fumtu

You do understand that HMS Belfast having radar IRL doesn't have anything with her having (or not) the radar in the game? For the game radar is just consumable added to balance and diversity purposes.

Plymouth don't have HE, only AP.

0.5s in this and 1sec in the previous DevBlog changes, so from original 7.5sec to current 6.0sec.

How about no. Soviet DD AP is quite good. Also Italian DDs should have SAP for constancy, not the Soviet ones.

New concealment values Tallinn - 11.4km Riga - 12.05km Petro - 12.4km So 1.5sec reload buff in total so far? From 7.5sec original to 6sec? Hmmm ... not sure how to fell about this, seems like Plymouth could be really strong. What? So to retain smoke + radar combo her DPM will be really bad compared to other CLs at T8. I don't like this change Wait what? Z-44 had RN DD SP pen angles? 26mm is standard for T7, don't expect anything better than that.

I would never trade main gun DPM for better secondaries on CAs. It is still a buff, no matter how minor. If it is really minor that it doesn't have any impact than it is pointless. If its minor but still have impact it would require re-balancing. It is that simple, as you are not talking about buff to specific line or ships but to the whole sub-classes, in this case a CAs and SCs.

And what would you sacrifice for those secondaries? Because if WG is considering current CAs more or less balanced but in acceptable state I doubt they would just buff secondaries while not nefing something else. Personally I wouldn't mind if some CA line or premium has improved secondaries, for example RN CAs or Siegfried, but general buffing secondaries of all CAs? Could be interesting? Sure. Does they need it? Nope.

How can you (re)train captain if he get stuck in the first ship until the game is over?

Because they were set as private profile. Don't make your profile private and it will include your stats in overall ship stats Than don't be surprise that your damage (and stats) are not great. You should learn to use those guns properly, to think and prepare for duels, not just react.

Campaign was doable in coop tho

As much American camos, whatever is it name, as I can. I think I should be able to buy 5 to 6 bundles which means 100 to 120 camos. And they are giving nice bonuses to IMO not a bad deal.

This is not a first time that WG is creating a premium camo for a ship that already has one, just look at amount of Yamato camos. So do you think that WG will still make them if nobody is buying them?

Yes, I forgot about it. But it is basically a copy of the ship we already have in the game with different camo. So I wouldn't count it as a totally "new" premium.

It would be nice as there is a plenty of ships for low tiers but considering how many low tier premiums we got in the last couple of years it is highly unlikely that there will be some any tme soon. Even one or two new premium would be a huuuuuuuge success. So don't have high hopes.

I disagree as there could be an huge issue. For example for high tiers these "conversions" would not be cheep and would cost much more than premium camo. And if WG decide to nerf a ship, do you really believe that people would not complain because I don't. And as I mentioned it is not just nerfs, this practice could have serious impact on future development planning of tech tree ships. There is a lot of things WG could do just for money. They could easily put two more Iowa class ships in the premium story or any of 170+ Fletcher class DDs without any need to allow players to make current Fletcher premium ship. Sorry but using money argument here is pointless. They can add Borg cubes, dinosaurs, ponies, Batman or whatever to the game. Why? For money of course. I think that majority of people would rather see a premium version of Leander in the form of HMS Ajax. And guess what, WG could get a lot of money for it, without making some wacky mechanic that could bite them in the arse latter. So why would they do that again? When you remove money argument there is no reason at all for them to do this. IMO it is completely pointless mechanic. And I agree to what @Jethro_Grey said that it would be much better if they give more premium camo options for the ships.

Because they were not premiums. You do understand there is a difference, right? Yes and no, but it is still just a tech three ship so WG could nerf it whenever they think it is required. It is not the same. For Graf Spee? Definitely not, it was always a premium ship. For Moskva? WG could do that in the better way IMO. Still totally irelevant for your proposal What they did in past? Exactly as it should be, so nothing wrong there Because, first two are premiums the last two are not. BTW WG could always release premium version of North Caroline in the form of USS Washington. So why would they give chance for players to make NC a premium? Absolutely no reason for them to do that. People who prefer KGV over Nelson or DoY could play KGV as much as they want. If they want better economies from it they could always by camo or slap more signals. I don't see any issues there. Why would people not play KGV if they want to play them. It is completely irrelevant do they playing premium or tech tree ship if they are playing it because they are want to play it. You are trying to hide real reason for it behind some stupid argument of people can't playing ship they want just because it is not a premium.

It was already announced that players would be able to get it for free during the next patch.

It is 10 gun salvo. Oklahoma has 2x2 and 2x3 turrets so same amount of guns as Texas or New York just in different arrangement and way slower reload.

Moskva was made a pure premium, it was replaced in tech tree by other ship. You are asking for something completely different, to make a tech tree ship a premium while it is still a tech tree ship. And that could make WG more issues than benefits. As I said one of big problems would be if there is a need to nerf it. Sure WG nerfed premium ships but through general changes, which means everything that "hit" them also hit every other ship, like stealth firing or IFHE changes. It could also have impact on future splits. What if WG decided to move a ship tier up or tier down? Move to the sub branch with different trait? Create a full premium from it? All this could just create issues like compensations or players outcry. Personally I don't see any reason to do something like this especially as there things like are premium camos, economic flags or captain XP.

I understand them completely, just want to check do you understand those changes. Thank you but there is no need for you to teach me a math. I already learned much more than just basics but I would be glad to help you if you don't understand it.

Yes I know all about changes but you didn't tell me how Graf Spee is performing quite differently now than one year ago.

So why not just asking additional bonus on perma camo? That is deep. But than ... what would be a point of premiums if they are working the same? Really? Can you please tell me how is Graf Spee performing quite differently now than one year ago? Please?

So ... no need for making tech tree ship a premium? Oh no ... does it really matter that much? I mean just couple of sentence before you said that you don't have issue with credit just to say now that it bothers you that you are not making even more credits? But it does have impact on the game balance. I mean current T10 premium camo is 5k so making a tech tree ship a premium would cost even more. So now that someone had spent nice amount of money, WG decide to nerf that ship. What should they do with "tech tree premium"? How will person that spent money to convert a tech tree ship to premium react? Basically WG would create a situation where they could not do a right thing and would face backlash no matter what they do. Why would they do that? There is no need for this. It could create more problems while solving absolutely nothing.

So what the ex tech tree will now be? A full premium? A special one? What if, for some reason, WG decide that ships needs nerfing? Will it bother you that they are nerfing your new "premium" at the same time as they nerfing tech tree ship? There can't be two versions of the same ship, with same name but with different stats. Premium camo is just fine and there is plenty of flags with which you can increase your income. If you can't have profit will all this than you should try to improve your gameplay instead. There is no need for such mechanic.