Toxoplasmosi

Aragathor, I am surprised that the shop is empty! ( Collectors Club thread? Where are they?)

Hummm... I could perhaps understand this if there were no T VIII or VII in the shop, but there are (T VIII: Kii, LoYang, Atago, Tirpitz; T VII: Hood, Leningrad and Blyskawica) , then this is not worth. Why do these and others do not? Like BB Roma for example? (P.S .: no WG representative in this thread? It does not interest?)

Bah... strange commercial strategy. I would like to buy Roma, but there is no Roma nowhere. A lot of Italians will buy it after saw the BB without that horrible jap camo. And because there is no Roma on sale I am not going to buy Tirpitz instead of that (maybe Tirpitz is much better but I do not care). A lot of italians play this game, yesterday in Random battle we where 6 Italian playng in the two teams (no Divisions). No Italian thech tree and only 1 premium ship available? If I was WG I will make available all the premium. No Roma? No money! (humm... or was that maybe "no Martini? No party!" ? Ah ah ah...)

Vero scusa! Con tutte quelle sigle T-V-Z ecc. dei DD tedeschi mi confondo! Ah ah ah...

Capito; mi sembra giusto. Spero non ci sia ancora molto da aspettare. Quelle elencate da Sael_ in questo annuncio sono uscite: il T-61, l'Aigle e la Musashi; manca solo la nostra Abbruzzi, deduco non ci vorrà molto. Blizzard_, grazie per la tua disponibilità ed opinione sulla "tricolore".

Grazie per il video. Ho visto l'ABBRUZZI ed anche la KRONSHTADT (la linea sovietica mi piace). Deduco che tu sia uno di quelli che testano le navi prima del lancio, la mia domanda infatti è questa: quando sarà disponibile l'ABBRUZZI? *** (Strano che abbiano cambiato il nome. Nella MMI o RM non è mai esistita una nave chiamata "Abbruzzi", è vero che la WG tiene alla storia ma qualche castroneria -chissà perché- la fanno eccome, vedasi anche l'AA 76mm a poppa del Leningrad, non esiste! Anche le foto postate da loro lo dimostrano)

... si ma quando arriva la Duca degli Abbruzzi? Mi serve un buon T VII (uno che mi piaccia), a parte il T VII russo Shchors non ho altre alternative (che mi piacciano).

I try to explain why, (my tought of course): in WOWP (from where I come from for example) version 2.0 has made many aircraft players off. Several of these started playing WOWS (like me). I was a good player wit Fighters... I could make a difference in the game, like many others. But here I am a perfect rookie (as I was years ago in WOWP). Becasuse of this, I perfectly know that flying is completely different from sailing... so I do not pretend to start as a good player here in WOWS. I am not a W.E. player as Mandalorianer said before, (I do not see nothing bad in W.E. Player anyway), WE want to learn, WE accept suggestions from expert players of WOWS as I received from EsaTuunanen, RAMJB... and many others, suggestions I really appreciated and I hope to have more. So Oderisson, be patient and when you find someone doing wrong... please contact him and explain, with time he will became a good player thanks to you and all the others will help. Hope you have an answer now... :-)))))))))))))). Regards.

I dont know Centurion. I know that DD Leningrad class was 6: Leningrad; 1936 Moskva 1937; Kharkov; 1937 Minsk; 1939, Tblisi 1939; Baku 1939. In the WG page leningrad (Historical gallery) there are the photos I posted... one more with this description... you can see well the stern: <<Provision by icebreakers of the ships of the Baltic Fleet to the combat mission; in the foreground - the leader "Leningrad">>

To the developers: Please invert position of AA gun 76mm 81 with the main gun 130mm/50 B-13-IIs at the stern of the Destroyer Leningrad. I can not believe that Russian engeneers where so silly to design something really unuseless. After I have seen many photos of the Leningrad Class Destroyers, noone has something like this. Please... check again the project :-) Thanks guys. Ah one more.. Most Russian Destroyers has the shortest range of torpedos... 4km!!! Example: shorter than the Cruiser Svetlana T IV (5km!) Are you sure that Most of Russian destroyers have a so short range of torpedos? I can not believe it; check also this please.

From WG Leningrad page

If it so in real I am agree with you: is nice they look as a real. Ido not know that's why I ask. The only thing is that the position of that AA is really strange comparing the others Russian Destroyers (Minsk and more for example. Anyway Centurion, thank you very much for your opinion and vote.

To the developers: Please invert position of AA gun 76mm 81 with the main gun 130mm/50 B-13-IIs at the stern of the Destroyer Leningrad. I can not believe that Russian engeneers where so silly to design something really unuseless. From WG Leningrad page: 2 Leningrad DD photos. Description of photo n.3: <<Provision by icebreakers of the ships of the Baltic Fleet to the combat mission; in the foreground - the leader "Leningrad">>

got it! TY!

...by the way, Minsk torpedo: 70knt speed and 15K damage or... 65knt speed ans 17K damage? 5knt more make the torpedoes harder to avoid and 2K damage difference is not too much. I noticed that you are intersted in Russian DD, and... that you all are much more expert than me. Your opinion?

:-) I fly... never sailed. I am a rookie, as I told before, I need to learn. Everybody I really appreciate your suggestions. Thanks to you too EsaTuunanen (Suomalainen?). But my asking is at the beginning: Please invert position of AA gun 76mm 81 with the main gun 130mm/50 B-13-IIs at the stern of the Destroyer Leningrad. But help of you all is better :-) remember me if we meet in fight... gulp!!! Ah ah ah...

Very helpfull Thanks very much

Sorry RAMJB but I am a rookie in WOWS, I come from WOWP because of the version 2.0. Be patient with me and please tell me what do you mean with AFT - DPM - DoT? Anyway I noticed, in my poor experience, that what DESTEBAN says appear real for me, I use only Russian DD and if I play carefully with them and I use the "hit and run" method, I have a nice result. Of course I need the team support fire (not easy to have it.. sic!). Thanks for answer to you too.

I get it. I do not like it but ... you're right. Thanks for the reply, Desteban.

Players, I (and my wife Svetlana) asked to the webmaster to change the name of the Cruiser USSR Светлана (lev. IV) in Svetlana and not Svietlana as it is. In all European language the Cirillic characters of Светлана is translated in Svetlana (without the i after Sv as it is now.) Kindly, Mr Martin Walk (Customer Service Representative) answered me in this way: "... we do not consider this an error or a bug. You can however always ask other players for their opinion. In this case I would like to ask you to open a thread on our forums here. If enough players do complain we might change it." What do you think about it? Would you please help me (and my wife Svetlana) to tell him to change it? We thanks you very much for that :-) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana-class_cruiser https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Светлана_(бронепалубный_крейсер) Regards, Captain-Pilot Toxoplasmosi (Carlo) and my "loved" wife Svetlana.

Спасибо! Светлана, моя жена, здесь и спасибо ей тоже. :-)))

Yes... so... :-) about this particular... in this game, as a game maked only for fun, your opinion for joke is: Svietlana or Svetlana (as my russian wife say?) :-))))))))))))))

wilkatis_LV: thanks for answer. I do not consider this a problem, but a refinement. The details sometimes are pleasing. Life is not only to face "Big problem", even a little flower in a large field contributes to its entire beauty... do not you think so? :-)