wot_2016_gunner

@ColonelPete I think what she needs, if she really needs something, is a shorter fuse; she has the standard 0.033s fuse, i think that maybe 0.010s or 0.015s might be better. Haven't you considered the possibility that it might be you the one who's bad.

just for the record; a similar thing was done withe the Kirov class cruisers; they were originally supposed to have six 152mm guns in three dual turrets, but the soviet commanders requested the nine 180 mm guns that we have in game right now, but in the same turrets designed for the 152mm guns, resulting in very little work space and habitability problems. Yeap, it just so happened that they had the right ammount of turrets and 203mm guns laying around somewhere; how convenient Right, from this to this btw, the Vittorio Veneto class battleships were originally supposed to have 406mm guns, but due to the fact that it would have taken too long to design and build those guns, they were built with 381mm guns. I hope that we get this kind of ship as a Tier 9 Italian tech tree BB. Also, @Major1999 350mm was also the caliber originally intended for the Bismarck class and the re-fit of the Gneisenau. Then in 1938 they changed to 380mm

Man, have you read this part? "As a compromise, the new battlecruisers were to be armed with eight 35 cm (13.8 inch) guns."

Keep reading

This is from Wikipedia. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackensen-class_battlecruiser The initial design was approved on 30 September 1912, though the heads of the General Navy Department—Vizeadmiral (Vice Admiral) Günther von Krosigk and Konteradmiral (Rear Admiral) Reinhard Scheer—and the Weapons Department head, Vizeadmiral Gerhard Gerdes, had to submit any revisions they deemed were necessary. The design staff suggested using triple or even quadruple gun turrets to keep the displacement under the 30,000-ton limit. Another suggested alternative was to use six 38 cm (15 in) guns in twin turrets, one forward and two aft; Wilhelm II accepted that design on 2 May 1913, though Admiral Friedrich von Ingenohl, the commander in chief of the High Seas Fleet, preferred the 30.5 cm gun of the Derfflinger-class ships.[6] As a compromise, the new battlecruisers were to be armed with eight 35 cm (13.8 inch) guns.

Which already exists

Today i had this game in the Myoko; nothing special, but since it's weekend, i'll take it. Btw, i'm working towards Mogami; only 14k XP away.

That's right what i wanted to say

Hmm.... Guys, you can "hide" the HP bar if you turn off the Alternate Interface mode in the Option menu

Alaska. I've passed 1 milion Free XP recently too and i'm planning of getting it but right now i'm grinding a bit more Free XP so that i would have some leftover. I've been waiting to get Alaska basically since she was annnounced back in July 2018 (which was even before i started playing, just took a while for that ship to get in the game), but right now i'll wait.

@dommo77 First of all, this is the full build, ( https://wowsft.com/ship?index=PISC108&modules=12121&upgrades=114320&commander=PCW001&skills=2158003719&consumables=224 ) I suggest you go for the follwing order: - Priority target - Expert Marksman - Superintendent - Concealment expter - Expert loader - Last stand - Jack of all trades - Vigilance - Preventive maintenance I personally would go for spotter plane, tho if you don't feel confortable with spotter, just use the fighter. Also, i highly suggest you to Free XP (If possible) the Range Upgrade, the Italian Cruiser need all the range they can have due to the poor concealment, i mean, when i got Zara, i just Free XP the Range. Also, you might want to take a look at this video

With this battle in the Bismarck, the grind for the unloved Friedrich der Große has officially started. I also completed the second directive and with those tokes i got Visby (as soon as i got it i immediately changed flag to the Swedish one)

Tokens from the second directive: 10 - 20 - 20 - 10 - 10 A bit underwhelming, but they were still more than what i needed to get Visby (which i did)

Scharnhorst, Tirpitz and T-61

Just opened the two containers from the Daily shipments and they both had 20 tokens; which means that I'll surely get Visby with the containers from the second directive (which i'll complete shortly) even if they'll all have 10 tokens because i'm at 160 and i only need 40; while the absolute minimum that i can get from the second directive is 50 (which knowing WG RNG is a bit unlikely)

thx for the clarifications @Crysantos

The more i see it, the more i hate the ability of my teams to throw games that could be won easly; nullifying everyting you did for the team. 113k damage in my Myoko, yet, my team still managed to lose the game. So sad. And surprise surprise, i'm the first in my team, go figure.

Allright; nice collection and i was honeslty waiting for this article. My only problem is that the missions are restricted to Tier 10 and... I have no tier 10, max i have are Tier 9s, . I'm not really complaining, just wanted to say it. Apart from this, the missions are fine. Another possible issue is that basically everyone will start the collection due to the Daily Shipments, meaning that for those that don't have the ships to complete it, the collection will remain incomplete. Apart from this two thing, the rest is okay.

Thank you. Much Appreciated.

This was an old game that i forgot to post. A monster game in the La Galissonnière: 111k dmg; AA defense expert, High Caliber and Confederate and just short of 2.500 Base XP Replay ( 20200315_162133_PFSC106-La-Galissonniere_05_Ring.wowsreplay )

I got 40 from the first daily shipments container; then 10 - 20 - 10 - 40 from the first directive (i don't remember if it was in this order, but it doesn't matter) I should be able to get Visby, which is all i'm after, with the second directive + the last 2 daily shipments containers.

Still waiting for Shinano

Oh, i just re-found the Documentary about the A-1 Skyraider. There is also some brief history of the carrier aviation.

But these air brakes tho.

I see your point, tho i was hoping for the A2D Skyshark