FooFaFie

What are you talking about? WG have done multiple buffs and nerfs to CV's. A recent nerf was the rocket aiming system. You maybe don't agree with the change. But they have done buffs and nerfs to CV's.

Thx for the honor. Hope you can keep your word about that ignore thing. But don't worry you will be forever my own little special-needs guy.

And when they do I'm sure you, or somebody like you, will be crying about it how unfair it is.

What I see is that 6 players of the 16 that freely have chosen to play subs. Probably the maximum that is allowed. So what's the problem OP? The game is all about you and your special needs? If subs aren't popular/strong you hardly will see them in later games. If they are too strong WG will nerf them.

Also I support OP. You shouldn't spend money on this game every opportunity/discount you get. You shouldn't buy every premium they launch. And you shouldn't get every collection WG makes. There's literally no need do it all. And even WG doesn't expect you to do so. And if you do. Just know it isn't normal behavior and you will get emotional when things change.

The ships I play the most are still my ships from the first techtree line. My JPN cruisers that I got in 2015/2016. I still have great fun in them. So that POWERCREEEEP you mention isn't that bad. WG could have easily made a real power creep with each new line and premium. But instead the "pro-players" is whining about new lines not being strong enough.

Who do you think you are? I'm not the whining little girl that's is crying all over the forum about his little game. Over and over again. Get a life.

I don't mind. See no difference between T10 is highest tier or a Tier 11 as highest tier. All that I know tier 8's will see less Tier 10's in battle. Of course Tier 9's would be fucked. If WG keeps things as they are than Tier 9 will see Tier11's in battle.

Here a new shiny article, only 4 days old, about naval games. But again just a thought. Maybe you should give synchronized swimming a try. Maybe you will like it.

Why would I? And why limit yourself to naval games. Try Tarkov. Flambass seems to love it. Maybe you like it too.

worked

If you go Mogami > Ibuki > Zao. Isn't Ibuki the weird one in the list?

You could play another game(-s) if you don't like the direction the game is taking. Just a thought. No drama needed.

I personally don't mind subs if the endresult is less BBs in each battle I would even welcome subs. But sadly it won't. We still will see 5vs5 BBs every battle.

I personally don't mind subs if the endresult is less BBs in each battle I would even welcome subs. But sadly it won't. We still will see 5vs5 BBs every battle.

Did I see the Belfast in that vid? Actions aren't my cup of tea. Not something I want in the game but the effort they have put in the vid and the fact they are doing an action again. Just means that actions are a great succes. At least money making wise and people taking part in it. Myself will ignore it.

It's odd that they send a message to your old telephone number.

You should contact support. And ask to change your email and hope you have done purchases through a bank account / credit card. Of course it's all simpler if you have linked a telephone number to your account.

Tone. But only bought 2 ships. Ise and Tone. But of the 2 the Tone is most fun.

Free XP ships were only invented for people that play the game way to much. And now they have that research bureau thing. No free Xp ships needed anymore.

If WG would give me the chance to change 1 thing about CV's than it would be the fact that it's possible to drop torps from high altitude. Now they come over an island. are still as high as the highest ingame mountain and there go the torps with an as good as vertical fall. Hit the water and than go horizontal toward to the enemy ship. I would love a maximum height ( near the water surface of course) for dropping torps. Above that height the launch should be 100% a failure.

worked

You could solve the problem with respawning. But would you want a respawn game like WT or WOWp?

thx that's better

So that 'Read more' link isn't working for me. Neither on my PC nor on my phone.