Jump to content

Shoot_Him_____

Players
  • Content Сount

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    12010
  • Clan

    [GURKA]

About Shoot_Him_____

Recent Profile Visitors

74 profile views
  1. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    In a new class or reduced to balance with other cruisers.
  2. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    noted.
  3. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    I agree it could be in a different class and perhaps restricted to just one per side. FYI: HMS Hood was a battlecruiser and that's classed as a BB in WOWs. Perhaps an oversight on WOWs half. Certainly an oversight with Stalin. It is a strong ship and its not because I'm a rubbish player. I'm not perfect but I have played over 12,000 games to know that Stalin is wrongly classed and shouldn't be allowed in CB until its more balanced with the rest of the ships.
  4. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    Oh your right, I must be rubbish. There will always be a better player.
  5. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    I misunderstood, my apologies.
  6. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    Just thought they would need a lot of games under the belt to be able to give concise, meaningful observations based on a lot of experience. Or I was offended by MaxxyNL for what appears to him, a boring comment. I was wanting to voice my concerns over this OP ship and hoping WOWs will do something about it in the interest of their players/customers. Not marked off as boring.
  7. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    Your a beta tester, but you have only played 8k games.
  8. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    complain about it, because it is totally unfair.
  9. Shoot_Him_____

    Stalingrad OP

    This ship is way overpowered. Everytime we are up against 1-2 in CB they are very difficult to defeat. with 72K hit points it is really a BB more than a cruiser. I have broadsided them in a BB with little effect. WOWs need to either MM with Stalin's on both sides or reduce its abilities. Makes the games very repetitive and quite frankly boring. Who agrees something needs to be done?
  10. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    What do you need to know Jimmy. The facts are straight. I was placed in a team with a clan mate, ON THE SAME TEAM. And we get banned because of it. For rigging the game, but can you example to me how we rigged the game, when we are on the same team?
  11. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    Well that is the problem, we have one WG staff member saying it is an offence and another WG staff member saying it isn't.
  12. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    You are making yourself look really silly now.
  13. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    Google translate dude. Sorry, I didn't realise you think you are better than everyone else. Now it makes sense.
  14. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    I appreciate your sympathy in my situation. I have a feeling this has gone out of control for them, maybe getting inundated with people falsely reporting rigging or whatever reason and they are struggling to cope with it. So the easiest solution is to ban them and be done with it. What they need to be aware of is these players are paying customers who might well have done nothing wrong. To believe in a report by a player who was upset because they lost. And something like this, if not dealt with sensibly, can bring down a company.
  15. Shoot_Him_____

    Unfairly Banned: Contractual Battles

    I can't believe it happened to the nearest second or two. That would be virtually impossible.
×