RenamedUser_92906789
Players-
Content Сount
5,828 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by RenamedUser_92906789
-
BUG? SMOKE ISSUE? FEATURE?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RaptorWildfire's topic in General Discussion
No need for that guys But lets be honest RaptorWildfire ... you have 3k + games under your belt, yet you come up with some very basic stuff Kinda leaves a question open If you are trolling. -
True. Currently if you are runing out of the signals, your only option to get them (once per day) is to ... detonate. So since when is then sailing around, hoping to get detonated (in order to stock on flags) fun?
-
Experience? I got detonated in so many different scenarios (bow on, stern on, broadside, front part, rear part, angled, water splash near the ship.... you name it !) that i can say that. If it is not random, then my whole ship is made of magazine room. Even LittleWhiteMouse did an extensive testing in depth. Even if you try to shoot the area where magazine is, it does not guarantee you detonation and sometimes missing it completely detonates you. So I am not sure what kinda proof you want from me, on one of the biggest "RNG driven" thing in WoWS. At least now you do not detonate when you have the detonation flags equipped, where in the past I got detonated (I dont lie) with the signal on.
-
Have to disagree. Detonations are ... weird mechanics, since they are too random. You have no chance of minimizing it with game play (like turning, angling ...), and saying equip detonation module, does not ensure me zero detonations. The 30% is still a great margin to get detonated and say ... damn RNG. They should either remove this completely or at least put the -100% in the captain skills. In the worst case scenario, they should sell the signals separately.
-
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
-
I always pack detonation flags. So I said I will try "my luck" without. 2 games ... both times detonated from full hp.
-
Shchors needs a nerf
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Tanya_Degurechaff's topic in General Discussion
-
No this is not World of Batleships !
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Black0rchid's topic in General Discussion
lock inbound... Not constructive. -
We seriously need a SKILL BARRIER for T8+ matches
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IceyJones's topic in General Discussion
-
Could be. Ive heard that on Twitch (I belive it was Notser channel) and people were saying that its not a general buff as many would think. Since I am not on PTS i cant confirm or deny.
-
Yeah, but the citadel armor gets nerfed, so I heard its more of a general USN BB nerf then a buff.
-
I would love to get the ship, but I spend all my FREE XP on the fly
-
We seriously need a SKILL BARRIER for T8+ matches
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to IceyJones's topic in General Discussion
People say its a mission thing and that it will wear off. I start to believe it wont.... I am no GEM of a player, but if I play a game actively (and this is the only game I play), I tend to do my best. Team cooperation, objective focused ... I watch videos, I absorb and learn. Even the ships I do now own, because I always am looking for weak spots to exploit. The current BB meta (yes I know, it extends to all classes, but BBs are so obvious) is playing none of the above. No cooperation, no activity in chat, no objectives ... they just sit at max range and shoot. In the first sign of trouble they flee until the border stops them. And even then, they just slide along the border to infinity... As IceyJones put it ... players (specially BB) are missing BALLS. I dont get it why are they so afraid to tank damage. I love tanking damage in my few BBs that I own. If I play a game without secondaries blasting I feel that I did something wrong. But then again ... the problem are players and not the game. How could WG fix that? Economy? Test? Skill limit? I dont know... -
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
Probably its because BBs are slow and you notice them more ... but I still think that the majority of "bad" players play BBs exclusively, just for the HP point (and big guns) alone. -
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
-
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
As a DD player I should be happy to see many BBs in the game. But I see where this is going and I see how it destroys every single match I play. Some might say, yeeey more torp fodder for me, but you have the same amount of BBs on your side. Just yesterday I had a game where I smoked up my BBs (who overshot the smoke regardless I wrote in chat and clicked the map - and then of course started to flee) capped 2 points, killed 2 DDs and a CL... and then died under heavy fire from multiple ships. Did my share of the objective. It was so sad to see the remaining FULL HP BB players THROW THE GAME AWAY (and my effort with it) within next 5 minutes. THIS IS WHAT GETS ME. Its not that I expect them to do wonders, but at least TRY SOMETHING. Dont just sail into the horizon until the border stops you (full hp) and leave all the caps to the enemy. -
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
How about you find a more original "RN" post that suits your need. Or better, go and be a pain in the A with "WHEN, WHEN, WHEN" moaning. -
Battleship AP damage to destroyers.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to OttoZander's topic in General Discussion
True. Some might say ... no it has always been there... but it has not. The change happened some year ago. Back then you had to load HE to hurt DDs ... now, BBs dont have to switch to HE ever. To be honest ... removing HE from BB would be a good idea ... at least you would not "miss click" the ammo type- 64 replies
-
- Battleship
- AP
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
3 new premium ships this month, with tier 6 MM?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to 22cm's topic in General Discussion
If next ranked will be T6, ppl will buy. For me, the UK dd seems tempting. -
What you did with "The hunt for Bismarck" and why I hate it
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RenamedUser_92906789's topic in General Discussion
Well, it feels even worse than Tirpo flood. Probably since Tirpo costs around 40 euros and this one you get for free. Yea i got pissed... but i think I kept it "civil". I dont rant often, but lately my games are laughable (4x Bismarcks per side, all finishing in the bottom with baseXP < 250). Revolting or being a peasant? or both? -
Ranked - have I missed some news?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to B4zza's topic in General Discussion
Farragut and Cleveland. -
We are looking into ways to reduce the BB population
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Horin728's topic in General Discussion
I would just decrease their range so they have to come closer. -
Elimination Thread 6: Tier VI
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to ulysses_nemo's topic in General Discussion
Independence (1/1/1) : 14New Mexico : 20 - 3 = 17 (slow brick)Cleveland : 26 + 1 = 27 (AA + DE + IFHE ... CV and BB will cry!)Farragut : 25Arizona : 20Shinonome : 20Mutsu : 21Ryūjō (1/2/2) : 17Fusō : 19Aoba : 27Fubuki : 19Graf Spee : 25 Ernst Gaede : 15 Warspite : 14 Leander : 23Molotov : 13 Budyonny : 11Gnevny : 8Dunkerque : 16Anshan : 17Duca d'Aosta : 22Perth : 30 -
Updated Compliment/Report-system, next patch.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to krautjaeger's topic in General Discussion
-
0. Dedicated captains for all ships, except premiums dont have captains. Most are from 10 -15.
