RenamedUser_92906789
Players-
Content Сount
5,828 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by RenamedUser_92906789
-
Hakuryu the New and Improved Shimakaze of the air???
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Bayla450's topic in General Discussion
TP material righ there. Thnx buddy. Thumbs up and awaaaaaay. -
70 air kills in a Repu...without AA build
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to SEN_SEN_Channel_Portugue's topic in General Discussion
Man... If I run out of toilet paper this weekend Ill just print some "cv rework topics" from the forum. Year long stock. -
CVs are crap now.WG normaly you would owe me 38k dbs
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Grumpy_Shark's topic in General Discussion
They say its still better to practise this than to waste 150 eur only to get OP ship that gets nerfd the next day. PS: I ment Bhull ... doooh :D -
CVs are crap now.WG normaly you would owe me 38k dbs
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Grumpy_Shark's topic in General Discussion
Suddenly that 3k FXP I used to buy the Hosho and Bhole dont seem that expensive anymore :) Gotta take it slow man... just like sex. No rushing :) :) -
Yeah maybe my example was bad .. because in COOP people mostly just yolo-torp the bots, while in CV/BB you actually dont have many chances to devastate them (in CV none, unless they detonate).
-
People care about stats. Why play low influence class that even on "good games" produce average PR? Economy? Some might ... most wont. From my (very limited) CV experience even when all my drops are almost perfect ... I end up somewhere in the middle of the team. (mind coop only, no experience in randoms, but I feel there would be same story).
-
Oh, oh, oh ... I also bought Hosho, but I only played couple of coop games with her :)
-
I havent played a single random game since rework. Played 1 ranked game, couple of Narai games and several coop games in Saipan.
-
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
Sure ...I do agree. Credit boost comes from the camo (permanent or not) coupled with premium time and signals (please correct me if I am wrong). Anshan for example boosts FXP. That is the economical aspect which I do support (to some limit). But radar ... oh man ... I still remember when WG said that no BB will ever have radar. Sure its almost impossible now to take it away. People will riot. WG is the only one to blame here, because they were only thinking about profit at the time. Make an desirable (OP) ship and people will throw cash at them. Sadly they did not care about that at the time and now we have a plan to "balance" the game by nerfing premiums. Hell I even have RL friend that threw cash (what around 80eur) for FXP conversion in the last days of Missouri ... just to get a BB with radar that gives credits even on defeats. -
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
:) Cant argue about Soviet ships. Still some "paper ships" that have all the blueprints can be brought to life only in a computer game. Why not? :) -
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
No need to get cocky ;) I wrote in my previous post: "People always want better ... bigger ... stronger stuff than everyone else. Its in the human nature." And because of that we now have a problem, where WG wants to balance things out. Simple solution. Do not release OP ships. And yes ... WOWs is one of the titles that has many "history" fans ... and people buy ships just for the sake of owning them. Except for KK. That boat sucks big time... apparently so much that WG had to put her in every santa box just to increase her numbers on the servers. -
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
I dont understand your point? You are saying they are buying them only if they are OP? People buy them because they are "fans / collectors / suckers for WW2 naval warfare". Premiums should not suck. They should be comparable to silver ships with some unique trait. Unique + economical bonuses is enough. They dont have to be insanely OP. -
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
Where did I wrote that it should be "just a different variation of an existing ship"? Or a reskinned version of an existing ship? There are TONS of ships that are not in the game (and probably never will be) that WG could bring as a premium / reward ship. Yes. And delete its radar while your at it WG. People always want better ... bigger ... stronger stuff than everyone else. Its in the human nature. I fully support WG nerfing OP ships. Yes there are gonna be some tiers on the forums, some threats, some goodbye messages ... but in the end ... the game will be better and players will be happier. -
Targeted nerf of single premium ship is important precedent and warning finger
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to RAYvenMP's topic in General Discussion
I dont mind if they nerf OP premiums.... I can take a hit if it helps general game balance. BUT .... feels kinda pointless if they say "yes, we are aware of the problem for a log time", yet they are releasing OP premium ships such as Stalingrad in the same time. Kinda hard not to think that its done on purpose. Release OP ships so that people get them, nerf them later and offer a compensation in doubloons, so players eventually spend them on something else. Cmon ... im not stupid. Said many times before. Reward / premium ships should not be OP. They should be UNIQUE. And UNIQUE != OP. -
Lets face it, CVs will "never" work!
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Atankean's topic in General Discussion
Rock, paper, scissors... elephant? -
Since I dont have the time to adapt (play & test all my ships) I will just leave all my captains despecced and I just wont play them. I will only specc one or two ships that I currently play and thats it. I think you should give "free respec weekends" untill the rework is complete.
-
ST. Premium ships and Soviet battleships.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Tuccy's topic in Development Blog
Agreed. Sounds reasonable. -
A case for reducing airspeed of all carrier bomber planes
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Mad_Dog_Dante's topic in General Discussion
Balancing CVs has to make both sides happy. Non-CV players and CV players. All I want at this stage is less RNG in AA and general fixes for OP carriers. I want to be able to know the values ... not some RNG flak DMG. The things I learned in years of playing WOWs regarding AA can be flushed down the toilet at this moment. Also I would like to see return of countdown at the start of the battle before CV can launch its first squad. Currently CV has its planes in the enemy cap within 10-20 seconds... scouting the enemy team even before BBs sailed 1km. We need some "fog of war" ... at least on the beginning of the match. DDs cant even make it half way to the cap without having planes shooting rockets at them. Is that supposed to be a good thing? -
IChase and his new CV tactics.
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to OverPenokio's topic in General Discussion
You know what .... **** this. WG... fix the mess you created... and send me email once you did. You are constantly sending me those surveys that I take time to answer... now you take time and fix this goddamn RNG fiesta that you created with 0.8. Time to read a book or something. -
Is there a way for player to know how he damaged/killed enemy aircraft (i.e. "FLAK" and/or "Continuous damage")?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
:) I dont think that would make it on wgz priority list any time soon. Sounds more like a mod material.- 13 replies
-
Is there a way for player to know how he damaged/killed enemy aircraft (i.e. "FLAK" and/or "Continuous damage")?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Ughhhh... I was afraid of this answer. Hulk sad....- 13 replies
-
The pathetic state of Ranked
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Belly_And_Chest_ToT's topic in General Discussion
Its either... you playing another mode/game... or wanting that 10k players change their playstyle... which is it gonna be? -
Is there a way for player to know how he damaged/killed enemy aircraft (i.e. "FLAK" and/or "Continuous damage")?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Ill sneak my question here... hope u dont mind Leo :) when you commit to an attack run (left mouse click), but realize you overshot... how do I abort the attack (same as letting attack timer run out). I could just drop the load into water, but the attacking squad returns to CV... Am I making any sense?- 13 replies
-
- 1
-
-
Defensive AA.. Does it even do anything now?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Riggerby's topic in General Discussion
Buddy, can you please tell me how AFT is still viable on all those cruisers (DM, Atlanta, Buffalo, Seattle, Hindy, Mino...). Ill be honest, dint have time to test anything yet... -
Defensive AA.. Does it even do anything now?
RenamedUser_92906789 replied to Riggerby's topic in General Discussion
Dont panic. I expect a change in its AA in the near future.
