-
Content Сount
4,255 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
33584 -
Clan
[THESO]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by MrWastee
-
make private plz
-
sounds like close range aerial drop ^^.... there not been planes around by any chance?.... 4 the record: -screenshots -replay byebye
-
huh? it's meant as "this or that".^^
-
... u know u want it! it even may be the easiest way to counter omnipresent cv's? 1 strike and 1 counter cv per match? fight!....
-
Schutzengel-Jäger gegen CV=Spielverderber
MrWastee replied to Chassadhi's topic in Allgemeine Diskussionen
nur kurz zum eröffnungspost: nein! versuchs nochmal, aber bitte ohne undefinierbare mechaniken mit ner tonne an unpraktikablen implikationen, wie z.B.: - mehrfach kurzfristig wechslende spitzen auf verschiedenen seiten (von wegen matchdynamik) - insta abgeschossene schutzengel weil zu nah/nutzlos weil schutzobjekt tot - .... mmn nach is die einzig adäquate konsequenz zu dem mist den wir jetz haben die einführung von jägerlayouts zwecks fröhlichen dogfights (die mit den fliegern, nix hunde)! zumindest müssten cv's dann wirklich aufpassen wohin sie fliegen und hätten einen gleich-dynamischen counterpart. -
-
tx usn heavy ca tease (note like by mr conwaytm). thx @WolfGewehr:
-
... on a less serious note: why not? that's only like 3 salvos with musashi .... fun fact: after reading ur comment and writing mine i felt like taking musashi out for a ranked, even though i had horrible matches on the few tries yet.... ended up accidentally launching anno1404 #brainsaveZ
-
Why not give CVs a limited range of operations?
MrWastee replied to Rattles33's topic in General Discussion
dont expect it to come. can see the myriads of threads already, complaining about their planes falling down "right after takeoff" -
Why not give CVs a limited range of operations?
MrWastee replied to Rattles33's topic in General Discussion
erm, yeah.... one major aspect that would've made rts playable and balanceable.... ur late to the party clapclapclap -
woat ....da.....chickenor.................
-
To the person who approved the CV changes...
MrWastee replied to idkwidlol123's topic in General Discussion
take as much as u like, there's ngh 4 all -
afaik it should be possible to only refund perma camo, shouldn't it?! not 4 me
-
in here? nope, next.....
-
right! even though this is where me personally asks u to ask for feedback on any (fundamentally) changes(/bugfixes) on the games core systems, where as many players as possible can get aware of what's goin on. it doesnt matter if it's a bug or not. if it's on live it will get perceived as feature in the 1st place, unless somehow behaving weird (which not was the case in this case). anything in regard to changes that generally effect things like f.e. penetration, spotting, concealment, etc. edit: on the other hand there IS quite some stuff in the pipe to distract besides cv's (flooding, radar, woatnuts...), so it is understandable from that pov ("just a bug") it got overseen. BUT still, any change of games core system, even if "only" a bugfix, deserves some "more than usual" attention imo.
-
fmi: anyone of those few did post a thread about in here, gameplay, or somewhere else than than pts section? if not and given the image one would've had done so, somehow i got the feeling, we might not would've had this situation now ^^.
-
and it's not only 'bout ingame event madness.... i tend to never pts, simply as i not do benefit from it on live (pun intended?! )... many players also simply are so short on time, that the option to pts is like none really. tbh, i do expect them to filter all the feedback on pts, even more when it's low in numbers. and if none would pts i'd expect them to hire people to pts lol... coz it's their job to pts, so they do secure their very own job in the long run.
-
i agree that might be a problem in terms of possible degree of impact. nevertheless there's quantity feedback and quality feedback. some things are simply a matter of substance, not of numbers. can be more easily overseen or underestimated if not strong in numbers, but still there's the aspect of substance. many players may simply do not like to pts or give feedback there, for whatever reasons (o' so many).... it's the job of certain people to filter between quality and quantity, just as well to professionally not get distracted by big pr bubbles set by the comapny itself. ... one thing is for sure, i would not like to do such job and mostly i got the impression the people who do it in here are doing well in it! in this case though, understandable, someone might not was aware. always yet changes on spotting and concealment had great impact and were controversial among the playerbase. next time these people might not miss anything when it comes down to concealment and spotting . 2 worthless cts p.s.: feedback, in numbers, most probably is only and best to be found in here, the gameplay section. in doubt might just ask here in forward, so it not gets screwed up in the afterrun.
-
u know that, i know that, they do know so 4 sure.... and yet they come around with that foul excuse, just a few before everyone expects it to come (other freemiums taken out) and right before they introduce nther ship anyway.... my mom would've slapped me (righteousely) hard for such!
-
a big lulz 4 the record if this 'bout ranked in any way! it's gonna be packed with krons, mushis and blacks anyway, adding alaska really wouldnt matter in that regard lol....
-
i think as well the numbers pretty much speak for themselves in this case and are more than reason ngh on their own....
-
in other words: u can get a new t8prem with 0.8.0 for only (roughly) 27k dubs, while we keep t9prem alaska back coz we dont wanna mix "major" additions to the game at the same time, like f.e. a new ship and cv rework......... .................................................................... ............................................................................................... gg wg, gg! coz adding freemium alaska is more complicated than whole new year thingie with 27k dubs t8 prem
-
... so who would've expected the 1st sheetstorm with 0.8.0 not gonna be 'bout cv's (or alaska in that regard lel).... i'm sure i owe someone now
-
suggestion might be in already, so plz don't hit me.... THE forum, as a cross-server forum in (officially net-mothertongue?! )... english only (german speaking here). this way we could exchange opinions with other communities much easier when it comes down to terms of opinions about balance, additions and such (general gameplay discussion)... or is that what reddit is actually? 2cts
-
so... alaska gets hold back, coz new ship and rework together is too hard to handle... how 'bout a change to an intuitive and good working mechanic then? a'ight, no danger on that to break anything .... it's becoming comedy gold again, not coz of the rework yet (like one would xpect, so do i for it to come lol), but coz of all the hurried up things around it. aa auras, alaska, spotting.... no words about all the upcoming planned changes.... but a ship is too much rofl.... wg, really plz..... bet is on jinx ... like in total jinxed!
