loppantorkel

It's really not

So.. I guess this could be a good place to ask questions about captain skills and upgrades for Bismarck. Concealment System or Target Acquisition?

I own one too now. Have no idea how to use it properly, but it's not like anyone will notice

Two - Gearing and Fletcher. A few 16-18 I think on NO-Baltimore-DM.

Des Moines. "Our victory is inside..."

I wouldn't say they suck, but I can't replace my other upgrades for them...

I suggested something similar a good while ago - it could be a colour indicator showing an approximate how good/bad the teams were as a whole - post battle. It might be of some comfort when in losing streaks.

Doesn't use any camo? yea, that's a stretch of the p2w concept. Premium damage control also is p2w in that scenario. I don't mind the price tag on premium camo. It's ridiculous if you consider what it is you're paying for, but it's a Free to Play game and given how much time I've spent on it, I felt like a freeloader. Otoh WG offers nothing else I value - I'm not spending cash on premium ships because I don't see the point in them. Premium camo offers something I value in game - better economy in high tier. I don't care about the aesthetics. Not sure for how long these premium camos have existed in tier 10, but I think they're a good addition for some players who might be in WoWs more for the gameplay bit rather than being ship/history buffs. The price tag is okay too, imo, They're quite useful without being p2w, and tier 10 games are optional anyway. You can get by by playing middle tier to support high tier games, or you could just play really good and still earn a profit in tier 10.

I too met darkstar73 a few minutes ago in enemy team, he in Shima, me in Des Moines. He managed to land two torps on me, though in the end we won quite easily. Good game, nice seeing you

Working as intended? All things fine? I don't see the issue.

I agree. I also like sending some bad vibes to other people that deserve it

..but that you're too lazy do the math or dig around for - Can you citadel bbs with Cruiser AP shells, broadside, close range? or always go for superstructure? Thank you

There seems to be 10% difference in WR between solo and 3 man div in his case. I didn't think of this as an issue before, only when superunicums division up to crush the opposition. This might be worse though.

I can see a lot of enemy bb players using 'interfere in my game' report.

Or maybe play in divisions? Oh, my god, don't division up!!

10 cits on a bb? I've been doing it wrong edit: question answered. Thank you. I haven't been lucky the few times I've tried. Anyone else is free to take over, if they got another one.

Yea, ordinary submarines and depth charges would be interesting. ..but I think that lies further ahead, if ever. Maybe it's just too difficult to make it work. Cvs are a mess to balance as it is.

..or rocket mounted subs - it would solve the potential boredom of submarine gameplay and counter the abundance of bbs. Not sure how it would affect the meta, but...

Quite easily, I'd say. I'm not nerding down in every aspect of the game.

I've noticed Des Moines AP being a solid choice when dealing with Khaba. Might just have been getting some lucky shots. I hope this isn't a buff to Khaba.. it's not needed. Gearing might need a bit better protection though, but HE usually does the work there...

Like you need to hit a cruiser broadside to do ridiculously amount of damage.

Here's an easy one - when having weekly missions that include farming damage from nation or class specific ships - could you double the daily bonus of those ships so more play them in Random? This week - 100% daily bonus for Russian ships.

They are working on it though

Found it

Or you could provide a good community service and play Budyonny a bit