floribe2000

I edited two posts (I didn't read the rest of the thread, I will probably have to do that later) including the opening post because of formatting issues. Please make sure not to copy-paste color-formatted text, if you do please remove the formatting after pasting the text (there should be an option like "paste as plain text" in the editor).

Thread closed. Bans longer than 3 days are usually manual chatbans or at least manually apporved chat bans. If it happens regularly, it's also most likely not a mistake of the system (a single mistake may happen, it's impossible to prevent that but mutliple mistakes like that are really unlikely). I'm pretty sure that the chat bans were not unjustified if you receive them so often.

Diskussionen und Anfragen an den Clan bitte per PN und nicht im Rekrutierungstherad. Danke.

Thread geschlossen. Das eigentliche Thema ist schon über ein Jahr alt und nicht mehr ganz aktuell. Bevor hier eine weitere CV Diskussion entsteht, mach ich hier mal zu.

Nein. Eine Stalingrad ist zwar präzise, aber bei weitem nicht so böse wie eine Pobeda war. Das Kaliber, der Pen und der Alpha Schaden machen einen massiven Unterschied, außerdem ist die Stalin deutlich weicher und frisst Schaden in die Breitseite. Die Original Pobeda hatte nen Kremlin Rumpf.

Ein schönes Beispiel, was passiert, wenn man das RNG reduziert, war ja an der Pobeda in der ersten Version zu sehen (inzwischen heißt das Ding ja Slawa und wurde ordentlich generft). Das Ding war so genau, dass das RNG nur recht wenig Einfluss hatte. Was die Spieler davon hielten, hatte man ja sehr deutlich mitbekommen. Das ging dann teilweise so weit, dass einige Gegner einfach nur noch abgehauen sind, sobald das Ding auf einer Seite der Map gespottet war, da ihnen bewusst war, dass dieses Ding mehr oder weniger alleine eine gesamte Flanke aufräumen und gewinnen konnte. Also nein danke, sowas muss echt nicht sein. Das Ding war zwar spaßig, aber so wenig RNG ist echt nicht gut fürs Balancing.

Thread closed. Do you really think, posting basically the same thread 4 times will change anything except of increasing your warning points for spamming?

I take this as a confirmation that you have no interest in a discussion at all. Thread closed.

That's the feed for the devblog website: https://blog.worldofwarships.com/rss-en.xml

Da das hier schon wieder eine allgemeine Diskussion wird: Thread geschlossen. Nutzt den bestehenden CV Thread.

Ok, I'll take a different approach: Let's use the balancing as an argument. You claim that being able to shoot HE significantly influences a ship's performance in battle. So in consequence this means, that it's a factor in a ship's influence to a battle. So let's look at some statistics: These images show the WR of a player with that ship compared to his average WR on that tier. Or in other words: The influence of a ship compared to the average influence of the player. Now, let's have a look at them in detail: Thunderer is almost perfect, all others are below the average (except for Kremlin and we ignore the values below 40% and above 65% because there are not enough players). The interesting thing here is, that the only ship that is really above average is Kremlin. All others are average or below average. Now, what could happen if we reduce the HE range? According to your theory, their efficiency will decrease because right now, HE is strong as their AP (that's what you said!). In consequence, their influence to the battle will decrease as well. It's not that difficult to see that this would mean that they would be worse than now and no longer be balanced (they would be too weak). So my conclusion is, that nerfing their HE range is not only unnecessary but also a bad idea because it might screw the balancing. But I have another argument: Let's assume we reduce the HE range for all battleships and cruisers (you linked wiki pages to the battleship overview and cruiser overview so I assume you want to nerf both classes). Let's take Henri IV as example: Current base range, without any modifications, is 19 km. You want to reduce this range, let's say to 16km. This would force her to get closer to the enemy than before because AP against angled targets at range is useless, especially regular cruiser AP (not talking about Stalingrad AP, that's a different thing). In return, it becomes easier for the enemy to hit her. Since you don't want to change anything about the AP this would mean that it is now easier to hit her because BB AP works even better against cruisers at this distance. Result: The cruiser becomes weaker while the BB gets even stronger. And tbh, this nerf is not really necessary... So both of these arguments show that it is not a good idea to reduce the HE range while not changing AP. Of course, nerfing the HE of T10 ships would help T8 ships but keep in mind, there has to be a difference between T8 and T10. And there are more than enough T10 ships that don't even have to use HE against T8 ships (and most players just shoot AP against T8 ships, no matter if they are angled or not, your superstructure is usually large enough to get lots of damage and also T8 armor is usually not as strong as T10 armor). So changing HE wouldn't affect the interaction between T8 and T10 ships at all. Only cruisers would suffer here. So let's take a look at some T8 HE spammers: Some of them are above average but most of them, especially those who are just HE spammers and don't have utility like radar or a MBRB to boost their artillery temporary and punish mistakes, are average or below. Reducing HE ranges would have the same affect as with T10 cruisers, even worse, they now have even bigger trouble against T10 ships. Do you really want that?

So thanks for confirming that you just don't understand the game. You don't have to go that close with Montana, Her AP works fine on distances between 15-20km as well. And same for Repu. Because of her AP, using HE is useless in almost every situation. As before, you were still not able to explain why they need lower range. I explained why they are fine, you didn't provide any counter-arguments except for quoting their stats.

I don't understand what you want to say with that. I don't see anyone defending anything, I only see some non-existing arguments from you and responses criticising your "arguments".

So as I expected, you don't have arguments at all. You know how a discussion works, do you? But, to take some of your "arguments" (I actually agree that UK BBs shouldn't have this HE but I disagree with different HE ranges): Republique: Uses mostly AP, if you use HE you waste potential and I just ignore Repus spamming HE at me. I don't see any reason to nerf her HE range. It's not a problem of the ship's range or ammo but of the player of the ship. Bourgogne: Has a low caliber and depends on chosing the right ammo. Yes, you often use HE but you also use AP. Just spamming HE wastes potential and there is no reason to limit her HE range either because you already take away lots of her strength by spamming HE. Why do you want to punish players for playing her as intended? Montana: If someone really shoots that much HE on long range with Montana, you don't belong into any BB above T5. It's not just ineffective, it's mostly useless. Montana AP is so much better than her HE, even at range against angled targets because of the plunging fire. So, your turn: Why should WG reduce the (HE) range of these ships instead of just nerfing HE on ships like the UK BBs? Reduce damage and fire chance, ok, that's something I agree with. Edit: AP also loses penetration on long range causing ships like cruisers to rely on their HE. Taking away this option will render some cruisers useless.

So you just confirm that you don't have a real argument here? Select a ship (or more, that's your choice) and explain, why that ship needs lower range. Everything else is just a subjective opinion without anything to back it up.

Verschiedene WG Accounts können nicht miteinander verknüpft werden.

Thread and survey closed because this thread violates rule 4: Don't spam (Repeatedly posting the same content).

Thread geschlossen. Die ursprüngliche Frage wurde beantwortet, die letzten Beiträge waren nur noch Off Topic.

Thread closed. If you were chat banned for insulting someone, it was justified. Maybe you don't care about being called "idiot" or "noob" but other players do. And calling someone an idiot IS an insult. If you got 15 days it was not the first time and it was a manual chat ban so don't worry, it's not a problem of the automated system. If you reall think your chatban was unjustified, send a PM to someone from WG and ask for your chat logs. Usually @MrConway is happy to tell you what you said. Until now I didn't see unjustified chatbans. Just behave in chat. If you can't control your emotions, you can also disable your chat (although I wouldn't recommend it because it's the only way to communicate with the team).

Gamemodels3D listet einige Sektionen mit HP, aber gibt nicht bei allen genau an, wo die sind. Für Schiffe ab T8 ist der Zugang allerdings nicht kostenlos (da es eine von WG unabhängige Seite ist).

Thread geschlossen, da die Frage beantwortet wurde. Alle Besitzer der Perma-Tarnung behalten diese, diejenigen, die sie nicht haben, bekommen sie kostenlos. Man mag davon halten was man will, das wurde so festgelegt und wurde auch in anderen Threads ausreichend diskutiert, da brauchen wir nicht noch einen weiteren Thread dazu.

Jede Sektion hat ihre eigenen HP, die Mittelsektion hat z.B. normalerweise mehr HP als der Bug oder die Aufbauten. Das ist je nach Schiff unterschiedlich verteilt. Kleinere Aufbauten können schneller gesättigt sein, müssen es aber nicht, da das auch ein Balancing Faktor ist. Du bekommst die Forschungspunkte nur für Schiffe, die zurückgesetzt wurden. In deinem Beispiel setzt du T6 und T7 mit zurück, erspielst sie danach aber nicht wieder. Beim Reset der 2. Linie werden die beiden Stufen nicht resettet, da du sie noch nicht wieder hast, somit bekommst du keine weiteren Forschungspunkte dafür.

Ich hab einen unangebrachten Beitrag entfernt. Bitte vermeidet provokante historische Vergleiche.

Ich hab hier mal etwas aufgeräumt. Bitte denkt daran, dass das hier NICHT die Frusttherapie ist! Außerdem haben Provokationen, Beleidigungen und Trolling hier nichts verloren und werden entsprechend sanktioniert. Thread wieder geöffnet.

Thread geschlossen. Die Frage wurde schon einmal so gestellt und auch beantwortet.