Toxoplasmosi

Ok for the sigma, I bet on you, but range of fire? Turrets turning speed? And... wich is more ship speed? I will fall asleep waiting for the ship to arrive at the fighting point, this for a short-medium range (browling) fighting ship is terrible.

Blizzard, non potete fare nulla per ammorbidire un po' questi nerf? State testando le BB con i nuovi parametri? Ho visto i tuoi video ed ho notato che sei uno dei pochi, se non l'unico, che quando testa lo fa veramente per vedere la reazione della nave, senza dare importanza alla vittoria o sconfitta del team. P.S.: non ti sto "incensando", diverse tue affermazioni sui player non le condivido anzi..., ma ho abbastanza "saggezza" da discernere... e quando è giusto è giusto. Nei video test sei bravo accurato e semplice nelle spiegazioni (e rispettoso degli avversari o compagni di team, non come molti altri -non italiani-).

MrConway, I think this nerf is very heavy, in particular the sigma, the range of fire, and the turrets turning speed, and speed: 26.5... 27 knots? Terrible to play. I don't think they will be fun to play. It's a shame, I've been waiting for them for a long time.

Quindi? Tutto quello che abbiamo visto fino ad ora non vale quasi più? Sono diventate veramente dei "cassoni"? Ed io che le aspettavo...

Ah ah ah divertentissimo!!!

Io più che condividere ho bisogno di apprendere. E' occasione questa, se il moderatore consente, di ringraziare pubblicamente @MrConway per la sua condivisione delle ablità Tirpitz. Continuo, pur non avendo nulla da dare o avere da @MrConway, con il ringraziarlo come membro da me apprezzatissimo del WG team per il suo essere sempre "british"!, Per rispondere spesso a domande, per essere il più presente. E per non far mai pesare, quando raramente lo incontro in combattimento, il suo essere top player o essere WG Team. Dialogare, anche se delle volte con idee diverse con @MrConway è per me sempre un piacere! Grazie.

I notice that the thread is pinned again, thanks to whoever did it

I believe you! My suggestion concerns only the name ... KREML? Terrible I think. (LOL!)

STILL NON PINNED... THREAD is going to be lost soon. Suggestion: as already discussed in the thread "Latest Leaks From WG Fest 2018" (now closed) about Russian BB T X KREML (what a name!) most of us asked to change it in Красная звезда (Red star) or Красный октябрь (Red october). @MrConway replyed that we have to bear in mind it is still early days for the tier X ship, as the model is not even ready yet. For this the name might still change and suggested us to wait and see. In WOWS wiki I still see KREML... . I know name is not a problem, for this I wrote in Suggestion thread... ... but WG... I know that you can do BETTER! A little effort? Show us your fantasy! Surprise us!!! Kreml???? History of the name: Kremlin (Russian: Кремль) is the Russian term corresponding to fortress, citadel or castle and refers to several buildings present within those Russian cities that date back to medieval times. This word is usually used to refer to the best known, the Moscow Kremlin or, by metonymy, the state government. So, what has to do this name for a Battleship? What is the connection?

Thanks for answer Allied_Winter. @MrConway can you pin this therad again as it was since 2017?

as the last moderator done 2 years ago... :-)

@Allied_Winter ... if no one pin this thread, then it will be lost! :-((((

...and, can you pin it again? Is it possible? Really is interesting thread this one.

Suggestions thread no longer pinned? It was one of the most interesting thread. And what name is this "Fix issues and changes"? What has to do this name with the Suggestions? I think that loppantorkel is in right... WG... WG... what are you doing? This is one of the most visited and interesting thread! Thanks to TheCinC!

This is not a negligible weakness, isn't it? So it's not so irresistible, a mistake or distraction and it stops playing (it also has very low torpedo defense). After that ... if it can be sinked easily is not so OP or not,? LWM say: GUD-BOTE ... not OP, and I am agree.

Got it, and GC? In which area is it weak? If it has a weak area. Because when I play with GC I don't feel like the "Invincible armada". (thanks for your conversation, we have had many together in the forum and always very polite, thanks again)

So @ColonelPete, GC in T5 excels in everything? Is it the only best ever? I believe that every ship, premium or silver, has its strengths and weaknesses. If I take a citadel with Giulio I lose 50% health. It is a question not a statement.

And is the only one BB T5 like this? What about Kongo for example? 356 mm 4x2 reload 30" as Giulio (320 mm 2 х 2 / 2 х 3 ), speed 30kn (Giulio 27kn) Hull 54.000 (Giulio 45.500)... I am not contesting your opinion but I would like to understand. When I use Giulio, I have to take care because easly I will be sinked if I go around the map in an easy way as a party time.

Seriously, can anyone please explain to me in detail where the GC is OP? AA? Secondary battery? Main battery? Invulnerable citadel? Sigma? Dispersion? Armor? For me it's just a good ship and easy to play. @wilkatis_LV, can you? Please?

same: no compensation available, is not active.

1) because if you pay for a good with value 10 , for example, and the seller tell you that will give you at the same price a good with value 12... wilkatis... this is an advantage for the buyer. Is a marketing rule all over the world! 2) who told you to buy free exp? You can have it for free as well, buy it for have a silver ship is your choice. This is not comparable with buy a premium ship. That's why, wilkatis. Hope is it clear. Regards.

No really do you think that GC is OP? Why? AA... better do not talk about; Secondaries... oh has she a secondaries? RNG... terrible! Dispersion? Meh. Others TV as König: more hull and fast reload and good secondaries; Kongo more hull than German and higer caliber and longer fire range; Iron Duke more hull, higer caliber and is a sniper! What do you want from Giulio? Only becasue she move as a Cruiser? That's all the OP? O come on mate! Well done WG!!!

It mean that if you do this we do that and we want money back. In a short way language it men NO! And not yes as you think.

Excellent decision! Wise decision. Well done. The example: thi is normal because it regarding all ships premium and not. It regarding the whole mechanics, nobody will complain for it.

This is great and wise from WG developers. I really appreciate it. Regarding the example of nerf, if this is done to ALL ships in the same way, as you have already done, it is not a problem for those with premium ships, because it is completely different from the reworking (Tier change) of only ONE premium ship, so nobody will complain it.