Jump to content

Triard_3

Players
  • Content Сount

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    1328

About Triard_3

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

57 profile views
  1. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Another 30 seconds of my life wasted, thanks for your constructive input.
  2. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    I appreciate what you say and perhaps my stats are acceptable, however, this doesn't detract that there's an imbalance in Wargaming's favour, which is why I raised this particular issue; the game improves all the time, certainly the playability (though the 'smoke' issue still rages) and I love it. I just find this imbalance distasteful and easily rectified *IF* Wargaming want to but as it seems they're just taking and taking, it's wrong, which is why I raised, as I've said so any of the others intimating that it's my fault aren't seeing the wood for the trees - frustrating indeed but, some people don't want to see so I can't help but ignore their responses as they detract from this issue.
  3. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    If a bot destroyer running parallel to me at 2-3km releases torps at my Battleship, I have nowhere to go; reading other responses here, it seems that this is my fault!... like I said to the other poster, this is illogical and the only beneficiary is wargaming, think 'cash cow' and also, I'm one of thousands of other players that suffer this; it's broken so somebody needs to fix it to make it as near possible a level playing field which at the moment, it's not.
  4. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Illogical!!... If wargaming take, they should give too and that's the imbalance i'm referencing, it's one-sided and needs to be balanced. If there's a reason to take, there has to be a reason to give; where tdo the credits taken go?.. into wargaming coffers no doubt.
  5. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Ah yes, Co-Op I think you mean and predominantly, yes as I don't enjoy random battles so 700+ of my battles have been in Co-Op.
  6. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Apologies but what do you mean by "PvE", please?
  7. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Please re-read my post/comments again.
  8. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Cosseria: The frequency is not the issue, the imbalance is: which is my point.
  9. Triard_3

    Wargaming just take, take and take again :-(

    Klopirat: they should use the same algorithm they use for fining human players! (or, the bot/player responsible should get any XP the guilty party have?).. I don't have the perfect solution (neither do you, clearly) but, there has to be a change, surely? "sunk by bots so often"... ? how are YOU measuring this, given I gave no number or detail other than once is too many (but happens)? There is NO compensation at the moment, there should be some, without doubt! Unless you're extremely experienced/good the risk exists my concern is that there is NOTHING for the victim and whilst you're quick to infer I'm at fault, you're not as quick in accepting that there's CLEARLY an imbalance! You need to look across the piece; how many human players have been penalised for doing something they had absolutely no input into (being rammed whilst stationary by a Bot for example) back into the coffers of wargaming? I know a number of players that are thinking the same, there is CLEARLY an imbalance which needs to be addressed as this take, take take algorithm is unfair and costly across the piece.
  10. When is there going to be a change to the penalties system that takes from players who - predominantly through no fault of their own - receive penalties due to the ineptitude of the Bot's causing damage to allied craft yet, when a Bot sinks me or damages me because they can't steer or avoid me (more than once when I have been stationary!) I receive no compensation at all! I was again sunk by a Bot last week (torpedoes) which prevented me from scoring or participating yet I receive no compensation? You have a mechanism to TAKE from me despite it not being my fault yet, I can be sunk and receive no compensation whatsoever - to me this is an excuse for wargaming to take back that which we have earned and paid for increasing their revenue and decreasing mine/ours. This is a BIG flaw and one that it appears easy to resolve, the only problem is, is that there is no reason for wargaming to do so and you don't want to, I often wonder just how much wargaming TAKE each month across the platform because your game engine is written to make you money and at no time appear to care at all as to the cost to the user as some/many have to buy ships/silver etc. to progress in the way they choose! Please advise when this will be fixed and those loyal to wargaming WoW will start to be treated fairly? Thank you. Alan.
  11. Triard_3

    Disappearing Cruisers (that don't have smoke)

    Can anybody point me to where I can read up on the concealment aspects as most of the above appears to rely on me having considerably more experience and predominantly in code!... lol.. CA = Cruiser?.. BB = Battleship?.. DD = Destroyer?
  12. Triard_3

    Disappearing Cruisers (that don't have smoke)

    What is "Hipper"?... please?
×