MrWastee

they do kinda, though on the lower tiers with a better dispersion it would be over the top imo. even with those -15% one already can do inflict quite some, f.e. on that rushing dd close-up in a full t6 match. indeed i don't see it as much as a problem as the range in general.

.... o my.... why their wording does inflict a cold feeling running down my back?! could be anything or nothing for the german t7 bb's in regard to that gap...

thx .... then i can't be aware of it, as i do not watch streams ...... not putting my hopes up too high though. i guess that more points on a general adjustment, rather than a rework of single ships ^^.... but well, gotta wait 'n see again i guess. in doubt, anyways, they just could do it right away without even the danger to break something. as, with the rework, they could adjust it in line again lol

care to elaborate? on stream or blog? not aware of such alike atm. just of the mechanical change with manual secs ^^. thx

....N E V E R ! ! ! .... true something's coming up on that end. though, i'm talking the ship side. really hope they might use the opportunity to bring it in line, but can't imagine really ..... i mean, to me that gap is so obvious since pef got added. like around 300m addition from t6 to t7, 3km from t7 to t8 and then again in the 100m's range .... it's fine with me to have such a gap from t8 to t10 as they kinda share the same mm, the gap on t7 just not fits the tier at all imo. like around 9-10km maxed out sounds way more appropiate in my ears. ofc there's the t5 mm thingie, but afaik since mm readjustments for t8's/10's such matches are like hitting the jackpot.

"reasons for resetting branches"...... .................. N O N E ! ! ! now take the whole thing PLZZZZZZZZZZZZ and shove it to..... the dark side. 2cts

can it be ignited?!

...given a proper implementation (lol)..... WROOONG

..., dass hier keiner im zweifel die entsprechende perspektive oder entscheidungsgrundlage kennt.... in cb's werden ohne ende credits, free xp und stahl obendrauf gefarmt... ich kann mir durchaus vorstellen, unabhängig der vergleichsweise lächerlichen höhe von rewards aus den täglichen, dass hier wg-seitig animositäten bestehen diese über den cb modus verfügbar zu machen. ... denn sonst hätten sie's ggf. eben schon gemacht?... 2 pfennige :)

let's be honest here: u already got ur cv related feedback since 2 seasons now?!... what did change in that regard?.... cyclones, now REALLY?!?!?!..................... no offence, u're cool, but though tied to what u do for a living. totally can accept that. what somehow is hard to accept is this companies attitude in that regard!.... i mean like really: CYCLONES, after 2 seasons of related feedback?!................................ it's nothing but not even #worthalol.... here's some feddback to take up: STATISTICS IS NOT ONLY ABOUT QUANTITIVES, IT'S AS WELL ABOUT QUALITIVES! so they might plz consider this while milking spreadsheet next time. thx. 2cts. edit: really.... they could've simply taken a non cv tier this time to work something out in the mean. but why really, if one got several k's of free lab rats at hand, eh? edith's edit: competetive simply sucks if certain mechanics it does rely on are taken out of the forumla by a single class. it's totally unpredictable indeed for one team on how it will influence it's play, until shortly before it happens. without real counterplay in regard to the sole effect of spotting taken out (lolsmoke cd's). spotting follows certain, and for the mode kinda fundamental, rules. these can be taken out, so actually the base of it all becomes kinda worth nothing. what da hell is so hard to understand about that?! and then cyclones.... to soften down the effect on spotting, not in all matches anyway..... yay teamplay and x-fire.... on t10 maps......... within cyclones. sounds like war of blobs is wanted? i would laugh allover if it not made me cry.

....just had the hilarious guess of all in one clan, shortened [TRUMP]

yep, back

....oh wee, takemetakeme... got fdr .... yeah....wellllll........ *sigh*

me gusto, they just won't

it's about veggies baby, not about dem package ^^ ;D

nah, they're taking notes all along anyway... i mean, they care for our feedback right?!... and, ofc, to mark certain accounts for speshul gulag treatment in terms of mm and rng, right?!

i like. just won't happen within the next century in wows i guess, if not kind of real pressure is established. and for that i think nothing but a rage on santa-gate niveau would cut it (won't come, to less into cb's i guess), or as proposed, a communtiy driven approach that basicially puts the middlefinger right into their noses so to say lol. just from the discussion in here (or since cv rework), nothing gonna change. they'll just flip it off with their spreadsheets.

"we valued ur feedback, now open up (ur minds lol ^^) and let it (our wisdom) in" .... really... gimping surface ships even more by cyclones, and ofc cv on top.... gj... NOT!

well, then 1st off: it's possible and a matter of will dev-side obviously. and 2ndly: we're talking cb's here, right?

u're not, that simple. one, in such a case, would've go through ranked hell for such. also wouldn't matter really in both systems. in ur proposed "wg system" such ships would've to be in the selection. stalin is worth nothing if it can't be played, right? and in a community driven system it's a matter of constitution of such, if there's a mechanic in the setting up process to ex- or include such ships... if a ruleset that is accepted don't include such ships there's no need at all to long for them?

.... guess that's the point where we're back at community driven league i guess

well, there is a slight difference between "any ship of t'x" to "only these certain ships on t'x", right? with only a few selected ships there's quite some danger queues just don't fill up in such system. no matter if player feel forced to get certain ships or not (and might even do so)... this i see even cumulated in system that shifts tier per f.e. per week. thus, without appropiate rental policy most likely will dry out/not being played coz only a few clans actually can play. even more if tiers shift. but that's imo. no one here has measures to actually estimate such effects proper i guess.

wayne

donde esta la biblioteca? wo ist meine bibel? jetno piwo prozce? alea iacta est! mille grazie, au revoir

indeed a nice idea. but only would work with a appropiate mix of rentals given out. otherwise many clans might only could participate once in a while due to lack of certain ships... i mean, in combination with a set number of slots per class it could lead to in the end one ship missing, even though several players with other t10's (or whatever) around.