fumtu

How can you say that it is nerfed if you don't know what "was" "original" drop chance for 3x400 coal? Is this just another "using feeling" as strong evidence for statement?

Got only flags and camos from 8 mega containers, but from one of those smallest ones, I got a Lenin (BB not a DD). So not bad at all.

I agree with this, but unfortunately this is the last thing that WG would do as they hate meddling with models. Instead they will just reduce reload or increase detection as this is the easiest thing to do, until spreedshit says it is "balanced". And we end with boring ships like Khaba.

Just because something is T10, it does not mean that is should be represented by its last upgrade. For example, Somers is represented as she was at the start of the war, by the end of the war, she lost one turret and one torpedo bank.

WeVe 1941 from SC

Not really related to Rahmat perma camo but more to ship itself. Maybe it is an old news but only today I noticed that B hull of Rahmat is actually have different turrets. Instead of 5.25"/50 QF Mark I it gets 4.5"/45 QF Mark I, same guns as Ark Royal have as secondaries. These guns were used by two of Dido class cruisers, HMS Scylla and HMS Charybdis, although both had only 4 mounts, not five as Rahmat. (Images from wows-gamer-blog)

If you researched it, you will get it. Doesn't matter if you bought it, sold it, reset line ... If you don't have it in the port you will not get any additional compensations. If you have it you will get 50% of credits required to buy it (basically same amount of credits if you are selling it).

Couple of funny moments but generally a garbage.

It is enough. This article just talking about replacement mechanics if you have ships, things like credit compensation.

Patch notes are talking about replacement mechanics in cases if you already bought ship. If not, and you have it only researched, you will get it after the patch but without any compensation.

Gearing is still a decent DD. Lots of its drawbacks comes from outdated model, making a ship too thick and sitting too high in water. If this is fixed it could make it more comfortable to play.

Tool he used does not include V2. Nevertheless he mentioned it in video.

Even tho I really love Daring, V2 is currently my favorite T10 DD

Only HE, Dido can not improve her AP by captain skills. Thing is 10% of HE doe not mean much without IFHE as most of those shells will shatter due lack of pen. But if you take IFHE and bring HE pen to 27mm, your fire chance falls to just 4% but with new DPM setting fire will not be easy. 8.5sec seems bad considering that for example, Budy has 8 sec reload on its 152mm rails guns or Dallas 9.5sec on ten 6 inch guns or 6sec of Nurnberg 150mm which can pen 38mm or armour. And Dido AP, only better than Nurnber's one, is nothing special to compensate. Dido now just look ... meh. I hope I am wrong.

Yup, looks appropriate for "fine tuning"

I really like this approach with small incremental changes /s

Errrr ... why you need to do that? If you just want to collect a box you can do that in coop without any captain. Only if you want to play it actively until it is replaced then in that case sure it would be nice to have a captain. But in that case you will also advance your captain by playing it, if less than 21 pts, or collect ECXP, if 21pts ... so ... nothing to lose?

Well you are not getting it for "free", you are paying it 5k doubloons. It is just that camo is technically transferred on the new ship. New premiums will get their camo automatically and it does not matter do you have it bought or not. So basically it is the same if you buy camo now for GK or wait to get a Preussen and then buy it, it will cost you the same.

Well .... it is exactly not like that, isn't it. First someone will not spend all those doubloons only on Repulse, but also a Dreadnought and some other praises on the way. And the chance to get Marlborough. And some some steel after that. I mean if that someone doesn't want to play a game to "grind" missions but just want Repulse and doesn't care about other things but then again don't want to play Repulse after he get it to collect anything that else ... than for sure it is not worth it. But then again why would anyone spend money on games he don't want to play in first place. Also, if someone wants Repulse, why not just wait till ships get into the Shop or Armoury at some later date as stand alone item?

Seems like there will be no new FXP ships any time soon or at all.

What does that even mean? Are you suggesting that coal or RB ships should not be competitive? Are ships like Marceau, Salem, Ohio or V2 competitive? There should be no difference is ships available for steel, coal or RP, sure you can expect that they should be good, but anything more than that would just create significant powercreep at T10. You should not need a steel ship to be competitive or else you will just give bigger stick for good players and clans to club anyone less successful in the game.

LU stays with ship, so when Khaba become premium it will kept its LU.

And how strong it should be for steel? Should steel ships overperform other just because they were ... for steel? Also how do you know that it is not good? I don't know how good it is but from what I had chance to see it does not look bad at all.

If it ever return, it will return either in nerfed state or in similar manner as Missouri did (for very limited time and only for money/doubloons).

Using Black scarcity in battles as argument for anything is questionable considering that intention of all this is to make it more present in the game.