Egoleter

5 to 10 seconds is an eternity in regards to network connections. If it happens regularly, I strongly recommend switching from wireless to a LAN-cable. This is a problem on your end, not with the game.

Das habe ich, und viele andere, an anderer(en) Stelle(n) bereits ausführlich Kundgetan. Für mehr Details z.B. diesen Link klicken. Der wichtigste Wunsch aus dem Thread: Ein minimal Modus. Ohne Browser oder anderen Schnickschnack. Wirklich nur zum Updaten und Starten der installierten Titel. Selbstätig schließend wenn ein Titel gestartet wurde (ohne im Hintergrund einen Service zu hinterlassen oder sich in der Tray zu verstecken).

Aktuell gibt es diese Funktion nicht. Da sie keinen Platz wegnehmen, und keine Silberpreis Entsprechung haben, glaube ich auch nicht, dass es diese Option jemals geben wird.

Anbetracht der Zahlen, die stellenweise für manche Ingame-Events veröffentlicht wurden, ist dies nicht außerhalb des möglichen Mengenbereichs. Nicht jeder Spieler spielt jeden Tag. Ich kenne Spieler die nur alle paar Wochen mal ein paar Runden drehen. Dann darf man nicht vergessen das Spieler zu unterschiedlichen Tageszeiten spielen. Die 25.000 die wir am Abend haben sind zumeist nicht die gleichen Spieler wie die 2.000 die früh Morgens oder die 10.000 die gegen Mittag spielen. Selbst innerhalb dieser Zeitfenster geben sich die Spieler die Klinke in die Hand. Dann wie von McMurmel erwähnt auf die anderen Server aufgerechnet und man kommt schnell auf mehrere hundertausend Spieler pro Tag. Man unterschätzt sowas schnell, weil es außerhalb der eigenen Wahrnehmung liegt.

Die Mission läuft weiter und du hast irgendwann das Modul zweimal.

This screenshot, taken just a few seconds ago, is pretty much self explaining. Hint:

Even if they are sanctioned they can break at patch days. They are a third party product. They can not be up to date the moment Wargaming patches their game. They may need a few days for their creators to update them too.

From the patch notes: I agree with everyone else here, that it would have been better to keep that number in clear sight.

Any installed, yet not updated, mods that could interfere with the chat window?

That was the intent behind it: Reward the players who had both with a small mission. Wargaming wanted them to be seperate duplicates.

Those are the daily missions. Split into two mission parts (Daily mission 1 / Daily mission 2) with the rewards spread between them

I'm not a fan of placing all the premium ships into the "Armory", or the current performance of the armory which is visibly stressed by all the content that was pressed into it. The reasons in detail: There is a general 300 doubloon price increase for added content many of us don't need. Sell them as bundles if you like but give us non-bundle versions too. We can, at any time, purchase port slots and 3-point captains with doubloons anyway. If we should need them. Stats of the ships are no longer available ingame until you spend the money to purchase those premium ships. This makes it necessary to visit exterior sources to actually know what you are purchasing. The long content list filled with images, makes for very long loading times if you load the armory in the game client. Even if called through an actual webbrowser the loading time until all content is displayed is catastrophic. I get déjà vu's of my old dial up times with 33,6k modems. While my real browser can store that content for the next time I need it, the ingame one apparently is not as capable.

Mit jedem Abfeuern deiner Geschütze wird die Uhr zurück gestellt und die 20 Sekunden beginnen erneut.

Entweder ein eher bescheidener Aprilscherz, oder drei Monate zu spät.

You'll be able to remove it next week, when the new patch hits, for no cost. Most of us seem to agree that the module for the Shimakaze isn't worth it unless you play with the useless 20 km torps at max range.

Forum rules are vague because users try to circumvent them if they arn't. We are drifting into offtopic territory. The thread is about the forum and how to deal with different formatting on the various available themes. Not about how or why a moderator acts.

A protest that aims at annoying your peers is always the wrong way to achieve something. Even now an acknowledgement is all we have. We do not have any promise for change. And if it has been acknowledged, then why not simply accept that the priority applied to it is not the same as the one you hoped for? Yes, it is easy to fix. It is also easy for us users to find ways to make the text readable still. Maybe that's exactly why it has such a low priority.

All I remember is posts in unrelated threads complaining about the formatting. We never had a dedicated thread for it before. At least not one that got any attention by more then two or three users.

I think his campaign was rather stupid and that there would have been far better ways to make yourself heard then to annoy other forumites to the extend of getting yourself banned.

The problem started when Wargaming updated their forum software a while ago, allowing us to use colors rather freely. They soon disabled that function but the forum still accepts foreign formatting. This foreign formatting causes issues with the different forum themes when you copy and paste texts from other sources. What we would need is for the forum to automatically convert all copy&pasted content to the default values. The software is able to recognize such formatting, evidenced by the editor suggesting that you could convert all pasted content. All it needs is for the software to be reprogrammed to always consider this suggestion to be confirmed. That shouldn't be to hard to implement. In pseudo code: if (FormattingDialogShown) { FormattingToDefaultConfirm = true; } That's all it really needs. Ok... the reality is a bit more complex. But not by much. There is a function that discovers formatted text. There is a function that calls the message onto the editor screen. There is a function to convert the text if the message is confirmed. What might be missing is a boolean value to the message bar when displayed that allows the above pseudo code to work. It shouldn't conflict with moderators having access to the text color feature, which should be linked to a permission setting.

Ok, so you should be far beyond the account level necessary to access that feature. Maybe you should try contacting customer support then. That option sounds like the most fitting: https://eu.wargaming.net/support/en/products/wows/help/8677/8697/8698/ Scroll down till you see the button "CREATE TICKET" and click on it. Describe your problem in detail. Attach your screenshots. You might want to link to this thread too.

How many battles did you play so far?

As I understand it, you want to invite someone else with your invite link. Is that correct? Are you logged in to the main WoWs website? Can you visit this page? https://playtogether.worldofwarships.eu/ Can you post what you see (a screenshot for example) how the page looks like if you can access it?

Didn't the various WoWs communities recently decide that it is best to not change premium ships with WG following that nonsense? Now ARP and Dragon ships are essentially premiums, so this would be in line with that recent announcement to no longer balance premiums. I said overall balance is more important but the crowd didn't want to listen, so this is the result. We made our bed now we have to sleep in it.

German carriers submarines confirmed.