lup3s

"LET NUMBERS SPEAK" Shimakaze's 20km torpedoes haver a higher rating than its 12km and 8km torpedoes. (so they must be better ... right? ) Why would you need that much gun range?

Edited This post has been edited by the moderation team due to inappropriate remarks.

Tfw you realise most of these boxes are already ticked off

~30 battles played (I don't have a lot of time) and currently at 135 coins.

Where can you see this?

I met FallenOrchid tonight in his Ognevoi, I was sailing my Ranger. It was quite an easy victory

I don't think I'll get the 800 coins for the Kamikaze -> I don't play enough

Had been a while since I played this ship. I still like her. Casual 410k+ credits profit (w/o mission)

Imo the Shira is so much better suited for Ranked than the Akatsuki.. But must be me I guess

The biggest issue with the removal of manual attacks is (in my opinion) that one of the stated reasons to do so, is the bad AA at T4-T5. In my opinion and experience, there are some ships with decent AA at those tiers, and your plane reserves are so low that you want to assure hitting them as hard as possible (i.e. manual attack). T4: Kaiser, Wyoming and Myogi all have decent AA. T5: Texas and Konig have strong AA. New York and Kongo should not be underestimated. Kirov and Omaha should also not be underestimated. With manual attacks removed you'll still lose planes, but you won't be able to hit them as hard (or at all, unless you cross-drop). Imo it's an indirect buff to some other ships whose weakness were CVs/planes, i.e. some DDs (especially the -old- Minekaze clones) and the Imperator Nikolai and Arkansas Beta. Those ships didn't need another buff as they already were (too) strong.

Most played DD -> Akatsuki ... ?

This one might indeed be an exception, as its secondary armament seem far more useful / deadly than its main armament I should try it out then. But I do like CE on my NC (and on my Izumo I don't have a 19-point Commander yet )

Akizuki: 7 - 3 = 4Benson: 36Lo Yang (Mk. 15 mod. 0): 14Atago: 36 Chapayev: 11Mikhail Kutuzov: 39 + 1 = 40Amagi: 4North Carolina: 24Tirpitz: 16Bismarck: 13Shokaku (2/2/2): 26

stick with other ships? (preferably T9s)

* if played correctly Too many times I saw players completely waste the potential of the Belfast.

True, but still quite easy to calculate imo... I didn't use that mod btw, didn't need it. I guess my 'mental arithmetic' is good enough.

And another feature to cater the potatoes. Is it really that hard for people to use their brains?

I fear so... At least havaduck isn't trying to kill me (I think)

I'm in Austria right now

Kaiser? Wyoming? Myogi? (all with upgraded hull of course) Each of them has enough AA to shoot down some planes. And due to low reserves in T4 CVs, you could have a good trade between damage taken and planes shot down. But too bad AA is also so RNG-dependent... E.g. had a battle not too long ago, when I attacked the same Kaiser twice (as he was horribly out of position and sailing alone). The first wave I lost only one of eight planes, the second wave I lost five of eight planes.

Those comments are wrong. You can only get the reward for the Kraken achievement (or any achievement) once every 24 hours; but you can get as many Kraken achievements every 24 hours as you can.

T3 - Derzki only