Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

fumtu

Players
  • Content Сount

    3,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    38979
  • Clan

    [CR33D]

Everything posted by fumtu

  1. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    But you are not. You had Moskva before this and you will have it after this. So one T10 before, one T10 after. I personally don't see any issue that we need to regrind Donskoy again. Question of the camo is far more important than this. I agree it does sound stupid. Again, specific case. It doesn't mean that WG will not apply same practice we had for US Crusiers, Soviet or IJN DDs on future splits, it is just that they consider this a different case and creating a different rules for it. But neither a Cleveland or Pepsi become premium ships, neither of them are T10. Again can you please show me any example of previous splits where T10 tech three ship actually become premium ship?
  2. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    And did any of those US cruisers become a premium ship? Or they just moved around between tiers and branches? Reason why WG did that is because by moving ship down, its perma camo is also moving down and it actually loosing on value. If you remember the first split ever happened was IJN DD split where all ships were actually downtiered. And if someone for example had all perma camos he would loose 5k doubloons during the process and WG decided to compensate this by giving camos for new ships. And WG continue with practice in subsequent splits. But this time ship is staying at T10, its camo is not loosing value. Thing is, you can try to use that example as it fit what you want to happen. On the other hand, as this is a specific case and also first of its kind, WG could do whatever they think that it is best for them. So as much as WG current approach does seems unfair it doesn't make that your reasoning that this should follow previous splits correct, at least technically or in WG eyes. I am not saying that WG should not compensate you but IMO you are continue to stick with argument that could but also as easily could not be applied in this case.
  3. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    Well this is not a WoT, and although WG owns both it doesn't mean that same rules apply on both games.
  4. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    What about it?
  5. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    Policy is that if you buy camo for a ship it stays with ship. Anything else could be changed as WG consider fit. Can you please show me any example of previous splits where T10 tech three ship actually become premium ship and was replaced with other ship? Are you going to loose T10 ship in this move? No, you are not, you will still have T10 Moskva. This time ship will not move to a different branch but in fact change it status. As this is a precedent, WG could use this as a policy for similar cases in future.
  6. fumtu

    Still nothing make up for moskva's permacamo?

    So you are agree that refunding 5k doubloons is not a reasonable solution as you already benefited from it but still you think that WG should instead give you a 5k doubloons worth camo for AL Nevsky AND AL Nevsky itself while the those who didn't bought Moskva camo would need to grind to Donskoy? And you are thinking that would be reasonable?
  7. fumtu

    PT, Balance changes

    It is not a buff, they put wrong values for hydro in first place. These are values it was intended to have to somebody f*up. If you go in Premium Shop and open one of PB bundles you can find this line But ship in the game only got 4km detection for ships.
  8. fumtu

    PT, Balance changes

    Nope, they are just swapping them so that Speed Boost consumable could be on the same slot as on Udaloi and Ognevoi. It will still have both consumables.
  9. fumtu

    PT, Balance changes

    It is not. Currently Ognevoi and Udaloi both have Speed Boost on the same key, like a majority of other DDs, where Grozovoi has DFAA. So actually current slot of Speed Boost on Grozovoi is odd.
  10. Because none would actually regrind lines to get RP do buy LUs, so moving them there while keeping missions would be pointless. "You can get your LU by just playing T10 ship you got or you can research five lines to get access to RB, then you need to regrind one or two more lines to get enough points to get LU. Choice is on you". Sure that would attract lot of players to part with their T10 ships. So if they are going to have LUs in RB, missions needs to go.
  11. fumtu

    Some reason I was barred from posting last night?

    Yup, most likely a forum issue. I couldn't post anything too and there wasn't a single post sometime after 23:00 till morning.
  12. But in that response he never said that they will make alternative way to get LUs only that they are "looking into ways how to address" issue. Even if they do find alternative way, which I wouldn't expect anytime soon , I doubt that they will put it into Premium Store as that would negate complete point of RB.
  13. fumtu

    Mogami 2020

    Mogami kind of profited from all those IFHE and Upgrades changes. With IFHE its 155mm guns can pen 38mm of armour, but also, unlike all other T8 CLs, I'm talking about 155mm version, it has CA armour which means 27mm upper belt and central deck. Removing reload penalty from MBM2 it makes it straight upgrade to 155mm Mogami. Still definitely not easy ships to play but I would not consider it a bad ship. Just require more skill and awareness.
  14. Are you sure about that? I know that WG said that they will try to find other ways for players to earn Research Points, not LUs, and seems like those with RB unlocked will be able to get RPs from daily missions from 0.9.5. But as far as I know they never mentioned that there would be alternative way to get LUs.
  15. fumtu

    Your fav T7 for upcoming ranked?

    My first picks are Jervis and Atlanta, maybe try Fiji, Helena or Surrey.
  16. They didin't took anything from you. All LUs you had already researched you still have, those you have missions for you can finish till 31.12. Only those for which you didn't even get mission now you can get from RB, if you have access for. But if you didn't have those mission than WG could not "took away from you" as you didn't even have it in the first place. I think that WG could reduce requirement for RB to three lines instead of five, but whole concept of RB is intended for long term players and as long as those LUs are sidegrades and not straight upgrade they are not necessary for you to play the game.
  17. fumtu

    Built-in manual secondaries for BBs

    You got carrier right, but battle in question is the Battle of the Eastern Solomons and BB "afire" was USS North Carolina.
  18. fumtu

    points gained from your first soviet containers

    Can understand that containers with 300 are rare but don't understand what is a point having containers with 10, 15 and 25 tokens when even their drop rate is so low. This whole event seems designed that, if you want to get anything above Mikoyan, you need to spend money. If you miss just couple of containers even getting Mikoyan is questionable.
  19. fumtu

    An idea for Duke of York

    DoY aft turret angles are horrible. Sure, let's blame Soviet BBs for everything. From the moment RN BBs are released there were complains about their quite invulnerable citadel. But when WG finally did something about about it now some are complain that WG did that because of Soviet BBs? Sigh There is no chance that WG will ever move DoY to T8. She will stay on T7 and all changes to the ship will happen there. I agree that rising the citadel was huge nerf for a ship and that now she is quite mediocre, not that she was anything special before. But there are still three other ships of KGV class and WG could do better job with HMS Anson for example as T8 BB. But doing all that job for DoY would probably not be to preofitable for them as lot of players already got her for free and even more players already have them. So why waste money on ship they probably consider fine when they can get more money from one of her sisters instead.
  20. There is a German T10 premium carrier, Werner Voss which could be seen using mod that is showing all ships in the game. From Flamu stream It could be some test for different plane loadout for MvR or maybe some future German T10 premium CV?
  21. fumtu

    VIII Tallinn Broken ship.

    It will be released in 0.9.6 so in two patches not in the next one. But of course this is not a reason why would anybody spend money on early access.
  22. fumtu

    Possible Upcoming Coal Ships

    Crysantos just said on other tread that Benham will not return in foreseeable future. So I doubt we will see this ship outside Christmas containers anytime soon if at all. It is not, OP is basically just listing all ships that are confirmed or eventually could be released for Coal. But only Moskva, LD, Neustra, Flint and Black are future Coal ships for sure. It is not.
  23. fumtu

    Possible Upcoming Coal Ships

    WG didn't confirm that Agir would be for Coal as far as I know. Black, Neustra and Flint will arrive in approximately 5 months form now, LD would probably take even longer. If you have Moskva, or you can research it before 0.9.5 you will get it for free.
  24. fumtu

    How many Russian Cruisers?

    Looks spicy but DDs are quite let down and not worth glorious SU lineup. WG it is time to give us a Soviet premium DD that will replace Somers, Halland, Daring and Kleber in competitive gameplay and make them obsolete ll at once.
  25. fumtu

    How many Russian Cruisers?

    On the other hand, neither Moskva or SG could stealth radar so far a DD, new Soviet cruisers are much worse even with short duration radar. There is no counterplay as the moment DD spot, for example, Petro it is already in his radar range so all it need to do to see who is spotting him is to press a button. Sure for 15sec he could hardly kill DD but he can still deal considerable damage to it. So IMO, Soviet CAs radar is much worse then Moskva or SG radar.
×