Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

wot_2016_gunner

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6830
  • Clan

    [-URK-]

Everything posted by wot_2016_gunner

  1. wot_2016_gunner

    Cap Takes Control of World of Warships — All Hail Cap!

    That's also true . He's HYPERpotato @Klopirat Thx
  2. wot_2016_gunner

    Cap Takes Control of World of Warships — All Hail Cap!

    Small question, when you get Cap, how many skill points does he have? Just to know
  3. wot_2016_gunner

    Any ETA on Odin and Agir?

    Unknown But, are you seriously waiting for those ships? like really?
  4. wot_2016_gunner

    Update 0.9.2.1

    @AmiralPotato Let's just get some nostalgia with Phly It should be back in 0.9.3
  5. wot_2016_gunner

    Launch Day Calendar: April

    Reall good, but... Taiho is missing on April 7th (1943) and i can't be worng with it because April 7th is also my birthday, so... i can't forget it .
  6. wot_2016_gunner

    Your eu tokendrop for the first 4 containers

    Third directive completed 10 - 40 - 20 - 40 - 10 - 20. Which puts me at 200 tokens total (again).
  7. wot_2016_gunner

    Your eu tokendrop for the first 4 containers

    Yeah, i'm close ti finishing it, just need 900k credits and 200 Main Battery hits; the rest is already done.
  8. wot_2016_gunner

    What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?

    Just got the perma-camo for Visby
  9. wot_2016_gunner

    ST - Changes to test ships

    Right elevation line drawing of the design for the Number 13 class Class overview Builders: Kure Naval Arsenal Yokosuka Naval Arsenal Kawasaki Shipyard, Kobe Mitsubishi Shipyard, Nagasaki Operators: Imperial Japanese Navy Preceded by: Kii class Succeeded by: Yamato class Planned: 4 Cancelled: 4 General characteristics Type: Fast battleship Displacement: 47,500 t (46,700 long tons) (normal) Length: 274.4 m (900 ft 3 in) Beam: 30.8 m (101 ft 1 in) Draft: 9.8 m (32 ft 2 in) Installed power: 22 × water-tube boilers 150,000 shp (110,000 kW) Propulsion: 4 shafts; 4 × geared steam turbines Speed: 30 knots (56 km/h; 35 mph) Armament: 4 × twin 45.7 cm (18.0 in) guns 16 × single 14 cm (5.5 in) guns 8 × single 12 cm (4.7 in) AA guns 8 × 61 cm (24 in) torpedo tubes Armor: Waterline belt: 330 mm (13 in) Deck: 127 mm (5 in)
  10. wot_2016_gunner

    ST - Changes to test ships

    @Bunny_Lover_Kallen @Panocek On my magazine it says that the Kii were greatly inspired by the Amagi class, with the only very minor differences being that the Amagi was faster of about 0,25 knots while the Kii had more armour. I'm honestly wtill waiting for the Number -13 class with 4x2 457mm guns The same thing i thought
  11. wot_2016_gunner

    PT - European destroyers torpedoes and balance changes.

    Let me guess, the change was made to make them more in-line with the rest of the USN CAs that have 27mm plating bow, stern and sides, is it? It is a welcomed change tho
  12. wot_2016_gunner

    ST - Changes to test ships

    Well, as many i think will point out, i don't really see the need for it, but i'm kind of neutral on this; i'm not against it as i'm not in favour if it. I have the bad feeling that with the improved sigma she might feel better than Amagi, in the sense that having bettern sigma (and longer reload) while the other parameters would stay the same (i'm not saying that they are, it's just that you only shared the sigma and the reload) might result in a ship that it's just better than the tech-tree counterpart, because having a longer reload with better accuracy isn't really that big of a drawback; it's like a sniper rifle, you don't need the rate of fire of a machine gun when you can with (and most likely one-shot) stuff almost every time. So i think that she needs something else; maybe less range; or she might be slower or something. i know that the ship is subjected to change, but that's why i'm saying this, in my opinion she needs another drawback than just longer reload.
  13. wot_2016_gunner

    The best looking ship ?

    It's the "For meritorious service" camo
  14. wot_2016_gunner

    The best looking ship ?

    I've some other ships to add to the list, tho i'll hae to use IRL pictures due to the fact that i either don't have them, forgot to take screenshot or they are not in the game yet but they'll come (spoiler allert: Submarines) Type XXI U-boat (in game it will the the U-2501; the U-2540 is the one in the picture as a museum ship) Odin (it got nerfed, but it still looks good) USS Alaska IJN Akizuki IJN Shimakaze Last but not least; the IJN Mikasa; we can argue that in game she has no use, but she does still look good for a 100+ year old; btw, she turns 120 on November of this year.
  15. wot_2016_gunner

    The best looking ship ?

    Yamato Georgia Dunkerque (she's also a really good ship) Amagi Bismarck (and Tirpitz) Scharnhorst (and Gneisenau) The Kongo class in general Roma Honorable mention, any other ship
  16. wot_2016_gunner

    WGC: Log in to Experience It All

    Same for me and as with you, my only problems were either when my connection went crazy or when the problems were "global", with WG servers going crazy or hotfixes. I didn't even had any problems with mods (maybe because i don't use those that might have problems). My only problem with this "news article" was that i was confused about the "launcher" because i didn't know it even existed; i always thought that besides using a link to the .exe file, you could only launch the game via the WGC. When i first started playing in fact, i downloaded the installer, which downloaded the WGC, from which i downloaded WoWS.
  17. wot_2016_gunner

    Issues with the NVIDIA GeForce Updated Driver

    Well... I did updated the driver 2 days ago, but i have no issues at all. I did have some issues yesterday, but it was because of my connection, not the driver; in fact today i already launched the game twice with no issues. I might just be one of those that don't have the problem.
  18. wot_2016_gunner

    WGC: Log in to Experience It All

    @Klopirat Thx, but let me tell you that i've never seen that before.
  19. wot_2016_gunner

    WGC: Log in to Experience It All

    Guys, what do you mean with "launcher", because I'm a bit confused. Btw, it has been more than a year that i haven't used the WGC to do anything but for the download and installation updates; to start the game i use a link on my desktop to the .exe file.
  20. wot_2016_gunner

    What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?

    Mogami-gata junyoukan, Mogami, awaiting permission to joing the fleet. I've finally reached the Mogami; only researched it, didn't bought it; not becasue i don't have enough credits, i have way more then enough, it's just because i have other stuff to sort out. @piritskenyer about Main Battery Mod.2; I don't really need it, I checked Mogami's 155 turret treverse and it's the same as Myoko and i was perfectly confortable with Myoko's turret treverse; enchancing that would be good, don't get me wrong, but for me at least, there is no need for that. All I need are... I hope you get the meme.
  21. Just had an almost weekend like game with @Major1999 (he was in the Mutsu) in my team. he did allright, but our team just completely lost map control.
  22. wot_2016_gunner

    IFHE on Russian cruisers?

    Kirov also doesn't need IFHE as the HE pen is 30mm
  23. wot_2016_gunner

    New clan base factory?

    I really like the idea. I was going to make a Clan suggestion, but i just didn't know what the clan bonuses could have been for, so, you beated tìme on this one. I'd like to suggest what WG could use as the structures fot this, those indicated by the red arrow in the picture.
  24. wot_2016_gunner

    What Were Your Greatest Gaming Achievements Today ?

    I'm very close to Mogami guys; only 4k XP away, but i'll get it tomorrow, i'm in no hurry. This was today's first battle (in Myoko of course). I have to say Myoko is hell of fun, slow turret treverse (and i have Expert Marskman), but other than that it's probably still the best Tier 7 cruiser. Also, this was today's first Daily "resourse" container (right after this battle)
×