Gojuadorai

so now the tradeoff is 15% range and 15% dispersion for 7% acc before its was 20% range and 20% dipsersion for 7% acc and we are supposed to be glad about it? i find sec so little usefull even in the spite i stick with the 7% and btw im pretty mad about the nagato getting reduced secondaries just when i made a 16p secondaries captain for it...

answer: Ship sections like he explained: No they dont, they have no citadel that does not mean they have no sections. you dont need too it already was explained to you. THIS buts it is not the first opic i encountered him where he showed a lack of knowledge about game mechanics and the will to listen to other players.... [edit] theres a funny vid i just cant find where a DD eats 10+ torps? to the bow. maybe someone has the link or where to find it.

wait a while for the stats to normalize there are effects that influence the winrate other than the ships performance. like for exaple ship selection. performance oriented plyer which share a large part with the group of good players select mainly the ship which is perceived "the better ship" and most people stick to habits, even yesterday there was a post about how bad the nca is compared to the amagi clearly inoring the new state of the ship. NCA is "broken as hell" try it and youll see if your aim is good you score 2x and 3x citadells at cruisers at ranges of 18km(if they dont doge ofc) every game with 6! shells. to me thats insane even a fuso doesnt do that and it has 12 shells.

youre right hes wrong but i dont think he will change his mind. izumo would be grat if its shoots werent all over the place its damn near impossible to hit stuf with unless youre point blank. and the american ships are snipers now its, ridicolus how accurate thay now are. (i intended to sell the nca now im keeping it cause its broken as hell)

HI, im making this quick poll to give WG a sentiment overview (and im intrested in the outcome myself) feel free to coment what you did/didnot like about the events. (please try to limit emotions, i know this is a big ask atm) [edit] second question now works and lets you lets you select 2 answers

well if its ridiculus or not depends on how its implemented if it means you get xp when someone had you locked while launching torps but not recieve a hit thats ...LOL if you have torps passing by left and right from the same spread without taking a hit thats fine with me

yes we do play the nagato with it. but why i would do it on a amagi? but who cares about the amagi now the nca is so much better.... yes its horribly inaccurate still the secondaries offer a better upside than 7% that dont make the main guns any less rng heavy. (its one of the ships where i hardly noticed the difference)

for all who came here and havnt cast their vote please do so here: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/53102-events-r-vs-gnb/ [edit] i just accidentally looked and page one of this topic and just have to quote those two gems : havaduck, on 03 May 2016 - 08:11 AM, said: so go collect those Diamonds - and hopefully this time a forum riot is not needed! ..... but you never know; so, if you riot then at least use this thread.

the 12m WAS THE REAL ONE ! the 15 mil was just a placeholder so the event wont finish before today after 12m was reached , because the events are coded the way they shut down when final goal is reached. this was explained here several times. and its why pople are mad abut 10 camos.

really? from 20% to 5%?????

i love the 25% @ negative returns in high tier..... its supposed to be this way get over it!

yeah thats nice too cause i run the dispersion mod on her. but shes parked in port a lot cause she scales so bad on t7 t8 and thats becasue of her range... :-( so while giving her an better setup when shes high tier, it does nothing for her in battles where shes lowtier, so shell sit in port still....

so not for the warspite ?

OOOHHHHHH i didnt thought of that one! this is infact nice! might solve a issue i have with the ship!

well so it hasnt changed a lot. most ships that would like to take this do not need 16% more range.

same here

well me too thats why i did so hope the GNB battles would have the 5% captain xp ( i was pretty sure they will not give the tripple bonus flag to eu ever)

afaik only the imp got pullt the grem doesnt have the "never ever" flag just the "we dont know if" yeah well we would have to see if the shoip would be the same lvl of op. and i get your arguments against op ship and i dont want to make the ship op by default i would only take the risk of beeing so vs another booring prem clone. as for how bad low tier op ships are i dont think they hurt too much. as they arent played the whole time (i have the luck owning a imperator but i play it verry rarely even though its op) and i rarely see them even though a good amount of people have one. the murmansk is arguably op too but it too isnt realy a problem i dont see threads on the forum "OMG murmansk ruining low tier fun". i think the sensitive tiers are 6,7 and 8 there WG should be carefull not to introduce blantly op ships (theres a fading border between good and OP which is hard to define).

i would have rather seen it be slightly worse than a stock mex and put to tier 5. may have resulted in a usn t5 imperator but i dont mind low tier op ships much

@ all the people who dislike the play x kill y missions: be carefull what you bargain for! the kill/play missions can be fullfilled by everyone without any RNG involved! other missions might be way more frustrating and or impossible without luck. you want more missions like get 3250 base xp??? cause IMHO the only problem with say the play mission is that it was too much! 300/month should be enough as top mission.

THE CAKE IS A LIE !

[edit] see 4 posts below...

theres one thing, you should bear in mind. if you do not mannage to reconcile with the player base, this shi*storm will resurface every time another server gets a event percieved bettert than GNB. a sugestion i have thought of that does not force you to give away more stuff but might ease the players mood would be to give them extra diamonds next event based on the ammount they earned this one. like you got 1k this event you start next event with 500, then players might not feel so cheated of their time if the did grind a lot. i dont need to say that event would have to fulfill some criteria like: - no inflated diamond costs - a main prize players want - and so on

@MrConway please confirm youve seen this: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/53102-events-r-vs-gnb/ it contains collected valuable feedback and the poll draws a good picture too.

this @OP yes it was over nerfed