RenamedUser_92906789
Players-
Content Сount
5,828 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by RenamedUser_92906789
-
Rng,shooting mechanics and match making
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to exselans67's topic in General Discussion
Brave of you to say that. Are you a WG developer? You always suprise me with your comments. And yes, shells are definitely falling short. More and more.... -
Błyskawica. 6.8 km concealment Is she the worst ...
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Puffin_'s topic in General Discussion
You guys are comapring her to other DDs, which is fair. But also dont forget, that since her release CV rework happened (rocket planes) and also a lot of new cruiser lines were released that pack radar and hydro or even sap. Dont forget that you are facing T9 most of the time ... beasts like Kitakaze, Mogador etc... I agree that she is still a decent ship for its tier, but atm she is only a shadow of her former self, and she being a premium is kinda bitter... a school example of power creep. -
Random map generator and new game mod for it (suggestion)
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to VedranSeaWolf359's topic in General Discussion
You cant compare a 2d strategy map with 3d open world environment... -
Random map generator and new game mod for it (suggestion)
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to VedranSeaWolf359's topic in General Discussion
How about a map designer (editor) for training battles? :) -
OMG WG!! ... What Are You Doing?!!!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to VeteranGamer84's topic in General Discussion
I on the other hand appreciate balancing ships (buffing or nerfing). I just wish the dev team would make more balancing changes sooner ... for under and over performing ships. I can name at least 10 ships that really need some fixing ... yet I don't know what stats exactly are you guys looking into .... because apparently you consider them to be "fine". And they are clearly not. Is Sinop overperforming for example? Certainly ... yet your stats show its fine for its tier.- 109 replies
-
- stalingrad
- radar
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Download Game without torrent
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
Next time try this hack ;) -
Did you just rate DoY higher than Sharny???? Your lack of judgment is disturbing...
-
Reports and "spoilers"?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Northern_Nightowl's topic in General Discussion
Its only visible to you. -
Hey WG, thanks for ranked bronze.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
Cause those are the only ones left :) -
Corrupted assets database
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
I suspect you have something exotic in your pc setup .... but we will never know will we? :) Anyways ... GL ! -
Błyskawica. 6.8 km concealment Is she the worst ...
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Puffin_'s topic in General Discussion
I bought her when she came out. WG advertised her as "can fire from stealth" in the store. Once they removed stealth firing she was left in the dust. After years of complaining wg slightly buffed her, but in the meantime more powerful DDs were released. I still have 60%+ WR in her, but those stats are old. Its how WG balances things... with massive lag (if ever), because they still take those early stats into account... She now is a port queen in my acc... even without a captain (I moved the captain to Halland where now its torp specced). -
Hey WG, thanks for ranked bronze.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Aragathor's topic in General Discussion
I do the same thing. I don't qualify on purpose. Gotta grind Venetto, Kansas and Albemarle :) -
Corrupted assets database
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
Dude lol. First you had download problem, now you have this? :) I Would have gave up already :) -
What will happen to those that will left missing 1 CotS conatiner?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Anthoniusii's topic in General Discussion
You will join us (the ones who dont give a flying crap about kots - people). -
Reports and "spoilers"?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Northern_Nightowl's topic in General Discussion
Improved chat mod. Still the benefits are greater... -
Neutrashimy why the amount of Coal?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Genie_of_the_Lamp's topic in General Discussion
the only minus for me is that its not T10 .... -
[Poll] What method do you use to re-train your captains for another "Silver" ship?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Depends of the cost. For below 100k cmd xp I use cmd xp... for high level cmdr I just use dbls... -
Download Game without torrent
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
Also restart the game center client, so the change comes in effect. -
Download Game without torrent
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
If you buy premium account you also get premium download time :) -
I like to see secondaries do pewpew aswell ... but then you see that they do puny damage and realize that your ship gave up too much for mere fireworks. From my 5 year experience with this game I learned that the tank build is still the way to go. Once I specc out of the deadeye on my Thunderer / Conqueror / Republique / Yamato I am reverting them to tank builds. But there is one ship (captain basically) that will remain secondary specced. And that is the Kurfurst. Why? Because if secondary build exist, I might aswell keep at least one ship specced into it. Plus I can use the captain also on Tirpitz / Sharn, while my Lutjens sits on MVR configured with BB tank build for both. If a secondary ship fully specced into secondaries cannot melt a spotted dd at 10 km rushing you ... well ... you get my point.
-
Define happy, because I have serious doubts regarding your statement. This kind of comments might just give WG an excuse to say secondary builds are totally fine and do not need any further adjustment, because you see here ... people are "happy" with them.
-
[Poll] Did you receive the WG e-mail with Bonus code (= 5 Containers)?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I will call this the DUPLICATE GIFT. -
Ranked starting time CET 11:00
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
Ideas Ideas Ideas .... don't :D -
Ranked starting time CET 11:00
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to totosniperofhell's topic in General Discussion
I asked this before ... no answer from WG. -
So is this the future of not detonating?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Fat_Maniac's topic in General Discussion
Probably. No way one could accumulate that amout of flags (also looking at other flags) in just 511 battles.
