loppantorkel

Do you have any plans for the Karma system? There seems to be a misconception that you only can get reported 3 times from a single player. Is that the way it's supposed to be, or should you be able to effectively drop all 7 reports on a single player?

He reached nirvana or what happened to him?

If rudder is damaged with no repair, you'd be going in circles for the rest of the game? I think your idea leads to frustration for too many players in the end.

Seems a bit sluggish today...

In what way is high tier destroyed? I think they can be pretty challenging and I assume you don't make a huge profit in tier 10 without something Premium either. Why are you grinding toward tier 10 - 'the most destroyed of all tiers'? Aren't most of the British cruisers fairly good at high tiers? Are they less fun below Minotaur? I get that some ships in some lines are plain bad, but the whole notion of grinding (and not enjoying the game) is a bit off, imo.

Today I went middle Two Brothers at start, in Des Moines, popped radar and 2dds were killed in enemy team straight away. We won comfortably. Great tactic at start.

I like variation. Sometimes a lot of bbs, sometimes dds, sometimes, but less often - cruisers. Not a big issue imo.

If I get premium time I feel more pressured to play during that time. Usually it is less fun and more work-like. Lots of complaints in forums about people feeling it's a grind for different reasons. Some may like it, others might want to give it a thought what suits them best. Edit: Permanent camos on the most expensive tier lets me play whatever I want whenever I feel like it, and it'll be a steady increase of cash. ..and no less fun.

Tier 10 camos offer a good economic boost though. I like this better than buying silver coins. edit: they could look a bit nicer though.

I think WG generally do a good job. So, why don't I buy premium ships or time? Because neither are attractive options for that price. ...Permanent camouflages otoh. Those seems more suitable for me. 5000 games in and I just became less of a freeloader

You must have annoyed him with your puny shells too.

Two battles and you give up? Pensacola is a perfectly good ship, not Belfast good but good enough. ..and it's free . @OP: Come back if you feel like it. Play for free or premium. It's still a good game either way. Fun in high tiers too. There are issues but they are ironed out, such as stealth firing. The game is better without it.

It's doable under the right circumstances, and when it is, it's usually pretty fun. Nothing wrong about playing for fun, most of us do it in the end. It's a game after all.

Well, he did say there's 'no rule they won't nerf', meaning they can nerf premiums if they feel like it. Directly, or as in your case indirectly. They are more inclined to remove OP ships from stores than nerfing them though, I think he said.

It's true that you don't understand. I haven't denied looking at stats. Those sites are good but not perfect in stat collecting, apparently, and they tell a part about the performance of ships. Experience is another part in determining OP-ness. A lot of peoples experience is better. I'm asking for opinions, not stats.

To kill a Khaba with a good captain - how much time and resources can you invest in hunting a single Khaba without losing the game in the mean time? I think a counter means that you should be able to get solve the issue in a cost-effective way, hopefully meaning you should be able to solve the issue with less resources than the actual issue is worth by itself.

just click the '15 doubloons' option to change it.

It's a good interview so far. Thanks for posting it.

I'm still on Yorck. Steven Seagal needs to get better on Des Moines too. He sounds awfully alike Donald Trump though

I wonder if this really will change that much. The lack of hydro is still a big disadvantage compared to Bismarck, imho. Still a very strong ship and one seemingly unneeded buff...

So, I'm trying to learn and upgrade the Des Moines, stumbled upon IceyJones Z-46(?) in my team and in the enemy team some [sCRUBS], of which I recognised Aotearas in Missouri. Loop map. IceyJones was lured to cap A and quickly abandoned and killed off while the rest of the team went C. The game developed into a stalemate where our team held B but they managed to get around the flanks. Could have gone differently had we managed to kill the Shima or Fletcher which both where below 500hp, but Aotearas dealt me the final blow and B was later lost. All hope was lost until we realised we had a Khaba in our team, who withered down and killed ship after ship, almost winning us the battle. In the end we didn't. Gg, wp.

Really? You tried switching teams? I guess you're stuck with the people who don't care enough to pick the winning team

Thing is that this go around. I didn't start the thread complaining about a ship asking for a nerf. I'm asking what ships others think is the most OP at high tiers. It's a discussion forum about a game. Still, people need to contribute their kneejerk responses about tears and salt. 'Whaaa whaa another thread about OP ships....'

What's up with all the spam? Is the load on WGs servers too great to handle another thread? Does all new threads have to go through a vetting process by veteran forum members? ....and 'no', apparently looking at those stats isn't enough to determine the OP-ness of a ship..

Where's the salt? Oh... you just felt an inclination to contribute with some of your own..? Well, it's okay.