Egoleter

You can get one reward for each achievement per day. You can get them in random and ranked battles only.

Which is supposed to tell us what? That you don't like americans? That is not an argument at all.

That is not what we are complaining about. If you bothered to read the arguments, you would know that.

You didn't read anything posted here did you? It is not about the missions themself. It is about Wargaming EU treating us differently / worse then the rest of the servers treat their players. We want equal treatment for all. If their treatment gets worse or ours getting better doesn't matter to me, as long as we all are the same for every Wargaming branch office.

There is a response on the spanish forums: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/41129-misiones-de-arpeggio-of-blue-steel-discusion-general/page__st__580__pid__1400210#entry1400210 The core message is that they want to force us to play the higher tiers. Nothing about unequal treatment between the servers, instead an attemted excuse that the mission is not actual harder then the US one and that you can tier up by using weekend specials and daily win bonuses or doubloons (so they discriminate because they are greedy). So they are excluding a part of the player base intentionally. If that is their official answer (I'm waiting for MrConway to confirm) my ticket to support is already prepared. It clearly shows that they do not make their missions in accordance to their communities interests like they so often proclaim.

Not in the anime. And the ARP collaboration with Wargaming is for the anime content only as far as I am aware.

I want an apology because Wargaming EU is discriminating us in comparison to other servers. Repeatedly. I want equal treatment for all customers of wargaming no matter on which server they play. Instead Wargaming EU is making it harder and harder for us to get the same things the others get. Hey... if the others would suddenly be treated the same way as us, I'm fine with that as well. At least it would be equal. But different standards based on location only is nothing but discrimination. Something most modern societies have laws against but for online communities it is apparently to much to ask to be treated by the same standards. And just so you know... I could at any time buy a T-9 ship and unlock more with FreeXP. I don't want to. I said so plenty of times over the past months. I just don't like the gameplay at those tiers into which I get a glimpse while playing T-8. If there would be good reason for keeping the Takao-mission at tier-9 I wouldn't object. But that same reason should then be applied to all other servers. If the EU team can't convince the other servers they should bite the bullet and go along with what those other servers have planned, so that their customer base at large is treated the same way globally. I know... equality is a hard concept to grasp for some. They call those who fight for it entitled, not understanding that those who fight actually fight for them too.

It should better be a good one. Or better yet an adjustment of the missions and an apology.

That doesn't explain why we need a higher tier then the ships themself on various of those missions. We are used to equal tiers for those ships. Nobody would have had a problem with that. No... you had to go the extra mile and make it harder then necessary just because you can. Not to mention that we finally know that our mission requirements are not created for this communities needs, like it has so often proclaimed, but because Wargaming EU beleives we should not get free ships as easy as the rest of the world. Thank you for finally giving us an honest answer on this.

So because you think it is a good ship (I will not deny it) we get screwed over the other servers and the ship is made available only to the exclusive high tier consumers? Are you serious? The mission itself is not a problem. The tier limitation and once again the middle finger for the EU community is. You do this every single time. How about you stop discriminating this community in comparison to RU and US?

An Error Occured: You have reached your quota of positive votes for the day Well... I have to quote you then.

By the way, did you notice that now the ARP captains get a reserve slot but Steven (who gets an announcement on the front page) does not?

Don't worry. For now I'll just not play. I'll wait for the answer to your question that has been collected on the 27th (or if that doesn't get the requested answer, for my question in this specific event posted today). Hopefully we will also get a response in this thread with a very good explanation. But truthfully I only expect another evasive excuse.

You can play them with any port selected. You can change the port by clicking on the little anchor below your player name in the port.

Well... if the trend for Wargaming EU continues to make the tier requirements harder and harder, we will soon reach the point where only T-X will be able to earn free ships. It is a constant upward spiral that I have witnessed in my time here. There is only this one possible end result. Way to go to (not) include the community in your server events. See my post in that thread. If we do not get a good answer this time I'm gone. If words can't transfer the message then actions have to. I'll write a mail to support to delete my account with the exact reason why I want it removed. I will never again advice any other gamer to try out games on the Wargaming EU server. I'll do the opposite. I've listened to that excuse for ten months. I'm fed.

Hey... I am already thinking about doing that in my only unlocked T9 ship, the Kagero. Start a match, set engines to flank speed and then go watch a movie. Obviously that is what Wargaming wants me to do, because I otherwise refuse to play anything beyond T8 and we (at least some of us) repeatedly told wargaming EU that we do not want harder limitations on our missions then the rest of the world. If they don't play fair, why should I?

I guess no Takao for me then. Unless Wargaming allows me to bot in an unskilled Kagero. I refuse to play high tier matches and I see no reason why the requirement bar is constantly raised for the EU. You remember the first ARP mission on EU? Tier IV and V for tier V and VII ships. After that it was equal tier only while other servers remained on that low requirement level. Now we are even above the tier of the ship we are supposed to play. Tier VI for US and RU, tier 9 for us. That is even worse then what I expected. I'm not wargaming EUs willfull masochist puppet. I'll not play along. Yeah it is great that we finally got the missions and it is even a good thing that we can earn a few of the past event ships as well. But even for some of them the requirement was once again raised.

I'm refusing to play tier IX or X. Not my type of gameplay. The previous ARP missions were at least equal tier, but now all mission are with a higher tier then the ship you can earn. While on other servers you could alsways earn them with lower tiers. This is BS of the finest art.

To add to that: There is one thing the ARP ships have in common with premium ships. The ability to freely switch ARP captains between them without the need for retraining. Other then that they are normal ships that can't mount any form of camo. The one they come with can not be removed and does not provide any camo bonus. It is only a difference in looks.

We are dealing with Wargaming EU here. Even if we get a base XP mission, it will most likely be harder and the tier requirements will be higher. For the whole time I am playing this game now it has been exactly this way. Every time we ask them why it is that way, they tell us it is because the missions are created specifically to the interests of the local communities. So it seems they believe we want harder missions. We must be quite the masochists.

Because the WG-EU team seems to have the firm believe that we want harder missions then the rest of the world everytime free ships are involved. I wouldn't bet against anyone who proclaims that we need at least a tier 8 ship to perform this mission. Tomorrow we will know for sure.

A rule against name and shame is not a weird one. It is not strange either. Faking evidence that someone has done something bad is ridiculously easy. You don't want to be on the recieving end of a public campaign to denounce you while you are actually innocent. There are enough people who will hold a grudge against you for the most minor things and then attempt anything to make your life miserable in return. The name and shame rule is not in place to protect the actual offender but to protect everyone else from becoming victims. As those rules are in place for everyone and because us normal users can't confirm or deny those claims with absolute certainty (both screenshots and videos can be faked easily), it is only a side effect that actual guilty people are protected too.

It's really frustrating. You can tell the players right at the begining how to win this mode and they'll do anything to make sure that they'll lose. Let the BBs get into the escort circle first -> DDs rush forward Focus those catapults -> Catapults get completly ignored and melt the team or the Trans Don't fall back -> Some ships intentionally fall back to go kill hunting, ignoring the mission completly

Oh... good! Without my sarcasm detector I am sometimes helpless in online forums. Glad my info proved to be usefull. I'm wishing you the best of luck that you'll get a SC soon. And that I'll get a usefull one sometime.

Is that sarcasm? Sorry, my sarcasm detector broke recently and the new one is locked up in customs.