Jump to content

Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

Players
  • Content Сount

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    346

About Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

  1. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Double CV matches... Why?

    Mostly an issue in 4-6 tier CVs, while I usually stopped caring at T6 games cause the defensive fire is so ridiculous that most carriers just lose their planes on attempting to deal damage on up tiered games, so it doesn't really matter if it's 1v2 and your team mate is a bot CV.
  2. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Double CV matches... Why?

    I hate it, there are people who play CVs and don't like to coordinate or communicate with the team. It's been 50/50 for me, either I get stuck with someone who doesn't want to work together to win the air superiority battle or someone who is really helpful and communicates which usually leads us to rolfstomp the enemy CV team. Two CVs have a huge impact to the game and doesn't really give room for errors, which can be rather toxic for new CV players to learn since it can be a very frustrating experience when you get overwhelmed by enemy CV fighters and your team mate doesn't want to help you deal with the problem.
  3. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Starting to play CV's

    The developers briefly talk about it on their new waterline video series on the wargaming youtube channel if you are interested to know more from their perspective. The carrier rework is mostly on it's prototype stages so they are waiting for it to be stable until they can share more information about it basically.
  4. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Starting to play CV's

    Basically they will rework the way carrier is played in-game, the details about it is unknown other than it being more accessible for someone who never played with RTS games and a bit more action based, they probably will not have any premium carriers for sale such as Graf Zeppelin until they are done with the rework, but this is just a guess there could be a possibility that premium carriers will return to the gift store even if the rework isn't finished. You will have to wait for them post more news about it.
  5. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Worried CV Rework

    That reminds me that Jingles mentioned the new CV gameplay being getting to aim certain parts of a ship when he came back from Russia, which kinda does sound familiar to WoWS blitz.
  6. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Even the Community Contributors know you're *edit, WG.

    These changes are very recent, if you haven't played within 2-3 months you probably wouldn't have noticed. Since they are even finally now addressing the long time problem that people had with premium P-47s and P-47s in general. They also were wanting to increase the Me-262 rating even further but based by player feedback in the forums these changes didn't happen. Their shift of listening to feedback is very noticeable now as they even have Q&As on every Shooting Range video shows they are actively reading and answering feedback.
  7. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Even the Community Contributors know you're *edit, WG.

    What you are speaking is true, Ive been playing WT since 2013 and I know how they got worse in time. But they only recently eliminated the communication problem they been suffering between developer and player and hence why they are now drastically making changes to Navy branch of the game by bringing in much bigger ships such as cruisers, they also been now changing matchmaking ratings based by player feedback when they present their suggested changes. I can confirm this such as I been one of the vocal players who been trying to push in changes and they been finally heard. I just hope to see Wargaming to improve their communication with the playerbase and not repeat the same mistakes as their younger competitor has been suffering for past 5 years, before they finally wake up that player feedback is very important for the success of their own game.
  8. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Worried CV Rework

    I would wait until we get more information on what the rework will be like but if it's really going to be 1 squadron at a time, I wonder if there would be any point of using fighter squadrons since you wouldn't be able to do any offensive attacks to ships other than spotting them or people will simply have a mutual agreement not to use fighters and go with strike aircrafts, this really wouldn't be a solution for the problem.
  9. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Historical discussion section in the forums?

    Thank you for the answers, appears there is only one thread related to the subject.
  10. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Even the Community Contributors know you're *edit, WG.

    to be fair War Thunder is getting pretty close to be a proper competitor to WoWS since they added cruisers on their latest naval test. Gaijin entertainment has also had a long term issue not listening to playerbase feedback but is now actually working towards that after 5 years of ignorance of player feedback. There are things WG could do for example hire player moderators to moderate player suggestions in the forums and share the best suggestions to the WG staff, atleast this is how War Thunder usually does to save staff and resources to implement new content and do balancing changes. Think wargaming could atleast have a suggestion section in the forum for constructive criticism and content/balance discussions that is easy to follow and not lost in general discussion.
  11. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    Historical discussion section in the forums?

    Hello, I noticed that the forum doesn't really have a section to talk about historical events or just to post or read random unofficial historical articles made by the community and I wonder if I am just blind and can't find it?
  12. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    The Carrier Problem

    It's cool and nice that AA mounts can be destroyed, but it's rather hard to know how many or what AA modules are destroyed so you still generally will still avoid ships with good AA for the sake not losing your precious reserves on a hunch or a gamble..
  13. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    The Carrier Problem

    Simple answer AA defensive fire needs to be reworked or removed, my opinion it shouldn't increase the existing DPS but keep the panic feature since it's already a good mechanic to discourage carriers to drop their load.
  14. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    First to solve get 2500 doubloon

    loss of brain usage loss of mental capacity loss of mental thought loss of rational thinking loss of humanity loss of brain function loss of brain loss of brain activity loss of brain volume loss of brain tissue Am I getting closer?
  15. Carrier_Graf_Zeppelin

    First to solve get 2500 doubloon

    loss of brain cells
×