MrWastee

i'm not so sure if it's about possible refunds in free xp, as we just had several months of maaad free xp farming. also not too many players got a whortwhile ammount of cv's for trade in to begin with? could play a role, i more expect it to be due to someones brainfart

.... i summon zee @MrConway

ok, why not bite : an elaborated opinion, founded on "high quality" experience and knowledge about game mechanics and synergies. proven by stats and referring on planned changes to said mechanics, which he evidently seem to understand very well... edit: nvm, back to discussion the topic, rather than the op...

u're funny.... as if he, as a player, would need to have those.... doesn't lower the value of his feedback, based on his experience and skill-level regarding wows gameplay in comparison to other players/referring his given perspective on the discussed matter.... friend, come down from the clouds. ... or not, idc

all in all, reading over all of it (planned changes and introductions), it's like someone didn't watch the calender... april fools event should be something fun, not something like..... 0.8.x.$/€.f.o (whatever that is ^^)... ah, found what it could be :): (planning phase)

...only hate u might earn is most probably for posting ur very own thread on ur perception, while there's tons of similar opinions in several feedback threads around.... at least me myself, i see no reason at all for packing this into a new thread.... but i'm fine with it, if it's been for entertaining purposes

1. penalties for afk'ing or tk'ing 2. missions that demands wins 2.1 legendary module grind on t10 (4th? mission stage) ...... aaaand 3.: leisure time, for whatever reason. to me coop is rather dull.

really can't help u then, as we not seem to speak the same language. in my language the bismarck still is one of the few of the awesomeness ;D.... hope u'll find a substitute, but plz in that case rather a lowtier that teaches to use mb's (?! <half arsed joke ^^). coz in randoms i fear u might burden ur team if u go into t8+ matches, just to let ur secondaries play 4 u...

eeerm... why u are so focussed on sce hits?! if its about that rather play coop, really.... the secs are a tool, one of some the biZ got. turtleback, hydro and guns that force u to rather go close are others. if one yoloes each match just to knock some sec-hits off, well. play the match on the ship u are on, not the match u'd liked to have on a ship that doesnt really exist. in other words: on hightier matches as a sec-ship rather NOT go in on start, coz that 4 sure gonna get u focussed. taking a turn and flanking in from about midmatch (or outta cover), goin for vulnerable, light armored targets. still bismark is a superb dd hunter... at least as long they dont run ! it always depends on the match, it doesnt care about ur preferences for sechits or dmg. edit: i do play and love it coz it perfectly fits my style. it's a tank and a puncher, it wants to get shot on. and it wants to prevail, while providing the tools to do so, no matter the battletier..... i m o

last 2 matches (sec build with fp, no concealment), oh how useless .... ^adores being lowtier. in short: nothing wrong or deceicively(?) altered in my experience. Bismarck VIII 2 50% Average 3 726 Super Unicum 117 102 2.5 0.5

translation: any comment on 0.8.0 is wasted coz gettin ignored in development process anyway... clap clap clap

#wrongthread

...whatever..... APAIN....gggggggggggzzzzzzzzzzzz................ xx * xx time.......

the problem with sec builds beneath t7 is range and dispersion imo. i play the gneis rather like a mid- to longrange bb, while the scharn (relaod, no. of barrels, calibre) i run with my sec bismarck captn for the meme (hybrid sec captn with fp, aft, man secs, no bft but ar). from my experience these secs have way less to do than from t8 on and are really more like gimmickly. gneis guns shortrange on t7 more run in danger to overpen and miss though being closerange, so i totally refrained from a sec build on her. i might edit my builds in later on, can't atm. (edit) here's jsut a quick view on my personal permformance under these premisses in the last 3 weeks: Scharnhorst VII 11 63.64% Unicum 1 691 Very Good 60 223 1.27 3 Gneisenau VII 2 100% Super Unicum 3 324 Super Unicum 81 802 3 0

simple: coz they can! gotta instantly think off a line in a german song: und du fragst mich "warum machen die das denn?", die antwort is ganz einfach.... .: "weil sie's können" --> and u ask me, "why do they do this/that", the answer is quite easy.... .:"coz they can"

u know, i like ur attitude on communications, really do ! nevertheless a short search in here would've revealed the mountains of topics and posts on the matter, so may check in detail next time an idea hits u. someone else might already had it before and, in that case, most likely the matter is known and discussed through already as well. no one likes dead horses, they tend to stink.... to conclude, i think the number tyrendian gave is approximately right, +/- a few thousands lol...

2 ways to play her imo... recent change to secs made sec build absolute viable with ifhe, don't bother with secs if u dont wanna go ifhe (at least before the changes it was absolut pointless and a lot of useless glitter)!... no concealment captnskill here 1. full survival spec, long- (lol) to midrange, rather 2nd line (good resuslts here with that) 2. full sec build with ifhe. mid- to shortrange, rather situational. 4 sure this variant demands more from the player in terms of match awareness and positioning... and is a hell lotta fun on good matches, while not so good ones might get a lot shorter than on the survival variant.

here, have it easy next time :

hab nur ma kurz reingeschaut um zu sehen obs was wirklich neues gibt, nur um über diesen mega-lacher zu stolpern ....thx, made my day (mmn is beim rts ne absolut unzureichende menge rumgedoktort worden, v.a. an den falschen enden, aber von sowas wie "geplanter" entwicklung würd ich da im ansatz nich sprechen lol!)

against for this