Gojuadorai

you clearly havnt seen the megazao vid.... sry for offtopic

you realize that this was not my sugestion but from WG? please make sure to quote correctly next time

i really somewhat idslike the DW torp idea (initialy i liked it) after thninking over it for a while now. the potential for frustration among players like when we had "torpedo soup" is just too high, atlest the way they want to implement them. if you reduce the detection on those torps (which imho should be reduced), you may not increase dmg and if you want to increase flooding you need to reduce the dmg. also if you wanna reintroduce them as long lances you need to drop the speed. just creating a torp that does everything better against BB's with an increased hit chance will just (even ith the mechaninc is good in the intention) fail because it will frustrate a great deal pf people. every mechanic that leaves little room for counterplay is bad for a game. (like AP bombs vs german BB's)

Hi, just got my flint and dont own an atlanta so i want to know a couple of things from flint/atlanta owners, that already have the ship for a while and are non-potato. so heres the build i plan on runing: Flint cpt. build my questions are: - would i go AFT or IFHE first? - should i drop demo expert in favor of vigilance? - is superintendant needed for 1x smoke charge (AA already unlimited) or is vigilance/BFT better? - how often do i loose ruder steering? -> last satnd mybe more worth than JoAT?

which is basically a gimped tier 8 ship....

because 3€ to start something 6 weeks earlier is not a big deal if its something you want to use....

ive bought 0 if they were like 1/4th the price i'd bought probably a dozen if they were 1/2 the price i'd bought probably 3-5 by now...

Hi, the first try of WG to fix smoke was horrible, the now proposed try is better but still pretty bad. why? mainly because it changes too much to fix verry little. (and even unfix some) that got me thinking how would you get the desired effect of nerfing big ships in smoke by not changing small ones? IMHO the solution is pretty simple and partly already in the game! Radar was designed as a smoke counter so let it be a smoke counter, just change it a little... make the range Radar spots enemies dependant on the ship class you want to spot: old radar spots everything at 10km new radar spots (numbers only for explanation,best numbers need to be found in testing) DD's at 8km (if droped enough you could rise duration of radar) CL at 9km CA at 11km BB's at 15km why would it make sense? well it would make sense because biger targets have a bigger radar signature for the realism aspect. - it would nerf BB's inside and outside of smoke which both is somewhat desireable, - it would use a mechanic already in the game. - it would screw less with current smoke mechanics - you could make radar last longer if you for example made the range on spotting DD's significantly shorter, which would alow for more difrent types of radar that the SN/USN types curently in the game which would boost diversity (maybe even a extreme radar that has 2km on dd's 5km on cls but 20km on BB's and give it to the RN DD line?)

the only issue i have with overmatching is that they do not give each tier (or even each ship) their own general plating which leads to "stupid" breakpoints most noteably at T7/T8 while you can overmatch a Nagato you cant overmatch an amagi , i know they want simplicity but that leads sometimes to issues when getting uptiered... i think there should be a smoother progression like something along the lines: you can overmatch (with the predominant guncalibre) if facing a BB 2 tiers lower but not 1tier lower

1.) its not relevant to know it for BB's and CV (and partly for cruiser) to the meter exactly and for DD'S it was exactly the same. you could even argue that for people who ony play their man clase its the same ammount of values just diffrent from the ones now... 2.) thats way less than the numbers you have to know for the smoke firing since its unique per ship an that one didnt get tossed or unified.... 3.) a bit more complexety would not hurt this game at all if you see in what balancing troble the devs run cause they have not enough screws to play on..... (mostly making new line unique or balancing a line like the usn CA's)

i wonder ehy they kicked the radar change i was a great fan of this one

well the wiered super small dispersion with ****sigma could be either really good or really bad....

Or blue 16" sponsored by pfizer

its way better than the stars and stripes one IMHO

the new camo for the october revolution is hilarious CCCP

Dragon flags seem to come in either 25, 50 or 100 (i had only 25 and 50 stack so far, but some people said they got 100)

its not wiered its their implementation rotation for new nations. (appart from rusian DD's) it has been: CA/CL first BB next DD last that seems to hold true for RN an French (pan asian is an od duck because they probably never get something other than DD) so i would expect italian cruisers "next" (as a new nation)

AFAIK there was never a official word about them coming this year it all was speculation with the given info. also i wouldnt count on it because it seems like Pan Asian DD's are next and with only 4 months and british BB not even live yet i really doubt we see another line release this year assuming they dont surprise squeeze in something before PAN asian DD'S

TBH this is the kind of response i would say is fit to deal with such an issue. compliments to WG finaly having worked out a good response to a sensitive issue. keeep it up

TBH this is the kind of response i would say is fit to deal with such an issue. compliments to WG finaly having worked out a good response to a sensitive issue. keeep it up

...well as the post i would want to make would probably get me atleast a strike im trying to go with this: although i do not follow ICHASE on youtube (i blame him/his review for having bought the indianapolis) and his contend is not as appealing to me as that of other youtubers, i have to say hes got my support in this matter. 1.) asking to go for refund, is totaly legitimate. it was not done to sabotage WG but a honest advice to customers. if CC's may not give brutaly honest advice because they are CC's then nobody has a reason to watch their conted beyond previews. 2.) asking them "to fire someone", is a bit over the line i can see that. BUT in this case its not clear that it was as honest as the advice to go and ask for a refund, it could as easily have been a "figure of speech" to express how incometent the decision made (probably not even made by a single person!!) was. in that sense why not send a letters saying please dont say such things this is a warning blabla... but no they went full nuclear. god atm im just shocked how (again) Wg is able to handle things sooo poorly..... - rushed release after a poorly executed balancing cycle (who would have thought that giong from one extrem setup to another one of them could be balanced wthout further work???) - no definetive statemenst about the GZ (just: its fine l2p well maybe fix it in the future) - poorly made decision about ICHASE - at the worst possible time GG WG you done it again....

anything below 3,3k you dont even need to think about the event ... sry to destroy your hopes...

ROFL

its the könig albert LOL @WG while were at it can you get pidgeon_of_war some personal trainer for WOWS ? that guy needs some serious dose of L2P, first the nelson stream now this.... [edit] WR könig albert 59.60 WR saipan 62.10 both 2 month average EU server from maplesyrup....

i like this topic ... it exposes the potatoes