Shirakami_Kon

Is there any way to test Roma in PTS? Since the dispersion bonus from camos is gone I wonder if it does something for her dispersion or it's just frustrating as ever.

That would also make sense. I agree that 1 skill point makes way more sense for PT than 2 if not added by default. I wonder what was the reasoning for the increase to 2 points for it with the commander rework. Don't remember if they explained any of this when they changed it or they just decided to put random commander skills for a random amount of skill points and call it a day.

I still stand by my opinion that paying credits for purely cosmetic camos you might have liked using is retarded. But anyway... Welcome to World of Rust!

I already answered no back when this topic was started and it's only gotten even worse since then. So hell no.

Happened to me a while ago, but I've been able to get into the game again by now.

Wait, so you have to buy the visual first before being able to buy the bonus? From the devblog I thought it meant that you can buy visual and bonus separatedly. Full price for both, so it's still stupid since right now when you buy a permacamo you get both the visual and the bonus. But from what I understood they said you can for example just buy the bonus and never get the visual and have the bonus on a ship that looks naked because you never bought the visual camo. If you're forced to buy the visual first, so basically forced to pay double for the bonus it's just insane. But not like it would surprise me...

*sigh* Can he go back to banned already and be done with this nonsense?

Can we please not start this again? It's not worth it to try to argue anything with someone that doesn't even know what that is. Just ignore and move on, please... This guy just got a month ban from the forums and came back for more the second it has been lifted. I just hope a mod realizes fast and grants his wish. Permanently this time. With an actual ban to access the forums completely to prevent his next dozen of accounts too if I may suggest so...

Well, to each their own, I guess... Seems like I'll wear all my tech tree ships with no visual camo ever again, which is sad, but it is what it is it seems. I'm personally never ever paying credits for expendable visual camos with no benefit whatsoever. I'm not stupid. I'd be willing to spend credits for visual camos if they were permanent once applied or if I wanted to change it for another permanent one. Something like if there was a new equipment slot like for upgrade modules that's for the purely visual camo to apply. With a credit cost to apply one, but it stays there permanently until you purchase another one to replace it or choose to remove it for whatever reason. But no way for something that will be gone next match.

............. Why?

What I don't get is how they expect us to spend 45k credits every battle for a merely visual camo. They have to be kidding.

While it would be nice I'm seeing the same probability of this changing things as how things changed after the CC walkout or Missouri return. It's WG. It's never gonna happen.

While 100k commander XP is not that exciting it finally got my Halsey to 21 points, so guess I can't complain.

Prinz Eugen's Adler one is the only other one that might have some value maybe that comes to mind. Though it works different from Kobayashi's, the main focus of that one is commander's XP bonus more than credits.

Hm... At first I assumed WG launched the event in Belgium tho it's illegal, but reading the comments of other players from there not having access to the event I'm curious about what happened exactly with OP's case then...

The thing that surprises me is that while there will be some reason as to why this not happening by default (there's always some excuse or another) is that we customers shouldn't have to be the ones thinking "oh, hey, was getting scammed legal in my country? Should I participate in it or not?". While they may be country based and stuff like this may be illegal in some places and legal in others, it's still WG who should keep an eye out and comply to the laws of each place it's trying to sell something. If for example like in the case here in Belgium (and hopefully a lot more EU countries soon) this current event is illegal, players in Belgium shouldn't have to end like OP. The event shouldn't be available at all in the country. That's all.

So not only they scam people, take their money with their gambling to gamble bait, but when a goverment steps into their BS so they have to rollback your account because of their disgusting predatory monetization they just give you... 3 days of premium... And tell you to move on... Ok.

What she needs its better firing angles. If she didn't need to go flat broadside with a "kill me please" neon sign popping out just to do her job of shooting maybe she wouldn't explode spectacularly as often. Add to that that if her (and Mogami's 155s) turret traverse would be treated as that of a cruiser and not of a battleship maybe they would even be fun again.

For the one playing subs in co-op? That they'll never have time to do anything. For the rest of non-submarines in co-op someone just added a submarine between the bots that's more annoying and better than the guy that brought it in.

Honestly, just go play randoms and stay out of co-op. Submarines are all about damage farming, but very slowly, even slower than battleships which are struggling in co-op too already, submarines are the same, just even worse, which wouldn't fit co-op less. And no one is going to care or wait for the "poor" submarine that's just made a bot mirror him being a nuisance in co-op to get it's fun.

I'm not saying it doesn't make any sense. Because it doesn't unless some major weird bug is going on. I'm honestly just commenting what I saw happening and hoping maybe WG bothers to look into it for some bug around and fix it. I'm not gonna even pretend understanding how or why that happened. I just know I saw it happening.

The thing in my case is that I was at only 2 km right in front of this Mainz when I sank it, and only after destroying it I turned to avoid the sinking hull and sail past it, which is why I noticed this 4-5 seconds between the ship being destroyed and it launching torpedos when I moved to its side to sail past. It was basically the time it took me to move right to its side, not the time needed for the torpedos to reach to me that were launched right before sinking.

There's been a few times where I accidentally collided with a teammate with my ship. I started noticing that you get stuck there for minutes, no matter how much maneuvering, reversing or anything you try to do. Is it only me or has this happened to someone else here too? If so did you guys found something that works to actually move away from the other ship quickly? And is it some bug or intended? Because not so long ago I don't remember just maneuvering away from another ship being such a struggle when this happened.

Will try this next time, thanks.

If that was the aim at WG at some point it's long gone. You may laugh a bit, or be completely uninterested about it regardless for understandable reasons seeing where you come from, but at this point Azur Lane, with all their anime girls and all has more nods and references and hilariously respects and it's more accurate to naval history that this game. Only thing it doesn't tell anything about is historical commanders, that's true. But for the way that game works and how it represents how the ships would work against each other and making references to historical details about each ship with it's abilities whenever possible? Beats this game by a mile. Which is utterly sad since in this game you have... well, the ships.