FooFaFie

Bitter way of living...do you really think I run around each day thinking about WW Germany and what they did to my family. But if you ask me if I will play Nazi DD's. You know the answer and the reason. And about your own family history. You can do what ever you want. Nothing to do with me as long you are happy.

The Japanese has never hurt my family. The key words are ' my family'. For me it isn't what they did to humanity. It's all about what they did against people I really have loved. And if you regard family (recent history) is a feeble excuse that's your own opinion. Personally I have my family close to my hart even if they are already dead. And what other players do that is for them to decide. The question was about will YOU play German DD's. And not will you play in teams with German DD's. And my answer is still NO. But it seems I should give my apologies to the German fanboys for the fact I value my own family history. In WW-games I always have played US, USSR, France or Japan.

You seem to forget that WW2 wasn't that long ago and that I knew familymembers that suffered under the nazis. So in name of my grandfather and great- grandfather (both I have known) I will not play 1 pixel of nazi memorabilia.

I don't play anything nazi.

BB-players actually think it make no sense that 1/2 of the players on the enemy team have a very small chance to kill them. Just think about fire. And don't get me started on sniper-BB's on your own team. No support for you. But when a Dd comes close to them...

All I really want is a lower CAP on the number BBs possible in a game. Evert time 5 BBs in game gets boring. Same gameplay Evert time. And maybe repair for ALL ships.

isn't the next line a second Japanese destroyer line? After that it will be Germen DD's like T0byJug has pointed out (thx for that ) And after that I personally think of a new US line. And after that it will be Russian BB's.

I also think a hard CAP is 1 of the best solutions. But only max 2 BB? i would go for 3 or maybe even 4. At least this way it's 1 BB less.

1. isn't there a lower CAP on CV's? I see no reason why we couldn't do it for BB's. the stats clearly show that BB-class is most played. Also the devs already pointed out that the numbers BB's played is near problematic. And also in the last email poll of WG one of the questions was if a game is still enjoyably with 5 BB's. Guess what I said. 2. It isn't about less XP but making playing cruisers more attractive. Higher reward could be a way to go I my opinion. 3.I think a tier 6 BB has a good chance it can sink a tier 8 cruiser . But a tier 8 cruiser sinking a Tier 10 BB (without help)? And don't come with the crap about it isn't he role of cruiser to sink a BB. This is a online game where 1 of the objective is to sink the enemy ships. Apparently i'm playing a shooter where i can't kill +/- 1/2 of the other team.And that's normal in a shooter? Harder = yes. But shouldn't be possible? 4. If the BB has repair party there isn't a single reason to not give it to the cruiser, CV and DD. Cv's got nerfed. Fire got nerfed.

See that CAP-thing as an opportunity for BB-captains to improve their game-play.

My high point has been 5 Christmas camos. So that should tell you something.

Last night I had a couple of matches were I was the ONLY cruiser in my team. I would love to have a couple of matches where the cruisers out number the BB's. But not a single game gave me that luxury. Like I said last week I had a poll of WG asking if 5 BB's isn't to much BB's in 1 game. So at least WG is thinking about a smaller CAP on the numbers of BB's in 1 game. So i'm really hoping this hard CAP can happen in the near future.

What I want are 4 things: 1/ a hard cap on the numbers of BB's in each team. 5 is to much. 3 should be the best number. Last week I had a internetpoll of WG just asking about this: "Limiting the number of BB's in 1 game". 2/ higher reward for playing cruisers. more XP and more money for playing a cruiser. At least x1,5 the reward that a BB gets. 3/ No more games with BB's that are 2 classes above my puny cruiser. +1 class is more than enough. 4/ and all cruisers should get 'repair party'. (And if it was me also all DD's).

Will we ever see the ARP Takao on the EU server? Now that we have the containers-system. Or did I miss it. I don't see it in the stats. I see it between the Russian and the Asia stats.

Like already said. If you look at the RU server the Takao is massively popular in ranked battle. It's seems to be the most played ship in Ranked battle. So it should be a good ship. I'm just asking because i'm thinking of getting the Atago. But if there is still a possibility of grinding for a free ship. I would go for that option. Even on sale it's still to much money for a pixel ship. In my opinion.

Let see. With the overflow of BB' in current games. There are less cruisers and destroyers in the game. So that is the first problem. Form the 2 targets that you name. Cruisers and destroyers. Cruisers will be be the first target of the battleships. Most of the cruisers (i say cruisers but most of the time it's 1 or 2 cruisers) die quick with 1 or 2 salvos of the BB's. So most of the time you don't have to hunt a cruisers. Destroyers? Maybe 2 or 3. At best. But first you have to find them. So what to do with the rest of the 20 min, The only thing that rest is firing at BB's. So please stop with the crap of hunting cruisers (and destroyers) if there are none to hunt down.

If you look at the stats of all Tier 7 ships. The Saipan is the second best ship for getting XP. Only bested by the Flint and her captains (and I think for the Flint the factor owners is a big one for the very good numbers for that ship). In damage she's the 3th best. In K/D she's the best by far. I really don't know on what grounds people can even think/say she's a bad ship.

A fun ship would be the light cruiser Lamotte-Piquet. Was in the Battle of Ko Chang that the Frensh won. So that is something. It would be a nice Tier 5. Displacement: 7,249 tons (standard) 9350 tons (full load) Length: 181.30 m (594 ft 10 in) overall Beam: 17.50 m (57 ft 5 in) Draught: 6.14 m (20 ft 2 in), 6.30 m (20 ft 8 in) full load Propulsion: 4-shaft Parsons single-reduction geared turbines; 8 Guyot boilers; 102,000 shp (76,000 kW) Speed: 33 knots (61 km/h) Range: 3,000 nautical miles (6,000 km) at 15 knots (28 km/h) Complement: 27 officers, 551 sailors Armament: 8 × 155 mm (6.1 in) guns (4 × 2) 4 × 75 mm (3 in) anti-aircraft guns (4 × 1) 12 × 550 mm (22 in) torpedo tubes (4 × 3) Armour: Deck: 20 mm (0.79 in) Magazine box: 30 mm (1.2 in) Turrets and conning tower: 30 mm (1.2 in) Aircraft carried: 2 Gourdou-Leseurre GL-812, later GL-832 1 catapult

I really like this change. In my book it's a keeper.

Limit the number of BB in 1 game.Those powerguns are overrunning the other ships like cruisers. Yesterday I had a team in "random" with 2 DD's , 1 Cruiser (on top of that I was a VIII with tier X BB's). And the rest were all BB. It's getting ridiculous. Why balancing ships if you let the massive BB groups exist. There shouldn't be more than 2 BB (maybe 3) in 1 group just like CV's.

It more likely you simply can't handle the fact that a lot of people don't like the game. If it's a part of the game, like the camera, or the total package. Personally I like the game because it's low and in general the ships can take a punch. Even the weaker ships. Personally I didn't like WOT. The only difference between me and OP I didn't open a threat about it.

Let see. The OP has 82 games in random and 43 games in Co-op. That's 125 games in total. If each game takes 15 minutes. That's 1875 minutes of game play. That's +/- 31 hours playing the game. How meany hours would you make people play a game that they don't like? 100 hours? A 1000 hours? Are you really that sadistic? That's without including some extra profiles he/she may have.

Nobody cares about being pink anymore. Being pink has had a huge devaluation. Turning pink today simply doesn't justify open a threat about it. It means nothing anymore.

Personally i would buy ships that bring something new to the game in the first place. Other people would stick with OP ships. But for me it's having other characteristic than the free ships. But again they aren't in the first place OP. The Atlanta. It's such an unique ship to play. A lot of people don't like it because they look at it as weak The Kutuzov. Not a bad cruiser. But not OP. But it's my only cruiser with smoke. The Ishizuchi. The battleship that you have to play like a cruiser. The Blyskawica...Euuuhhh... Not in the shop at the moment but the only polish ship...Is OP like hell...worth the wait

There is a big difference between modeling a tank and a complete warship. And than you still have to consider that upgrading ships is actually making 2 or more model under 1 shipname. They already said it takes 3 to 7 months to do a ship. How many days for a tank? 7 days? 14 days? 21 days?