Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

wot_2016_gunner

Players
  • Content Сount

    2,588
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6830
  • Clan

    [-URK-]

Everything posted by wot_2016_gunner

  1. wot_2016_gunner

    World of Warships Advent Calendar

    That's... apreciated
  2. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    Flamu's opinion
  3. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    ah, i don't really follow the streams much so didn't know. Yeah, as i said way back then, for me at least there's no reward that is worth grinding 5 Tech-Tree Tier 10s, which is already an effort, and then re-grinding lines. Same; i don't have many friends to begin with, but even if i had, i wouldn't recommend the game. I have one friend that "played" WoWS, but he's a WoT guy, he just played it a bit but a lot of time ago. Another one played Blitz and i think he's playing Legends but i'm not sure.
  4. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    kinda, but at least everyone can get them, it's their choise wheter to do it or not, where with the NTC, you had to regrind lines in order to get those buffs and 1 to everyone was willing to do that; 2 the new players that were grinding the line for the first time would have been at a great disadvantage to those who had the buff.
  5. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    You know that the great majority on players HATE to play against CVs. Honestly i don't know how you can defend that class. I did played CVs before, not because i liked them, but because it was another line to grind, but it has been about a couple of months that i haven't touched a CV, got bored the hell out of them. And, as our great @El2aZeR said:"So yeah, whenever you see someone claim "reWoRkEd CVs aRe mUcH wEaKeR nOw", call bull on it." WG never really listen to our feedback they only listed on their "own" feedback, i.e. spreadsheets and stats, like battle influence for example (yes, that's a stat the WG uses, and CVs are the ones with the most Battle infuence) They don't even listen to the CCs, what makes you thin they'll listen to people in the forum? they even contradicted themselves recently: in the latest Q&A they said this and about 2 weeks later they nerf Kita's concelament (not that big of a deal tho) but like, don't tell me that this stuff goes from balanced to in "need of a nerf" in i 2 weeks Lastly, even when the backlash in HUGE, like with the NTC, where there were fan sites shutting down in protest, they delaied it and changed it to something more berable, The Research Bureau, however, since they put the Legendary Upgrades (which have been rebalanced) in it, it basically became the NTC all over again; it's not as bad as the original, because that would mean hell for WG, but it's still NTC. It's not that me, @Cammo1962, @Lc4Hunter and others are not open to new changes, it's just that by our experience, if a change is bad for the game, we "have to" call it out say "hey, this is not good for the game; it's going to brutalize certain ships or make others stong, exc.", we might not be able to change anything but atleast we try. There was a time when WG listened to feedback, most notably in the form of the UK CLs; the origianlly had HE, but the CCs and the community realized that this was toxic for the game and so WG removed HE and gave them better AP anlges; but not any more. One last thing, at least for me: I CARE about the game (hopefully i'm not the only one) i care in which direction is going, i care about what the community fells about it (for example, maybe WG won't satisfy me personally. but if the community is "happy" about a certain thing, example and event, then i'm happy too) Also I'm in this game not just to play a game, if there was another game like WoWS i wouldn't be here (WT just introduced BBs, but it's a long way from WoWS); i play this game because I LOVE ships, and that's what's keeping me in the game despite anything that happened and that will happen.
  6. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    WG puts this BS at the end of everyone of their dev blogs; and it doesn't mean anything; yes, changes might happen, but: 1 the changes could go both ways; 2, most importantly, it is basically sure that this thing will end up in the live server, and that's what we don't want.
  7. Becaue the reload booster is temporary (forgetting about the cooldown) Tho, i agree with what @ColonelPete said
  8. It has SAP, they can't really buff the reload
  9. ST 0.10.0, CHANGES TO AUSTIN, ADDING UPGRADE FOR SKIP BOMBERS New upgrade added for skip bombers, and parameters updated for American Tier X cruiser Austin The "Skip bombers. Modification 2" upgrade added. It is placed in the 4 slot and increases skip bombers' amount of HP by 7.5%. American cruiser Austin, Tier X: Number of charger for "Main Battery Reload Booster" consumable changed from 1 to unlimited. Unlimited number of charges for the "Main Battery Reload Booster" consumable and rather low survivability will form special "ragged" gameplay for the ship during the entire battle. Please note that all information in the development blog is preliminary. Announced adjustments and features may change multiple times during testing. The final information will be published on our game's website. Are you... out of your minds?
  10. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    Are you sure? Because akaif Atlanta for example as been completely butchered.
  11. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    Are we playing the same game?
  12. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    Oh, btw, the new Expert marksman (+20% turret treverse) is a nerf to any BB with a Turret treverse speed lower than 3,5°/s (as 20% of 3,5 is 0,7°/s, the current one); for ships with exactly 3,5°/s, like Bayern for example, it's not going to change anything, while it will be a buff for ships with a higher turret treverse, like Kremlin and Ohio.
  13. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    Same @The_Chiv I completely agree.
  14. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    That's actually a thing players are asking since the CV rework, removing the spotting frmo fighters; this is just a skill but it's something
  15. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, changes to new skill system (DB 104)

    I'm still very opposed and mad about this change; 21 points is the only "good thing", even tho there are problems with skill gaps. What makes me really mad is the removal of FP from cruisers; If i'm using a BB build on a arge cruiser or i'm using last stand on a ship that looses its rudder all the time, it's not because i'm missuing a skill or i'm abusing a game mechanic, it's because it's the best build for the ship. So, either you give back FP or you reduce the fire duration of large cruisers to 45s. and the answer doesn't even answer the question because you adress it with pretty much no skill involving survivability.
  16. wot_2016_gunner

    black friday

    I'm not really doing thoes; bit too much grind for just a handful of standard container, plus no sinergy with Key Battles. I might complete the first one (not sure) but i doubt i'll get anything.
  17. wot_2016_gunner

    Twitch Code

    @Crazyfox55555 Stream only code, it only works during the stream. Tho it only gave you a Pearl Harbour flag and a couple of camos.
  18. wot_2016_gunner

    New Ships Announced

    Agreed, it remind me of this Flamu video
  19. wot_2016_gunner

    Naval Legends: Pearl Harbor Trailer

    if you want to know Pearl Harbour then watch this
  20. wot_2016_gunner

    F2P PSA: Black Friday Credit Discounts

    Thx, i already made use of the upgrades discounte with my Mogami (i didn't had any other Tier 8+ ships in need of Upgrades); and with the discount of US ships i bought Helena (+upgrades) and i also bought back NY and Omaha (that i sold a long time ago) for collection and, you know, 800 more coal this Christmas.
  21. Really an Pan-Asian Akizuki (now nerfed to hell) and now a Pan Asian Alsace and a Pan Asian CV!!!!!!! HELL NO
  22. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.10.0, new ships. (DB 102)

    Well: Fiandre is... interesting Immelman... it was to be expected since W. Voss existed, but is another CV and the discussion stops here. Austin... uh... this summes it up the OG design for those who wonder My main concern about the new ships is that they are 2 Tier 10 and one Tier 8 premium ships, and it just feels to me like WG is kinda neglecting mid tiers.
  23. wot_2016_gunner

    ST 0.9.11, changes to Italian Battleships

    Edited; re-read the dev blog; nvm
  24. wot_2016_gunner

    Weekly Combat Missions: Thanksgiving Day

    the discounts will be active for 4 days; you can check in Port
×