RenamedUser_92906789

Consistency. That is the measure. If a line is consistent, then player can adapt to a certain play style. RN CL line is consistent, USN DD line also. Same goes for SV BB line for example or EU DD line... Lines that shift play styles or have a stinker ship at T8,9 are far less enjoyable.

Average skill probably across the team? (approximately). (45% + 45% + 60%) / 3 = 50% (50% * 3 / 3) = 50% Donno, never bothered checking, but it would make sense.

No islands on minimap bug... Ye I reported that one back in 2017.

What is your point with "So you like camping in the back" ? Where did you get that assumption? I really wanna know .... 3 man division ... well ... I was playing solo only, and most 3 man division evaporated in the first minute. If your way of FUN is 2 minute matches where 6 people just potato away .. then sure, be my guest....

You could opt out of radar duration / pyro, and go with top grade gunner. But I prefer my build this way....

If only forum would edit quotes on mobile... but as many things at WG, things remain broken for years... See my next reply....

The whole mode is boring AF. You get: - long MM queues (because god forbid to have 2 BBs or 2 cruisers in the team) - one sided cv matchups (just whyyyy) - realllly potato teams

Whats there to understand? :)

Its look'a'likes a casino made a yard sale ...

Perhaps you play better now then you used to? Revisiting old ships that suit your play style, can be a very pleasant experience. There are some ships that are pretty strong at lower tiers (>10) and with such, can boost your play. Mind the RNG, potato teams and MM ... they exist to drag you down

Add a nice positive signature towards wg and you will be safe forewer

Imdeed. Yet there are still people labeling this as fun and engaging + historically correct (Hood). But in fact its nothing but a dice roll...

You stayed on topic and I complimented :) Guess its against rules to remove positive replies

+ 1

Oh boy, are you ok? You sound like you're kinda not :) And btw, this is a PUUUBLIC forum, so you can't tell me what to do, just like I never told you what to do. We share opinions and we follow the rules. SO, get over your issues of having problems accepting answers and replies, might they be to your likings or not.. or you wont last long on this forums. Do we have a deal "buddy"? Back to topic... If the rewards for the achievements were removed WG should: - remove the achievements themselves - implement a different types of rewards (if signals were unacceptable for them)

We currently have no plans to release USS Black. But if we do, we will do something in the likes of the "Return of the Missouri". Better?

Anyone knows what is this "hole" for?

Yea, nah, nah. I was detonated when hit like this. Hell, I was even detonated, when no shell actually hit me (splashes).

I only wish its legendary module would be reverted to original state.

There has been an extensive test done by LWM couple of years ago. Shooting magazine does not (always) resolve to detonation .. its completely RNG (apparently). Ships detonate when shell / torps hit nowhere near magazine. I've detonated when I was hit on bow .... no ship has a magazine at the bow tip ... none. https://forum.worldofwarships.com/topic/125532-fun-and-engaging-science-part-one/

I never really liked Iowa, so I never got Missouri. As for Musashi, there is one very significant weakness (at least for me). Turret rotation. It prevents me from taking central position...