RenamedUser_92906789

Since u no longer play why would you need a button for? Just use the one on ur espresso machine.

AFAIK Atlanta with the strong long range AA got nerfed. Now the short-mid-long range AA no longer overlaps, taking "AA monster" title away from Atlanta.

Hell ... didnt know about this change. Guess I have some cash now :)

I dont get this. Atlanta for example is missing AA mod in slot 3. Now I can purchase AA mod 1 for 500k. Here I lost 500k. Same for Donskoi. Slot 3 empty, AA mod 1 available for 500k, AA mod 2 is available to buy in slot 6 where I have my reload mod. So ... am I missing here an extra slot I am not seeing? Didnt Atlanta have 4 slots even before the patch?

In the mentime im fooling with my Saipan in coop. Feels kinda weak. Specially rockets.

SO it can be baited by the CV player fairly easily... specially since BBs have short action time on the fighter- Yeah.... I mean ... with all the changes ... is it worth to have catapult for AA protection if you used them for spotting torps before

Good point on the catapults spotting torps. But arent catapults stong against cv attacks now (havent played yet)?

Couldn't find a better place for Jutland. And in DD heavy meta it seemed logical to couple him with Kurfurst hydro (along with SI). Might rethink. Did you spec from EL to catapult after CV release?

IDK ... GK with IFHE? Secondary builds on any ship besides Bismarck/Tirpitz or maybe Massa? This GK build worked for me (Jutland captain): http://shipcomrade.com/captcalc/1000000000100010000001010100000119 Its more or less obsolete in the current meta ... idk...

Popping up out of nowhere and get those juicy broadsides.

Im completely lost reading this. Up to now, I knew what ship has GOOD AA and what ship has BAD AA. I didnt bother with numbers ... but looks like I will have to study each and every single ship now. Not only am I despecing all the captains, but I am demounting all my modules too. Then Im taking a break so this clears out.

Yeeeee.... like I said before. I will despec all my captains and wait. CCs gonna have loads of work. All commentaries / builds are obsolete now. I dont have time for "testing"... any of you posting ship builds with results will be much appreciated.

Brilliant WG logic :)

The way I see it, they forced the chage on us for at least a month or two. By then we will 'get used to it" and the feature will just echo in the memories...

There is another thread about historical aspect in the game... Here WG should give superior dmg control party to USA. Would make sense. Soviets? Something else...

What should I vote for? Dont know. Game has a theme. WW2 naval warfare and is doing excellent in that regard ... ALL the artwork (ports, emblems, events, girls, scene is very nice. Even if you forget all the paper ships, the theme feels strong even with all the POI and other (mostly promo events). So I have nothing against historical aspect of the game. When you mention game play and historical aspect together ... then you HAVE to consider, that there are some limits to what makes a good, enjoyable and playable game. Also consider limitations .... because there are ... you can say LOS is problematic, but sometimes things just dont work - or even worse ... break the game.

Cpt skill should be free anyways. All the time. Its the points you grinded, worked for ... and belong to you. You should be able to do with them whatever you want.

Hello, First of, I never used PTS, despite reading some info I am far from "up2date". CVs are coming in 0.8.0 and I am curious on how the game evolves. I spend many many hours, met really nice people, spent 2 much cash (more than my wife would agree on) to not care. Nah, not a goodbye post :) Only few questions? For better reading and the ones liking lists here is one: - will any planes still spot torps? - since meta shift will go cv, more classes will be forced to go AA builds - meaning less hydro (or use catapult/spotter instead of radar). * even with 3cvs per game, this looks like a major buff for dds, leaving cruisers and BBs more vulnerable to DD torps (especially long range in case first listitem is true). If cruisers would be able to choose "hydro / aa" and "radar / fighter" this could actually work. Only if ful AA BBs can also choose AA or DD defence in the right values. It all comes down to AA strength, and new CPT skill tree. Since I already forgot half the things I planed to ask typin one finger phone post... just maybe I end with a suggestion. To counter the CV meta on release... for the love of god WG... dont do stupid missions again. Better off just giving all non CV classes +200% on xp earn when release gets live ;) Specially if you intend to release RN CVs as close as 0.8.1.

No I get that. Release is now traditionally accompanied with set of "arsenal missions" or ... whatever this system is called. But its the directives ... lets say ... "kill XY IJN DDs" ... so in the end nobody plays those.

Exactly. This could shift the radar meta. At least outside CBs. Also about BBs... If they specc into AA it should survive far more if not AA specd. The poor AA ones should be able to conpensate with survivability buffs vs CV attacks.

You can buy them, test them in ONE game and refund if you don't like her. Don't take my word for it... but you can do this only once.

I am AMAZED ... by the imagination of the WG marketing team (dont mean you MrConway ... compliment and critique related). Like ... then just do this for every premium ship. One week testing for XY, then XY discount if you buy the ship. + a cherry on the top in case you wondered if any1 likes cherries ... because we all like em. Just dont bring out any more of those "pay now, get later" offers that are conditioned with missions. I really feel like a donkey when I see them.

Little speed and small reload buff would put her back on the map.

You cant get rid of us :)