RenamedUser_92906789
Players-
Content Сount
5,828 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by RenamedUser_92906789
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
Oh fluck me, why didnt I ask this before thanx for clearing it up. Can I ask you for your thoughts on the same question regarding Cleveland? is there a simple chart that lists ships that benefit from IFHE without extended knowledge of armour penetration numbers?- 113 replies
-
- Inertia Fuse for HE Shells
- IFHE
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
What about vs. BBs? Shouldnt HE do more damage with this? Based on this, I thought that IFHE on St. Luis was a great choice:- 113 replies
-
- Inertia Fuse for HE Shells
- IFHE
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Has the "Inertia Fuse for HE Shells" skill made Heavy Cruisers Redundant?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Procrastes's topic in General Discussion
Ok im gonna ask anyways .... how does this skill work for St. Luis?- 113 replies
-
- Inertia Fuse for HE Shells
- IFHE
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
World of Cowards yes i said it.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Goktsu's topic in General Discussion
I give him credit for pointing it out, because It is a big problem in this game (the passiveness). If he sees the problem, probably he will change his play style in the direction he was posting. If it is one less passive player in the game I am happy (OP or anyone reading this). -
World of Cowards yes i said it.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Goktsu's topic in General Discussion
You could be a WoWs shrink. What can you tell about me? So the topic is not valid, because his stats are not fitting for you? Would it be valid if I (or you) wrote it? Give me a break -
Do good players ever have bad days?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Ysterpyp's topic in General Discussion
My friend you answered yourself right there. You are a good player ;) PS: Sometimes the game just trolls you (looking at MM), decreasing your chances of winning even before you actually fire your engines. -
World of Cowards yes i said it.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Goktsu's topic in General Discussion
I have to agree with OP. I have no idea why people are so "scared" in this game. Yesterday we destroyed the enemy team and there was only one of them left. Instead to fight and die gathering some more damage, he fled and hid behind the far island last for the last couple of minutes. We tried to talk to him, to come out and fight as he would have a chance to at least sink one of us, but he ignored us and was hiding in shame for at least 2,3 minutes before the timer ran out. What did he gain? Higher survivability ratio? We won by points anyways. -
World of Cowards yes i said it.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Goktsu's topic in General Discussion
Ive met a CBT in Mutsu the other day, sailing parallel to all 3 cap zones wayyyyy out in the open (with a div buddy). So I said to myself ... this guy needs to be experienced, a CBT .. in Mutsu (new IJN prem to be released) ... so I carefully asked him (when I was already dead while I fought for a cap) why is he allowing enemy to CAP without any real danger. And he replied: "You would be surprised how good the range this ship has". Ok ... we lost the match because of several passive players and he was pretty useless finishing in the bottom (survived the battle). Reported (both) him with pleasure. -
Hello, Since WG is behind this game and the game is very similar to WOWS / WOT / WOP Id like to hear some thoughts on it. Im a big RTW 1 (SPQR MOD) fan and I love WOWS so this game should be my milk and honey. Has anyone played this in closed alpha? Can anyone get some intel when this will go closed beta. Can anyone provide invite / key ???! http://www.polygon.com/2016/11/14/13591128/total-war-arena-wargaming-alliance-partnership regards,
-
So, what are you bringing to ranked?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to MeTaLMooSe's topic in General Discussion
Im bringing shitloads of herbal, cause i feel im gonna need it -
Yea he went off... Its "im sry" to the entire team
-
Instead of making 80% paper branch, they could make premiums at a reasonable prices. If they plan to throw in 10-20 premiums every year (and with the amount of potential ships they could), they better rethink those INSANE prices they demand even for ship clones such as Prinz Eugen. I would buy far MORE ships if the price range would be around 10-20 euros. Instead they try to force them in insane 100eur packages. WG just saying ... make us feel that you are not trying to us rip off, and we will gladly spend money on this VIRTUAL stuff.
-
Pick your favorite (many categories)
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Syrchalis's topic in General Discussion
Enjoyment: Clemson Yes I know, I know ... but the fun of jumping on enemy DDs in smoke in this little boat is so fun. The zigzagging and spamming the torps and watching enemy flee when you start PEW PEW on them is just hilarious. When I am done with enemy DDs I pop smoke and lay constant fire on any enemy ship in range and watch them panic. Carry potential: Kamikaze R. The amount of games where I carried the team with 4+ kills is higher than in any ship. Economic potential: Any premium + premium account + signals I cant really choose ... too dependent of the game I am playing. Achievement potential: Kamikaze R Need I say more? Personal favorite: Blyskawica I just like the ship. The guns, the way they sound, the invisifire ... its all there. I like harassing and this is a perfect bully to do so. Least favorite to face: Good CV. As a DD player a good CV can wreck your day. I dont fear any of the ships as much as I fear a good CV player that has targeted me. -
2 premiums with rediculous matchmaking bias
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Praetorias's topic in General Discussion
We will never know my friend ... we will never know. Its so easy to implement a simple IF .... ;) -
Did you congratulate him on a nice shot?
-
Sick of the game, just bloody fed up with dispersion, RNG, crap teams, bad luck - everything!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
I got plenty of this every day (almost every round). Its so freaking depressing... WG needs to punish this somehow. Im dedicating this song to them all. -
Sick of the game, just bloody fed up with dispersion, RNG, crap teams, bad luck - everything!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
This one is a legend too. -
I have ditched RPF on my Kamikaze R and took adrenaline rush + faster turrets instead. Works far better for me.
-
So, what are you bringing to ranked?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to MeTaLMooSe's topic in General Discussion
Imo this season will be fun. So many brawlers... If people play it right. Also the epicenter is +, since it promotes brawling. -
I accepted that during the weekends WR doesnt matter (oh the revelation). Now on weekends for me WTR is an indicator how I did And I did pretty good, despite that every game I was the bottom tier (-2).
-
Sick of the game, just bloody fed up with dispersion, RNG, crap teams, bad luck - everything!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
-
Sorry man, but I have a hard time figuring out your point Are you FOR or AGAINST it on the Kamikaze. I feel the 4 points should rather go to ADRENALIN RUSH + something else, because most of time I dont even pay attention to the RPF/RDF/RL gui.
-
Sick of the game, just bloody fed up with dispersion, RNG, crap teams, bad luck - everything!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IanH755's topic in General Discussion
Really? Another "stats war" on the horizon? Cmon guys, you can be better than this ... -
Guys whats your thought of running RL ;) on kami? I find it that often i just forget about it, so im thinking of swaping it for something else
-
Fires are 100% reparable. If u get hit by a bb salvo you are a goner. Stop whineing and manage your repair parties correctly.
