at thos ranges the dispersion is very RNG, sometimes you get good slavos and other times you don't hit anything. I also suggest you to watch a lot of CC videos about How to play, tutorials an guides. -
How many Early Access British heavy cruisers have you got via "Random Bundles" available through "British Tokens"?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I got both Hawkins and Devonshire (tho i got Devonshire first and then Hawkins) -
What am I doing wrong ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Admiral_Oily_Discharge's topic in General Discussion
This is an old video form Flamu, but it might still be helpfull, at least gameplay wise. -
Just wanted you guys to know that you have my full support on this line split, and btw, they look extremely good. @MrConway @Crysantos I have one question tho; i have sold my Kirov and do i need to have it in my port to get it as a premium when the line split will hit the live servers or not? P.S. about the Riga (not the same one tho) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hldbhg0avXA
-
Do you use the "Artillery Plotting Room Modification 2" upgrade in Slot 6 on Tier IX/X USN BBs?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Of course i do, i only have Georiga as the Tier 9 american BB, but i'll use it on both Iowa and Montana (when i'll have them) -
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
And this was Narai today, my second "attept". Successfully completed with 5/5 stars in... the Sinop, i think it's the best pick for this operation, for BBs i mean. -
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
This was the first game of today. Second best in the team in Georgia. I was "grinding" credits for the ARP Kongo mission and it wasn't even a "full credit setup" (it was this , , , , , , , , ) -
That's exactly what i meant; since the ammount of steel that the majority of players can earn is limited (due to multiple reasons), players tend to save Steel for the Tier 10 ships as they are "better", unless if they specifically want those ships, which in that case, they would have already got them. I do support the decision to re-release them for coal
-
Furutaka --> "Furu" Gneisenau --> "G N" Shimakaze --> "Shima" Akizuki --> "Aki" Kitakaze --> "Kita" Harugumo --> "Haru" Lexington --> "Lady Lex" Graf Zeppeling --> "G Z" North Carolina --> "N C" Massachusetts --> "Massa" Pyotr Velikiy --> "Pyotr" Prinz Eitel Friedrich --> "P E F" Scharnhorst --> "Sharny" Pensacola --> "Pepsi Cola" Cleveland --> "Cleve"
-
Well, i can kind of see that point; Somers, Stalingrad and Bourgogne just overshadow the other steel ships right now.
-
What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?
wot_2016_gunner replied to Hanszeehock's topic in General Discussion
My first time doing Narai. I kind of cheated a bit, because i used Sinop . Tho 4 / 5 stars first time i think it's good. I didn't got that many credits, but i didn't had any premium account nor flags, i was just testing it to see how it was.
