-
Content Сount
5,744 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
32717 -
Clan
[SCRUB]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by lup3s
-
Other Gamemode General Discussions: Ranked, Brawls, Asymmetric Battles, Operations etc...
lup3s replied to EireannGamingNetwork's topic in General Discussion
But you have to realise that - most of the time - the enemy team also has bad players. Of course there can be a difference in "how bad" they are, but in the end the only real difference between the enemy team and your team is YOU. Like I said before, try to find how you can have more impact yourself. Focusing on others' (atrocious) gameplay doesn't do much but cause frustration / depression. -
You killed a DD with homing torps without pinging it ?!?!! HERESY
-
And you clearly need good ships to perform well - nothing wrong with that, being that you keep claiming this : Of course a T8 ship should perform better than a T6 ship; that doesn't mean the T6 ships are a burden in Ops. The real burden in Ops are : - players who have no clue (be it about Ops in general, the specific Op in question, or about the game in general) - players who think they are good but only play a handful of ships, yet think they are in a position to lecture other players on what ships to (not) play Combine this with the bots being stronger when there are more T8 ships, then you could say that bad players in T8 ships are a far bigger burden in Ops than a good player in a T6 ship.
-
It's not because you can't make them work that others can't. Of course a strong ship like Massa will get you better results - clearly you need it.
-
> all T6 ships are bad in Ops > shows screenshots of one of the most OP ships for Ops, Massachussetts Great argument
-
can't wait to see all those ships with ship-launched DCs reverse into a minefield to clear it
-
Where is this game going in the near future? What about the competitive scene?
lup3s replied to arquata2019_'s topic in General Discussion
1) as long as a steady income persists for WG (i.e. they don't kill the servers) 2) probably 3) bad ... the less I think about it the better -
Tbh that describes like 90% of the playerbase, if you see them play.
-
Other Gamemode General Discussions: Ranked, Brawls, Asymmetric Battles, Operations etc...
lup3s replied to EireannGamingNetwork's topic in General Discussion
focus less on others and focus more on yourself you can't improve random potatoes but you can improve yourself -
the MineMaker ? or the MatchMiner ?
-
Looks like someone found some oil.
-
hahaha minesgobrrrrrrrt
-
Bug or feature - killed after win announced
lup3s replied to hesar1975's topic in General Discussion
He also gets a lot of stuff wrong - despite playing / streaming this game for a living - so I would take it with a pinch of salt tbh. -
Bug or feature - killed after win announced
lup3s replied to hesar1975's topic in General Discussion
Source ? First time I hear about this. -
^ basically this Very often I ALT-TAB while the game is loading - usually to set the music or check Discord. Like @TSD_87, I also go back to the game once the icon starts flashing; depending on the game mode I may ALT-TAB back again until the icon starts flashing. I have never received such a penalty for this. My internet connection at home tends to be wonky from time to time, causing me to disconnect from the WG servers; even this "idle time" of a couple minutes doesn't result in a penalty for inactivity ... In fact, the only time I recall receiving a penalty for inactivity was when my internet connection at home died completely and I couldn't log in back in time (took more than 10 minutes to resolve the connection issue) - but even then I didn't turn pink, just the "zero rewards"-penalty. If someone says that he / she turned pink because of this, I think it must be an indication that it happens more than once. (or maybe the player was reported for AFK / Inactivity in battle ?)
-
Replay or it didn't happen.
-
Other Gamemode General Discussions: Ranked, Brawls, Asymmetric Battles, Operations etc...
lup3s replied to EireannGamingNetwork's topic in General Discussion
Welcome to """brawls""". -
I would like to see that replay tbh. You had no disconnects nor prolonged "alt-tabs" in that battle, yet you still got the penalty for being inactive ? I want to believe you but I find it hard to ...
-
Complainers hate this man for this one simple trick
-
Bug or feature - killed after win announced
lup3s replied to hesar1975's topic in General Discussion
Reading is hard. -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
lup3s replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Bots can't deal with Yolo Emilio -
By not playing the game. That will teach those submariners a lesson !
-
What ships do you play in Asymmetric Battles other than BBs?
lup3s replied to CaravellaCaravan's topic in General Discussion
- i don't suffer in a cruiser - i have influence in the battle - ez mode is boring af The only problem with this mode is that - contrary to what WG stated - there is no "mix of bot teams"; it's nearly always 10 BBs on the bot team. -
Some weird citadel hit with my wooster (on conq!)
lup3s replied to TSD_87's topic in General Discussion
I should look for the screenshot but iirc it was an HE citadel with a Friesland on a S. Soyuz (in Coop). :edit: There you go. :) https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/151860-he-citadel-hit-with-friesland-on-sov-soyuz/ -
What ships do you play in Asymmetric Battles other than BBs?
lup3s replied to CaravellaCaravan's topic in General Discussion
Depends on the missions. First I needed potential damage so I played 3 games with Cruisers (Salem and Napoli); over 2M potential each game. Then I needed 100k damage by fires or floodings, so I played 1 game with Gearing and got 108k. I don't really get why (before) so many missions had the Ops mode excluded, but ABs now is perfectly fine and super easy to do the missions in (probably even easier than in Ops). GG WG
