Egoleter

One day you'll learn that online petitions will not change anything. Just ask yourself: Why should Wargaming bother with an anonymous (you can enter whatever you like as your personal data) petition that can not be tracked back to their players?

In the german forum Crysantos posted a response in that regard. He is thinking of it as a bug (and I have to agree on this assessment). They are investigating it and he will keep us updated if new informations come up.

You need to get ARP Nachi or ARP Takao for the first, or any of the others for a second time.

1) I guess to apply a single post in this thread is enough? 2) That's only fair. 3) Thanks to the two of you (and every one else who is doing giveaways out of their own pocket). This is very generous and very much appreciated.

Well I did. My only T-VIII has been taken away and replaced with "something".

Yes. Never bought premium camos yet I have them available for my IJN-DDs. Until they fix it.

If you are, then this monitoring and reading has no consequences whatsoever. Or you are monitoring and reading the wrong things. You have shown no sign over the past year that you actually intend to change anything. I have to agree. We heard this line way to often.

I didn't spot a single IJN-DD that I want to play with those new stats. As I have been oscillating between DDs and BBs. Wargamings massive nerf to this line has driven me now firmly into the battleship camp. If it was their goal to reduce the number of IJN-DD players they succeded. With that my chance to complete the Nachi Mission also vanished into thin air, as that line was the only one I ever played Tier VIII with. No, I am not satisfied. Torps are worse then other nations, guns are worse, hitpoints are worse (one exception), speed is mostly worse, maneuverability is worse. Yay... some still have a little stealth advantage (as long as they don't do anything else). So what is defining this line now?

Voted not fair. The original camo purchase was for a specific ship with a specific performance. That ship is now replaced by a weaker version and a replacement. Wargaming does not know if a player would have bought a camo for either of them. The fair thing would have been to offer a refund of those doubloons, so that the player can decide for him- or herself if a new camo is acceptable. The catch22 on that solution would be that there wouldn't be a free additional permanent camo.

The last battle of my Fubuki in her original glory. For more then 300 random battles, over 400 battles in total, she has been a trustworthy companion. She will be missed.

Same for me. Just noticed your name on the result screen. I did defend the C cap on our northern flank with toes and nails. Sinking a smoke hiding Fletcher, a Fubuki and then hurting a Montana and a Tirpitz. I guess a lot of those XPs came from the fact that I had to give up on the cap for a few minutes only to recap it later. This is my farewell tour for my Fubuki. 400 enemies sunk during her tour of duty but her glory will end tomorrow.

Looking at the US forum. No, the captains keep their skill just as they were. From the looks of it, there also was a bug that made the premium camos for the IJN-DDs free of costs. There has been a hotfix shortly after to fix this.

Compensation no longe exists since the patch where we have to pay a general service fee no matter how much damage we take. (To lazy to look it up... was it .12?)

It is on the detailed report screen. Just hover over the damage section and you'll see who hit you with which weapon for how much damage. As an example look at my screenshot in this thread: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/67584-fun-with-detonations/

There is no such thing.

Your attempts to twist logic and to justify your own shortcommings are the only epic thing here. The player isn't forcing you to do anything. But Wargaming is punishing you for not caring about your teammate.

Nope. It was supposed to hit this year but seems to be delayed until January.

You surely are one nice guy to have around. Even insulting your victims isn't below your standards. If I should ever see you on my team I'll be sure to be on the other end of the map to leave you enough space to be as egoistical as you like.

Oh... they have to consider you. Read again what I wrote:

It's easiest to not pull the trigger to not endager your allies. You don't have to fire those torps. No one is forcing you. But you are forcing your allies into considering you and your torps as a threat instead of an asset. You are purely egoistic. You want that kill no matter what. If you cared for your team you wouldn't put them in danger.

I am missing any logic or the ability to be a responsible teamplayer in your comments. You fired that torpedos and at that moment you accepted that a teammate might travel into them. You shouldn't force your teammates to evade your fire. (They have enough to do with the enemy shooting at them)

Even if you torped from the other side of the enemy it is still your fault. You torped into the direction of your allies as well in that case. No matter how you twist it: You fired those torps. You are responsible for whatever damage they do.

Sorry, but if the overwhelming majority of the players tell you that torping from the second line is bad, and just you and a few others disagree, the one being clueless might be actually you yourself. You are not a mind reader. You don't know where your allies will sail. Hold your fire until the firing line as actually clear or until you moved into a better position. They are also no mind readers. They can't expect you to torp into a direction they might sail to. Why should they? You didn't tell them before the battle started, that you are a lunatic that might fire torps in their general direction. You fired those torps. You miscalculated. You made the mistake and a teammate died. You are to blame. You are not the victim in those situations.