Egoleter

No, he doesn't. As far as I know the rule is still innocent until proven otherwise. Not the other way 'round.

You don't know when it is better to stop, do you?

Nothing to crash here actually. But still... sorry, I'll find the door on my own.

And suddenly we are moving fromclans being the bad guys to Supertesters being the bad guys. Thank you, Nibloke. I always wanted to be a bad guy. Here is a celebration egg only for you.

Wow. I never knew. So where is the Monster?

Ok, I see. Well we had that for the Hunt for Bismark too. A complete list of tasks and their rewards. WG-EU usually is simply slower in adding it. That is one thing they actually did improve a little.

Doublepost. Sorry.

Doesn't matter. Now instead of mistrust against one clan, it has the potential to create it for all clans. Nothing about this topic is helping the community in any capacity.

That's probably similar to the Hunt for Bismark event. If you complete the collection you gain the skins. What I am more concerned about is that recieving the Gallant is hidden behind a luck wall. You have to draw a special supercontainer to get it. If you do not have the luck to get that container your only other option is to buy the ship. You can not actually earn the ship during the campaign. Considering the amount of special containers I had in the Hunt for Bismark (zero, zilch, nada), I guess some players will be mighty disappointed. Or will there be a task that will grant an event-SC for sure?

Those should have been the only things you do (though I don't know why exactly you involved Tuccy). If the players really rigged something and the replay proves it, then support will act accordingly. Posting it here is not actually helping the community in any way, as it at best creates mistrust and uncertainty when the same clan tag is seen on both sides of a ranked match.

No, you name and shame the whole clan with all its members instead. That is clearly a lesser rule violation.

Well I am only here to see how long it takes until it is taken down by the moderators. I'm not defending anything and I'm not questioning anything (except the OPs motives for using medieval age justice systems).

Before I am watching the replay, I'm telling you that name and shame is still not allowed on these forums. Would someone share his popcorn with me? I'll offer some nachos.

Wouldn't lessen my workload or the amount of content, and apparently there is no time to read those long posts, but at least the questions could be concise. Now would they be answered in full context or would only the question be considered? Which is something we already have bad examples for, with the context in some cases being eliminated in thread cleanups in this very thread.

Thanks for jumping in, @Kandly If you want me to write up all the history to make you understand the issues I am addressing then you will be in for a veeeeeeery long and detailed post. And I will be in for a lot of work to collect those details again. A short version is simply no longer possible. To many things accumulated over the past 18 months that I am playing this game. In all that time, despite all promises, almost nothing actually changed noticably for the better.

I know that @MrConway is working. He has been active on the forums and he's been on streams and Q&As. Nope, holidays are not a convincing argument. And I doubt he's been on a continuos holiday since the end of March.

Yes, that would be kind of sad. There are so many ways this could have been handled. "Sorry, I'm currently busy and can't provide the promised reply", "Sorry, I am not allowed to post the answers to those questions", "Sorry, the topic is more complex then I thought and I need more time for a proper reply", those would all have been potential replies to at least buy more time. Complete silence, after giving a promise for a reply with a target date, is just another confirmation of the bad communication we were complaining about (among other things). Which is the one thing Wargaming EU actually promised to improve so often that I can't even remember how often they told us they are working on it. I wouldn't spam it, no need to annoy others who might enjoy a livestream, but a single reminder in each one of those would be acceptable.

A PM send to @MrConway in June has not even been read until today. Am I on some kind of ignore list? Well this is a clear sign how much worth a promise by @MrConway has. None. That is exactly why we become increasingly aggitated. That is exactly why some questions are posted in a hostile manner. @MrConway if that is how you honor your promises you have no foot to stand on in questioning our tone in our questions towards you. I told you before that respect has to be earned that it is a two way street. You just showed us that you do not respect us at all. So I will stop showing any respect to you. @Kandly @Tuccy @Ph3lan or anyone else from Wargaming EU want to jump in here? We have been very patient with you. If you don't know it you need to start realizing it. That whole issue is not a good example for proper customer relationship management. Despite all your promises there is no real improvement on that front. The very rare decend responses and decisions, spread over several months, certainly do not make up for all the failures that were and still are happening on your end. I will not quote the posts in regards to the above. They have been quoted and linked often enough in this thread.

No email for me either but I did recieve the two set of signals and premium time. I am as clueless about it as everyone else but chose not to look the gift horse into the mouth to deeply. Enjoy your weekend.

Public reminder: Three months now, MrConway. (There is also a PM. If someone is seeing him ingame or on a stream it would be nice to put a reminder there as well.)

All of them. Whenever I return from battle my GPU is starting to increase its workload and is drawing much more power from my PSU. When I enter a battle the GPU calms down again. The port is the only occasion my GPU fans need to work. During battle my card is running completly silent (fans disabled). So the ports obviously are more demanding then the game itself for some reason.

Is it just me (probably) or is any one else not seeing any entries under Important Topics, WG Staff Posts and Recent Entries on the forum overview (home) page? Looks like the report function also broke for me.

So you say self justice through physical harm is some form of educational tool? Grow up.

If you have problems withg moderation discuss them privatly or send a ticket to support. No, we should not be allowed to name&shame. End of story.

So there is something you have no influence about? That's called life. Wargamings insistence to not remove detonation is telling me that they see it as necessary part of the game. In the end it is their game and they make the decisions about the game rules and mechanisms. They probably see it as a way to make money (selling signals) and that is their rightfull choice. If they would want us to be able to completly ignore it, they wouldn't have implemented it in the first place. Implementing an abusable system to achieve that ignorance might sound good to you but it certainly doesn't sound like a good idea to me, and I'm sure it doesn't sound good to WG either. I proposed better ways to do that. Why not do something constructive and provide one yourself that isn't "I don't like it, remove it"? My only issue with detonations is that they can happen from splash damage caused by shells not even hitting the ship, not to mention penetrating your armor.