RenamedUser_92906789

I got my duplicate lol.

WG knows from the start that subs will not fit well into the game, yet they gave in because so many potatoes (mostly the ones who dont even understand current game mechanics) demanded them on facebook, youtube and live wg streams. Now we have a 3 year development in subs and the result is some abomination that will either be boring and frustrating to play or play against. Criticism is well justified .. either be that from CCs or from forumites (you would notice that 99% people on forums oppose subs, just like they opposed cvs), yet ignored completely by wg staff. I could not care less what they do to subs ... but mark my word ... they will bring nothing positive to the game. I am sure about that. EDIT: Here is a short clip from venom (when he sill played wows) that sums up the situation pretty good. https://youtu.be/USkBpZVENH4

Must be a hell of a gay site. Doubt if many women would add Wows as a hobby on a dating site... You on the other hand derailed pretty significant off the topic :)

Not really... its the result in investing heavily into secondaries ... imho not worth it.

Well.... I am moaning here for years and the MM surely hasn't changed for me because of that : ) I play ranked to grind some of the newer (mostly crappy lines). First week I'm tilted mostly .. but after I get a chatban I relax a bit. :) My goal is not league progression, but to grind the crappy ships ... so I dont care much.

Dont you enjoy the fireworks? It's a nice eye candy!

Its purely mathematical (statistical) and you can calculate it youself. The main factor is number of battles.

Here, If you have not claimed yet (make sure you login first). https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/14-days-of-premium-account/

Players in queue data is bugged AF. Often you see 1 DD in queue, but when game loads there is 3 per side.... What does "Players in RANGE" mean anyways ... what is the RANGE? Imho it would be best to just delete that whole window.

I didnt know ww2 era subs used electrolysis to create oxigen ... did they? Beaides pressurized hull and oxygen cannisters the most advanced method of replenishing oxigen was using a snorkel ... wasn't it?

This naming is another thing I dont like. Duplicates. Vampire 1, Vampire 2 ... Belfast, Belfast 43 .... hydro, hydrophones .... confusing. I know there is history behind it (refitting), bit cmon ...

HYDROPHONE == HYDRO ACUSTIC SEARCH ??????? @YabbaCoe @TheWarJaC

Can someone explain what does this mean???? "Due to changes in the mechanics of detecting submarines and methods of countering them, the hydrophone has been removed from destroyers."

After readin through the devblog I am pretty sure they are joking. Right?

Ye it's welcome back, here are some goodies to hook you back.... standard.

Excuse me?

Grinding for anything (especially tokens for crappie dd line) is inefficient to say the least. And btw Narai is still the safest and chillled way to farm fxp/coal/credits.

Petro is different than Riga / Moskva / Stalingrad that are "nose in" tankers .... you play it openwater and punish broadsided of cruisers AND battleships.

The real sad problem is that they can do it because of low players count. If there would be enough players in the queues, sync droping would have a very low chance of success....

Aslain pack is 100% safe... just to make everything clear here. The guy puts A LOT of effort into his work... all mods that he includes in his pack are checked.

Maybe its because of your username ... or the insane amount of weeb content... idk, just thinking out loud :)

I said STATS WISE + I explained there is more about it than just plain public dispersion numbers.... but you just keep it up.

You were saying no such thing. You were yapping again with your "Oh how smart I am, y'all cannot read .. mmm I wanna kiss myself" one-liners ... as usual.

Well then... back on topic :) Hit mechanics might not have changed stats wise, but coupled with deaync problem and target lock mechanics it might result in some seriously weird results. On the first glance it might look like a dispersion problem, but imho its more complex, hence thats why we don't get a straight answer form WG. Add RNG on top of that and you have a perfectly viable explanation for your observation ... which is: You just have bad luck mate :)

I think that you are ASSUMING that they tell us (devblog) about every line of code they change :)