Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

lup3s

Players
  • Content Сount

    5,744
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    32717
  • Clan

    [SCRUB]

Everything posted by lup3s

  1. But you have to realise that - most of the time - the enemy team also has bad players. Of course there can be a difference in "how bad" they are, but in the end the only real difference between the enemy team and your team is YOU. Like I said before, try to find how you can have more impact yourself. Focusing on others' (atrocious) gameplay doesn't do much but cause frustration / depression.
  2. lup3s

    General Submarines related discussions

    You killed a DD with homing torps without pinging it ?!?!! HERESY
  3. lup3s

    Let us block one Operation

    And you clearly need good ships to perform well - nothing wrong with that, being that you keep claiming this : Of course a T8 ship should perform better than a T6 ship; that doesn't mean the T6 ships are a burden in Ops. The real burden in Ops are : - players who have no clue (be it about Ops in general, the specific Op in question, or about the game in general) - players who think they are good but only play a handful of ships, yet think they are in a position to lecture other players on what ships to (not) play Combine this with the bots being stronger when there are more T8 ships, then you could say that bad players in T8 ships are a far bigger burden in Ops than a good player in a T6 ship.
  4. lup3s

    Let us block one Operation

    It's not because you can't make them work that others can't. Of course a strong ship like Massa will get you better results - clearly you need it.
  5. lup3s

    Let us block one Operation

    > all T6 ships are bad in Ops > shows screenshots of one of the most OP ships for Ops, Massachussetts Great argument
  6. lup3s

    The glorious idea of mine fields...

    can't wait to see all those ships with ship-launched DCs reverse into a minefield to clear it
  7. 1) as long as a steady income persists for WG (i.e. they don't kill the servers) 2) probably 3) bad ... the less I think about it the better
  8. lup3s

    Name one thing

    Tbh that describes like 90% of the playerbase, if you see them play.
  9. focus less on others and focus more on yourself you can't improve random potatoes but you can improve yourself
  10. lup3s

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    the MineMaker ? or the MatchMiner ?
  11. lup3s

    General CV related discussions.

    Looks like someone found some oil.
  12. lup3s

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    hahaha minesgobrrrrrrrt
  13. He also gets a lot of stuff wrong - despite playing / streaming this game for a living - so I would take it with a pinch of salt tbh.
  14. Source ? First time I hear about this.
  15. lup3s

    Abuse of reporting bad/inactive Players

    ^ basically this Very often I ALT-TAB while the game is loading - usually to set the music or check Discord. Like @TSD_87, I also go back to the game once the icon starts flashing; depending on the game mode I may ALT-TAB back again until the icon starts flashing. I have never received such a penalty for this. My internet connection at home tends to be wonky from time to time, causing me to disconnect from the WG servers; even this "idle time" of a couple minutes doesn't result in a penalty for inactivity ... In fact, the only time I recall receiving a penalty for inactivity was when my internet connection at home died completely and I couldn't log in back in time (took more than 10 minutes to resolve the connection issue) - but even then I didn't turn pink, just the "zero rewards"-penalty. If someone says that he / she turned pink because of this, I think it must be an indication that it happens more than once. (or maybe the player was reported for AFK / Inactivity in battle ?)
  16. lup3s

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Replay or it didn't happen.
  17. lup3s

    Abuse of reporting bad/inactive Players

    I would like to see that replay tbh. You had no disconnects nor prolonged "alt-tabs" in that battle, yet you still got the penalty for being inactive ? I want to believe you but I find it hard to ...
  18. lup3s

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Complainers hate this man for this one simple trick
  19. Reading is hard.
  20. Bots can't deal with Yolo Emilio
  21. lup3s

    General Submarines related discussions

    By not playing the game. That will teach those submariners a lesson !
  22. - i don't suffer in a cruiser - i have influence in the battle - ez mode is boring af The only problem with this mode is that - contrary to what WG stated - there is no "mix of bot teams"; it's nearly always 10 BBs on the bot team.
  23. I should look for the screenshot but iirc it was an HE citadel with a Friesland on a S. Soyuz (in Coop). :edit: There you go. :) https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/151860-he-citadel-hit-with-friesland-on-sov-soyuz/
  24. Depends on the missions. First I needed potential damage so I played 3 games with Cruisers (Salem and Napoli); over 2M potential each game. Then I needed 100k damage by fires or floodings, so I played 1 game with Gearing and got 108k. I don't really get why (before) so many missions had the Ops mode excluded, but ABs now is perfectly fine and super easy to do the missions in (probably even easier than in Ops). GG WG
×