FooFaFie

I wonder what happened more during WW2: A destroyer sinking a BB Or A destroyer sinking a submarine.

That ship is OP as hell. Don't know what WG was thinking. Where is the outrage now from this community?

It seems WG is playing power creeps from now on. If you look at the RN BBs that's the only conclusion that there is.

Why people use old info of 2 years ago... I don't know... Here it's from Q&A Gamecom 2017

I'm with OP. The game needs subs bad.The current meta is to limited to give all the nations some sort of specialty. The last thing WG have said about submarines that they are looking into it. But that it was boring to play. But if 1 submarine is boring. Than give a fleet of submarines to play And if the solution lays with AI submarines. At least it would give the possibility of ships being bad or good against submarines. But this game needs submarines quick!!!

It's a little bit sad. In the early years BBs where known for a good aspect. But they where also known for at least 1 bad aspect. Low max speed. Slow guns.... It seems that '1 bad aspect' was already lost +/- with the german BBs. But it seems it's totally lost with the RN BBs. I haven't read a single bad aspect

is it this update that Albert will be removed?

Are people really buying all those French camo's? Weird.

Radar doesn't make ships visible in smoke. All that you get is a blimp on the radar screen. For the rest I don't have a problem with radar expect that island interaction...But for the rest?...it's a game.

It's sad that nobody wants difficult ship to play in this game. I just hope that Wg still will sell ships with a corner off. Still not that happy with what they did with the IShizuki.

Thx for the kind words. Your comment says more about you. Than about me.

Personally I see no reason why there shouldn't be a BB that require three times more effort to play. See it as a challenge. All that I ask that the free ships aren't harder to play that the best money ship. And if a hear god-like-torpds on a €50 ship? That I call broken.

lol...if something of the ship would have been broken the other way around and gave the ship a huge advantage this threat wouldn't have reached page 2.

Personally I'm happy that WG didn't release a €50 P2W ship again. When the Enterprise WG released a ship that was nothing more than a power creep and made the game just a little bit more P2W...Uproar of the forum community? Zero. It is even worse. in this threat they even glorify the ship. WG release a ship that is just harder to play and isn't authomatic P2W? Uproar from all the P2W-babbies Even a look at the stats the ship isn't even doing that bad. Worse than the Shokaku. But just a little better than the Lexington. And if that AP-drop delay isn't foreseen by the WG? You just know that they will fix it after a time. I'm happy that those godlike torps (called by Notser) aren't in the game. It was a good call from WG in my eyes.

No joke. I actually wanted the French BB's. This somehow sucks for me.

Atago: 5+1 = 6Kutuzov: 53-3 = 50 The Atago has a much better torp angle.

Like it's hard to see that 406mm is bigger than 127mm. Looking at the imperial system you can only be relieved that the British didn't invent the numbers. Who knows which weird system we would end with. But it would surely not be 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,...

WG said they would fix that BBs can't fire undetected from smoke. Is that something that they fixed?

Kerosene based paint. But in all seriousness. Quick turning ships with slow turning turrets + high health numbers.

There isn't a line in the list that I wouldn't like. But let the nations that been there forever to be complete: So that's for me: - Russian BBs - RN BBs - RN CVs (just need new CVs in the game) - (And my backup are the RN DDs)

If it was easy. I know some profiles that I would love to have. By the way your problem doesn't lay with WOWs but with google it seems. I have to say it sounds strange that Google can't help you. Don't say it isn't true, but it sounds just bizar.

Thx for the info. It seems I'm going for 20 to 60 camo's. That ship or everything else is as good out of range for me.

Give each cruiser-captain a doubloon for each match they win and your teams will be filled with all kinds of cruisers. More realistic alternative. Just give more XP and credits for each time you win a battle in a cruiser. Like 50% more compared to a BB. Again each team will be filled with cruisers.

Is this true? That's 21 days. That makes 27 battles a day. Let say a game is in general 14 minutes long. That's 378 minutes playing each day. That's more than 6 hours game play each day. That can't be right?